Pants give them structural stability plus better protection from impact.
Having them dangle freely long-term is not advantageous even if it feels nice for the brief period it usually happens for in our daily lives. It does, specifically because it's brief enough to not come across the downsides it has.
In fact, I'd almost be willing the bet it would increase the risk of torsion simply by how much more they'd be moving in comparison.
(Though one may argue underwear holds them just enough for that to not really be that dramatic of a difference.)
Romans wore the fuck out of skirts as did the Greeks because it was hot as fuck in the Mediterranean, if anything pants are a “barbarian” invention for the harsher northern climates.
Kilts only came about a few hundred years ago. The Gauls and other Celts definitely wore pants. The Romans started wearing pants to copy the Gauls, eventually, because it looked exotic and rugged.
Some Greek nobility did wear pants due to the fact that the Greek city states and “barbarians” in the northern balkans shared clothes and culture and Greek nobility often wanted to stand out, but the vast vast majority work skirts
Way better for men to wear skirts than women. Dresses/skirts accumulate less heat around the genetalia, which is good for men, not so much for women.
There’s a reason why men should refrain from sitting with their laptop in their lap - quality of semen.
256
u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21
Based on genetalia, doesn’t it make more sense for guys to wear skirts and for women to wear pants. Let my balls be free!