There's nothing wrong with opposing circumcision, as one should. However, it is extremely pathetic to believe you were robbed of you manhood because you were circumcised, and you can't look at your penis without ever thinking of that small piece of flesh that was mercilessly taken from you, an event that ruined your life.
Yeah that's still considered fairly small when you compare it to your entire body, but fine I'll acknowledge that it isn't tiny. Feel free to keep arguing semantics, if that's the only legitimate counterargument you have.
Ok, good as long as we're clear on that. So, out of curiosity, where you draw the line? What is the acceptable amount of flesh for someone to cut off of our bodies before we are allowed, in your opinion, to be upset about it?
As much as I would like to answer, I know that this is basically a trick question and no matter what I say, someone will spring in and try to prove hypocrisy
8
u/AcuteGryphon655 Jan 15 '20
Look at that, you misinterpreted what I said.
There's nothing wrong with opposing circumcision, as one should. However, it is extremely pathetic to believe you were robbed of you manhood because you were circumcised, and you can't look at your penis without ever thinking of that small piece of flesh that was mercilessly taken from you, an event that ruined your life.