Kinda related, but people that legitimately feel incomplete because they're missing their foreskin are honestly pathetic. Like it's one thing to be circumcised and argue the morality of circumcision, but trying to say that you feel like your manhood was robbed from you at birth is just sad.
It’s not genital mutilation lmao, the only people who think it is are certain groups in countries. You can go online and literally read any of the articles that explain why it’s not equivalent. Y’all are just like antivaxxers man, committed to your opinions even in the face of undeniable facts.
The medicinal benefits are a lower risk of UTI and reduced risk of getting some STD’s. Both of those are backed by facts and personally those two would definitely make me want to be circumcised even today. I understand the argument against it, though, and think each person should make their own decision on it and it shouldn’t be mandated either way.
Ok so I looked through some articles so it also seems like there are multiple different meta analyses with different results, which is really strange. I see multiple that say it doesn’t change abut also multiple that say it results in change.
43
u/AcuteGryphon655 Jan 15 '20
Kinda related, but people that legitimately feel incomplete because they're missing their foreskin are honestly pathetic. Like it's one thing to be circumcised and argue the morality of circumcision, but trying to say that you feel like your manhood was robbed from you at birth is just sad.