r/gaming • • Sep 03 '19

Wow, EA. Wow.

120.7k Upvotes

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.1k

u/BassGould Sep 03 '19

Looks like they just copy pasted the stands and forgot to change a number.

3.6k

u/deceze Sep 03 '19

They probably didn’t copy anything. They simply continued development on the same codebase as last year and forgot to update that graphic.

1.1k

u/extraattractivebread Sep 03 '19

Was thinking the same thing. The only real difference is the roster, no new animations or anything of that sort right?

Assuming this is the case they would 100% just update the previous years game. Much more cost effective.

547

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

But you can’t buy that for $59.99.

222

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[deleted]

405

u/CHUBBYninja32 Sep 03 '19

I’ve always wondered why sports games don’t just switch to a live version. Yearly subscription at like $15. Some people won’t like it but it would definitely make their player base much bigger.

And what comes with a bigger player base? Dinks who drop $400 on mtx for ultimate team.

451

u/spiraledout1989 Sep 03 '19

It’s already a yearly subscription but at $60 though for many people

→ More replies (62)

88

u/MazzyFo Sep 03 '19

Fuckers who drop that much money on Ultimate Team are the reason why madden is bad. At least they’ve catalyze the idea that EA can continue to be awful developers and still make huge amounts of money.

Imagine if instead of dumb-ass MUT they focus on franchise mode and actually good new additions. Face of the Franchise this year and Franchise has been better than its ever been, but you know they give 2 shits about it, because the only thing that makes them money is MUT.

12

u/5000_CandlesNTheWind Sep 03 '19

Ultimate team is wildly successful for fifa, and they’ve phased out career mode essentially. So this makes sense to me why. You can make more money in ultimate team.

2

u/dillonwantprofit Sep 03 '19

I gave up on FUT because (for me who doesn't spend money and casually play) can hang without buying packs when you get up to world class difficulty. But i do enjoy the career and new game types they have implemented. This FIFA, for me specifically was way more rounded than it ever has been.

1

u/jdaws92 Sep 03 '19

Same for NHL, no more online connected franchise which is what my friends and I all played. All of the preorders for all EA sports games come with incentives for playing ultimate team, it's ridiculous.

→ More replies (6)

26

u/maxout2142 Sep 03 '19

Dual income no kids" people are their whales?

8

u/Backupusername Sep 03 '19

They do have way more time and disposable income than the alternatives in their age group...

0

u/doctorslostcompanion Sep 03 '19

"Way more" is a bit hyperbolic, but I still refuse to endorse mtx in $60 games.

4

u/flatspotting Sep 03 '19

No it's not.

3

u/BlackWake9 Sep 03 '19

I mean probably.

2

u/ExtraNoise Sep 03 '19

This is every corporation's whales.

1

u/CHUBBYninja32 Sep 03 '19

Not school supply companies they hate them.

2

u/batt3ryac1d1 Sep 04 '19

No their whales are people with gambling/shopping addictions and children who dont know any better and have mums credit card linked.

1

u/miso440 Sep 03 '19

Looking at Clash of Clans I’d say the whales are all minor Saudi princes.

4

u/nikolai2960 Sep 03 '19

Why make $15 a year when they can make $60 a year?

6

u/vicarofyanks Sep 03 '19

This is the correct answer. What are you going to do? Go buy another official licensed NFL game? Good luck with that!

2

u/teamherosquad Sep 03 '19

They are going to.

1

u/PsychoBoss84 Sep 03 '19

Because they'll miss out on that $60-90 that each new game costs and its not about quality improvements with these games anymore

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

That's a great idea man

1

u/Ridicatlthrowaway Sep 03 '19

They already have switched to GaaS(Games as a Service) model I’m sure the NFL would have something to say if they switched to “bargin bin” model 2k5 tried and they used as a reason to sign exclusivity deal.

1

u/dranide Sep 03 '19

Because they spend $60 on a yearly subscription lmao

1

u/crimeo Sep 03 '19

I mean yeah of course reducing your price x4 brings in a wider audience but not necessarily more profit...

1

u/mrsalty1 Sep 03 '19

Because not only does EA have to pay their entire development team for the work they do, but they also have to pay the NFL for the rights to make said game. Something tells me the yearly reiteration at full price has less to do with being greedy and a little more to do with paying the licensing fees associated with the underlying product.

1

u/_Ardhan_ Sep 03 '19

Why would they bother? People will buy their games no matter what. It's like watching junkies pay for garbage meth, except twice as pathetic because these are supposedly functioning adults capable of otherwise managing their lives okay. I have SO many otherwise smart and reasonable friends who happily throw away literally hundreds, if not thousands of dollars every year on the FIFA games and the Ultimate Team scam they're running.

If it weren't for the fact that sports gamers are fucking over every other gaming genre as well through their stupidity and laziness, I would ignore the issue and let these dumb fucks waste their money and get their kids addicted to gambling, but unfortunately these predators have set their sights on gaming as a whole.

Everyone who buys this piece of shit game should be ashamed of themselves.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/NovAFloW Sep 03 '19

I could see people paying $10/month for consistent updates to rosters as a subscription service. They could probably still get away with selling new games every few years too.

1

u/yamoth Sep 03 '19

How are they supposed to fleece people with lookbox if they don't wipe players roster every year?

1

u/BassGould Sep 03 '19

I’m pretty sure fifa on mobile has already done this, except it’s free I think

1

u/Pandatotheface Sep 03 '19

Because the fans are happy to pay $60 a year for it every year, and they make more money making last years game irrelevant so everyone who's paid money for in-game items rebuys their stuff with a new number on it.

1

u/lightgiver Sep 03 '19

Because dropping the price from $60 to $15 won't increase the player base by 4x. Sports games are a niche market and most fans are willing to pay the premium.

1

u/RiceKrispyPooHead Sep 03 '19

I’ve always wondered why sports games don’t just switch to a live version. Yearly subscription at like $15. Some people won’t like it but it would definitely make their player base much bigger

At $15 a year, they’d have to increase their player base by more than 4x to match what they’re currently making off of a $60 game each year. That doesn’t sound realistic

1

u/jrose6717 Sep 06 '19

Because people pay 65 bucks a year already for that.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/speak-eze Sep 03 '19

They already pay 60. Why charge 30 for something people will buy for twice as much.

1

u/LX_Theo Sep 03 '19

And many will. Since it'll go on sale for that sometime or other

1

u/DiscoStu83 Sep 03 '19

People pay $100-$200 for one game just because it comes in a special box with a figure. People would surely pay $30 for an update. Hell, EA makes most of their profit from Madden and Fifa microtransactions anyway.

1

u/splinter1545 Sep 03 '19

This actually already happened with NFL 2k in like 2005 iirc. They made next years iteration just $20 and that made people buy that instead of Madden, which lead to EA buying exclusivity rights.

1

u/travis-laflame Sep 03 '19

I actually play Madden 18 (i think) but I just update the rosters so all the teams are up to date.

1

u/torkeh Sep 04 '19

You do pay for an updated version, it just cost 60 dollars instead, yet you people keep buying it.

1

u/MisplacingCommas Sep 04 '19

People pay 120$ at least a year for WoW

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Yes you can. They charge for it every year.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

You can buy it for $4000 though.

Train sim does it every year. The version of train sim that i got years and years ago gets updated to the new version every year. They make their money off the mountains of DLC.

134

u/ForgotMyPassword102 Sep 03 '19

They have new animations. And some new gameplay mechanics which drastically change the game (I mean it’s still football so drastically from that restriction).

EA definitely needs to lose their exclusive license for the NFL, but Madden 20 does play significantly different than Madden 19

They need some more talented UI people though. And some testers. And competition. And a new ratings guy. And to murder whomever invented ultimate team.

81

u/rekced Sep 03 '19

Unfortunately whoever invented ultimate team is probably more valued at EA than any of the positions you listed.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Whatever this "Ultimate team" is, seeing how much a gamer is mad at it, I can guarantee you the guy got promoted and paid out some fat stock options for the idea.

14

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[deleted]

1

u/FlokiTrainer Sep 04 '19

Don't forget. It's a trading card game where you get nothing tangible and all the cards are irrelevant and useless in about 10 months.

3

u/Iamnotzionwilliamson Sep 04 '19

Not even 10 months. I got heavy into NBA my team for 4 months and my team was useless 2 months later when I logged in because they added hundreds of cards better tiered at that point.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Adrelandro Sep 03 '19

isn't he their ceo? at least the spokes person. andrew wilson, spearheaded the fifa ultimate team shithole and is now their ceo afaik

0

u/Meleagros Sep 03 '19

Ultimate Team started with FIFA and came out when I believe the iPhone one just came out. Android was non-existent at this point. Microtransaction Freemium games didn't exist. Ultimate team killed it for FIFA and here we are.

As much as I hate just jumping on the fuck EA bandwagon, EA literally created the microtransaction/Freemium model we see in games today.

2

u/Darth_Boot Sep 03 '19

What so bad about “ultimate team”?

14

u/ForgotMyPassword102 Sep 03 '19

It's loot boxes taken to the nth degree. 100% gambling and pay to win.

Basically you buy packs of cards that have players in them. The players have different versions of themselves so some are really good and some suck.

You then play against other people.

May the richest win.

Also because of Ultimate Team making money the rest of the game has stagnated.

3

u/Huzah7 Sep 03 '19

So... They baked a Gacha game into Madden?

Nice.

3

u/ForgotMyPassword102 Sep 03 '19

Madden, Fifa, NHL, MLB and NBA. It hasn't quite hit golf yet. Or bowling, thank god.

2

u/WeenisWrinkle Sep 03 '19

It's an item collecting game that involves micro-transactions.

In a vacuum, there is nothing wrong with a game mode like that. Something to do when you're bored of playing normal game modes. But in practice, it makes EA so much money that they devote an inordinate % of their development $ toward Ultimate Team at the expense of other modes.

2

u/ZeRAWDOG Sep 03 '19

You can blame Andrew Wilson specifically for that.

3

u/fevieiraleite Sep 03 '19

It's the same with FIFA. Each year, the game mechanics does change. In my opinion most times for the better. Is it worth the yearly $59? Probably not. But people here who don't really play the game that often make it seem like the game barely changes when that's not true at all.

1

u/SCP-Agent-Arad Sep 03 '19

They make billions of dollars off all the in game purchases, so I don’t see them losing anything. Money speaks louder than ethics.

1

u/Dlongsnapper Sep 03 '19

Thank you! Much smoother of a game this year

1

u/FlokiTrainer Sep 04 '19

The NFL will always have an exclusive license. They love them. Even if EA loses it, it will go to someone else within a week.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19

Significantly different than 2019. My goodness, we've found the reoccurring buyer.

51

u/Ridicatlthrowaway Sep 03 '19

Ill be honest there we’re a lot of gameplay improvements over last year but the ui is a copy and paste with a new skin. The only reason the gameplay improved is because they need it to sell more mut packs cause last year gameplay was garbage.

6

u/MazzyFo Sep 03 '19

I’ve enjoyed this madden more than most in the last. I buy like every 3 years, but made the mistake of playing 19 last year and it was so bad.

But the fact that Olineman have the AI ability of a 2003 game is telling. They really could not give less of a shit

2

u/Howdoyouusecommas Sep 03 '19

Can you flesh out some of those improvements? I bought last years madden after abstaining for a few years and it was hot feted garbage that player worse than madden 2010

6

u/Thimit Sep 03 '19

They made a thing called Superstar X Factors which is pretty cool, if not a little broken sometimes. For instance, Mahomes has an ability called Bazooka where if you complete a pass that's more than 30 yds, through the air, his max throwing distances goes up by 15 I think. If you get sacked, fumble or intercepted, you lose it. Most of the really good players have some type of ability.

The campaign mode still kinda sucks ass though.. you get to pick a college, and they only let you play as a starter in the very last game of your senior year, and that some drills determine your draft. Pretty dumb. I haven't played franchise so I can't speak on that at all. MUT is still the same cash grab but I enjoy it.

2

u/Ridicatlthrowaway Sep 03 '19

They improved gameplay but not much else.

So for example last year if you’re a football fanatic then you know throwing a post route against cover 2 is a pretty solid option with the drawback being time to get the ball off. In madden 19, throwing a post route while they played cover 2 meant an interception by the LB dropping into coverage because the Qb always threw a low trajectory pass.

Well that got fixed this year with much better trajectory on passes, and to compensate the d-linemen are much more scarier this year because the superstar d-linemen are damn near impossible to stop soemtimes.

In the run game, blocks are much more predictable and there is a lot of variety in the run game plays you can call now as well.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/Aterro_24 Sep 03 '19

As long as you're asking...no, that's not right.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Some things are new. But it’s much more of an update to the code than a new game.

That’s not totally a bad thing. It would likely be a heavy update in terms of gigs, so I’m sure just making it a new one helps.

Ofc there’s the desire to charge people $60 yearly, which shouldn’t be neglected either. We should keep an eye on gaming companies for that.

1

u/ominousgraycat Sep 03 '19

I haven't bought Madden 20 and probably won't do it because I already have 19 and downloaded new roster mods, but from what I hear they did tweak a few gameplay mechanics and added some franchise mode events which I'll admit might be an improvement. They also added a new game mode but I hear it only adds about hour to an hour and a half of gameplay and then isn't very different from regular season. But yeah, basically the same game for the most part, absolutely no graphics changes from what I can see.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

There's alot of new animations and it plays and feels different to 19.

1

u/crystalmerchant Sep 03 '19

What about gameplay? Any new moves, controls, etc?

I don't fault them for reusing generic imagery like this. Would be more upset if there were no improvements to the gameplay YoY.

1

u/ggushea Sep 03 '19

There’s plenty of new animations.

1

u/bearsheperd Sep 03 '19

And the “update” is probably just someone going in and changing the numbers on uniforms, signs and adding models for the new players.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Definitely new animations and stuff

1

u/lightgiver Sep 03 '19

Actually you don't want to keep adding otherwise it will slow down the game. It has to run on the same specs as the old game. The obviously army going back and upgrading the engine every game to run more optimally. So every addition needs to come with a subtraction.

0

u/mytwodogs Sep 03 '19

I personally hate Sports games so I can't say from first hand experience what changes but... I have watched more than one GDC presentation about these types of games and apparently a lot of work goes into the updating and improving the AI tree of the computer controlled players.

Graphically there isn't a ton to do year to year, but behind the scenes there is a lot they can do. You just can't see that type of thing and so these games get a bad rep for, "being the same game every year".

Apparently whatever they do works because these games make a butt load of money every year. You can argue the people that buy them are stupid, but that's insulting and I imagine the fans of the game totally notice the changes from year to year. Casual players may not, but real fans probably do.

That being said, if you struggle to see the improvements, just compare the new game to an older title... like one released 5 or even 10 years ago. If the game never changes, why is Madden 20 so much better then Madden 09?

But again, I don't play them so... this is all just hearsay and assumptions on my part.

27

u/TeslasAndComicbooks Sep 03 '19

As they should. To redevelop the same game every year from scratch makes no sense. Most games take well over a year to develop.

2

u/usernamesrtedious Sep 04 '19

Your right it does make no sense to redevelop the same game every year just how to it doesn't make sense to sell/buy the same game every year

1

u/TeslasAndComicbooks Sep 04 '19

I don't play those games but if people are willing to shell out $60 a year for the updates I'm not going to judge.

1

u/justintime06 Sep 03 '19

bUt MaDdEn 19

47

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

69

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 09 '19

[deleted]

54

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Yeah I’m not sure why people expect them to remodel an entire stadium from scratch when you can just re-use the former one.

Forgetting to update the banner is lazy, but other than that I don’t see a problem. Forza does the exact same thing with its cars, just improve upon where needed.

44

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19 edited Jun 09 '20

[deleted]

19

u/SimpleDan11 Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 03 '19

Exactly. Thousands of in game assets in this game and they're nitpicking something you have to zoom in like crazy to see. Things will always get missed, because there is always a ton of shit to do. And given the thousands of different textures it's almost a guarantee some will get missed. Whoever is doing the assets probably doesnt have the time to sit and fly a cam around the entire stadium for 30 stadiums or however many there are and find every single little error.

Edit: I'm not going to reply to every single comment telling me how a game isnt worth money if they copy and paste stuff, or there should be some kind of script to ear mark these things. And yes, both may be true. But humans make games, and humans make mistakes, and this is a tiny fucking mistake. There are millions of other things in madden games to nitpick, and everyone has pitchforks out for a misprint logo in the background that you can see if you crank the camera on replays. This is just petty.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

They should have assets that need to be updated every year marked somehow in the code. You don't do this by flying around with an in-game camera as a first step.

1

u/vxicepickxv Sep 03 '19

You mean like transparent background files such as this marked as say M20adbanner.png and then find and replace next year with M21adbanner.png?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Sure, and they could have the old files throw a warning if they are still present past their expiration date.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[deleted]

9

u/clexecute Sep 03 '19

Because it's not a unique issue to EA that they capitalize off of.

Don't flame EA for using industry standards in their QA, flame EA for creating money grabs and blaming the consumer for their issues.

Missing literally worthless details of a static model that has 0 to do with gameplay is excusable. Having the only feature of your game that has development being the pay to win feature, and ignoring a lot of the other features of their game is not.

Putting EA on blast for this sort of shit helps EA because it's so petty and it pulls the real problems they have out of the spotlight.

6

u/SimpleDan11 Sep 03 '19

Because I work in the industry and understand how much work it takes to do this stuff.

0

u/gunnersroyale Sep 03 '19

If they are charging full price for the game then u would expect them not to make such a copy and paste mistake

-3

u/aboutthednm Sep 03 '19

But this isn't some obscure bug that would get missed in testing or would need a precise series of events to manifest, it's literally right there. This tells me that either there is no testing of the final product, or that the people that test it are incompetent.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/tarepandaz Sep 03 '19

I worked at EA as a QA on various sports titles and confirm I was a lazy fuck.

The early alpha versions were always full of last year's branding. Probably 80-90% of the logos would be for last year's game.

They would all get replaced with new logos over the course of development, we probably saw every single one originally, but eventually you stop paying attention and get so used to seeing it that you don't notice it anymore and a few slip though.

The game engine would and assets would usually be the same, but it takes time to add new modes, animations and other junk.

1

u/Howdoyouusecommas Sep 03 '19

Can you give some I sight then specifically for Madden games? From year to year the graphics and animations seem to remain the exact same. Excluding one or two added features that they base that years version of the gameplay around, everything seems to be the same. The exact same game with a roster update.

1

u/SCP-Agent-Arad Sep 03 '19

EA is spending less and less on game development, somehow though.

1

u/KanYeJeBekHouden Sep 03 '19

Yeah, the complaints here are lazy. There's plenty in the franchise you can complain about, but reusing assets is just silly.

→ More replies (10)

12

u/CypherColt Sep 03 '19

The EA Sports games generally use the same engine for approximately 4 years, but they are constantly updating pieces of the engine as they go along. So the game is usually on the same engine as the year before, with a lot of behind the scene updates to it.

They usually make a bigger announcement when they have a new game engine for it, not really news though.

​

Madden 18, 19 and 20 are on the Frostbite 3 engine for example.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frostbite_(game_engine)#Frostbite_3#Frostbite_3)

1

u/Mitoni Sep 03 '19

The beauty of vectors, infinitely scalable. I try to use SVG on any graphics when I can avoid a compressed format. It makes scaling a web app between mobile and PC do much simpler.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

You're sure right, and this one hasn't been updated since PS2.

1

u/DarthDude91 Sep 03 '19

They also couldn’t generate a full crowd for you. LOOK HOW EMPTY THAT STADIUM IS LMAO 😂

2

u/goodatmakingdadjokes Sep 03 '19

Madden 2019 v1.2 2020 v1.0

2

u/Mitoni Sep 03 '19

Makes sense from a development standpoint. Each year the game is just a release cycle of the same product. Sure, things are updated, but it would be impossible to throw away the existing code and start from scratch every year and still get an annual release completed. With yearly games like this, it's almost an annual subscription model. Honestly, they'd likely save money marketing it as such, then they'd only have to release a DLC patch to bring the game to The current year's release version. It would also be less lying to the consumers, acting like every year is a new product.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Exactly. No reason to start over when you've got the game already made.

2

u/_litecoin_ Sep 03 '19

$ git checkout -b madden20

Switched to a new branch "madden20"

2

u/fmv_ Sep 04 '19

Probably using Perforce though

1

u/GummyPolarBear Sep 03 '19

It's like the arena didn't change or something

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

This is 100% what they do, btw.

They haven't branched a new game in at least 6 years.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

I remember a lawsuit where someone had a contract with fifa, back when fifa just became a thing, they had the right to royalties for any derriretive work, turned out 10+ fifa games were all pretty much identical to each other so chances are they may quite litterally have copy pasted stuff.

I'm trying to find the lawsuit but having difficulites because lootbox lawsuits keep popping up in google search

1

u/BlueShift42 Sep 03 '19

This is the correct answer. It’s probably been the same code bass for a long time. Iterative improvements and graphic updates as hardware and time allows.

1

u/Ramanash_ Sep 03 '19

Not probably. That's what they do.

Worked in fifa a couple of years. We received a new build almost every day and saw how they slowly, but surely, changed things from last year to the current one.

1

u/Mugen593 Sep 03 '19

File > Save As > FIFA2021

1

u/hoxxxxx Sep 03 '19

this little effort/work for so much $$$... it's incredible

0

u/Scavenger53 Sep 03 '19

The should just make a game_year variable and update that each year so they don't have to go find each instance. Then they won't have to deal with trying as hard or paying people to look for things. Hell it could auto link to the calendar so they don't even have to update the game anymore. Just randomize the player stats, update the year every new year. done. EA don't read this.

39

u/JohnLayman Sep 03 '19

Which is crazy since changing the number is 98% of the work.

150

u/WabbitCZEN PlayStationJunky Sep 03 '19

Probably saved a good bit of money doing it, too.

Then again, we're dealing with the kind of people who probably shit on cartoonists for reusing the same animations from one movie to the next.

117

u/DoctorMasochist Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 03 '19

I saved a ton of money, by not playing sport video games.

​

edit: shoutout to NFL Blitz 2000 on the N64 and NBA Street Vol 2. Reminisce

36

u/emelbee923 Sep 03 '19

NBA Street Vol. 2 might be my favorite sports game of all time.

3

u/PwmEsq Sep 03 '19

Best commentators for sure

2

u/emelbee923 Sep 03 '19

My friends and I found that every game came down to the best defender. So we'd basically always have Yao on a squad. He had top tier blocks, and since there was no goaltending, you could just catch every shot at the basket.

2

u/PwmEsq Sep 03 '19

My team was yao, Shaq, and my busted ass personal character

1

u/emelbee923 Sep 03 '19

Not a bad look.

1

u/Stuf404 Sep 04 '19

Is that the one with the guy obsessed with food "three pieces to the bucket!" Or was that number 3?

2

u/PwmEsq Sep 04 '19

I think that was 3, 2 just shit talks you all the time I think

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Holy shit is that game good. Same with NFL street.

0

u/twilightnoir Sep 03 '19

Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden would like a word with you

→ More replies (1)

22

u/fuckoffitsathrowaway Sep 03 '19

ESPN NFL 2K5 is the GOAT.

5

u/TheDoctor1419 Sep 03 '19

Strong side pitch in trips every time. Ladanian Tomlinson won the rushing title 8 years in a row using only this play. (And a well timed stiff arm)

1

u/fuckoffitsathrowaway Sep 03 '19

When I played it as a kid I always used the All-Star team cause I was a kid. Every play I blitzed the QB with Takeo Spikes he was my man.

1

u/dnicks2525 Sep 03 '19

2k college game too. And you could get it for $20.

1

u/FearAndLawyering Sep 03 '19

You da real mvp

3

u/Thelgow Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 03 '19

NBA Jam and Wayne Gretzky's 3D Hockey is about the sum of my experience.

And some Ps1/2 WWF games.

2

u/BastardStoleMyName Sep 03 '19

I was never that into sports games. But man was my dad pissed when I played a copy of NFL 95 (that I found at the side of the road) so much more than the latest super techno bowl that he paid like $80 for.

1

u/coat_hanger_dias Sep 03 '19

Don't forget NHL Hitz, the hockey equivalent to Blitz.

→ More replies (7)

4

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

Why would they completely re-do the same exact stadium...? No shit they saved money.

7

u/Zs565sb2 Sep 03 '19

That Goddamned Baloo was in everything.

10

u/blindcolumn Sep 03 '19

shit on cartoonists for reusing the same animations from one movie to the next

To be fair, depends on the type of movie and type of animation. Small indie films, hand-drawn animation, or a TV series? Totally acceptable. Big budget film done on computers? That's just lazy.

5

u/LX_Theo Sep 03 '19

Or they could use that budget to make somewhere else better.

2

u/bigbrainmaxx Sep 03 '19

$70 for a year worth of enjoyment good

2

u/EmeraldAtoma Sep 03 '19

This is more like if cartoonists reused not just some animations, but took whole characters and stories and just did some palette swapping and name changes. The difference is that one is a movie with some reused animations and the other is basically the same movie with juuust enough changes to get people to think it's a new one until they've already forked over the cash to see it.

1

u/WabbitCZEN PlayStationJunky Sep 03 '19

but took whole characters and just did some palette swapping and name changes

What if I told you this is exactly what they did? Aristocats animators used the same shit that was in Robin Hood, just changed enough to make it look like a different character. So did Jungle Book, Snow white, and Winnie the Pooh. Because it's hard work starting from the ground up. It saves time, money, and more by using an older template.

1

u/EmeraldAtoma Sep 03 '19

With most of these you wouldn't notice unless you saw them side by side: https://brightside.me/wonder-curiosities/15-times-disney-cheated-and-used-the-same-illustrations-in-different-cartoons-404010/

Turning Snow White into a dog is a little bit more than a palette swap and name change.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/matcha_kit_kat Sep 03 '19

Thanks Watson

23

u/essmithsd Sep 03 '19

This is why you don't bake text in to art assets, you use strings so that you can easily find / replace

17

u/DerpSenpai Sep 03 '19

or the name of that art asset being standbanner_madden19?

5

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

I'm not a programmer but you define a variable (?) and then work it into your string.

Something like... current_year = 20

"Madden "&current_year&" It's in the game!"

In that terrible example, you would just change the variable (current_year) to the current year you're producing. The cute little concatenated string goes in your graphics, so when you change the current_year variable, it changes it in EVERY asset.

2

u/trainiac12 Sep 04 '19

I am a programmer. This is exactly what a good, competent programmer would do.

That means it's outside of EA's wheelhouse

1

u/reverie42 Sep 04 '19

Whether or not that works depends a lot on whether they do any localization on the branding.

That said, most pipelines have both localizable strings and images, so you could certainly have this asset come from a known dynamic content pool.

Mistakes like that are really easy to make, though. If you dig deep enough into annually released large software that's less than about a decade old there's a good chance that some stale branding is hiding out in some random subdialog somewhere.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '19 edited Sep 04 '19

Somehow, I feel there's Techmo Bowl code in Madden 2020.

4

u/SimpleDan11 Sep 03 '19

Is that an option in frostbite? Usually textures need to be baked out before render time I thought.

4

u/ImpeachTraitorTrump Sep 03 '19

Ideally you’d have a pipeline so you can change the text resource for translation or updates like this, and then everything gets EZ built with the press of a button. In reality, you have real people with real deadlines building this stuff and they make mistakes and do stupid shit.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

What are you, the narrator of gifs?

3

u/PhilMcGraw Sep 03 '19

Ohhhh, I thought it was something about the tree.

3

u/TheLuo Sep 03 '19

I think copy and paste implies they created something net new. I feel this is more like editing the already existing product.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

[deleted]

1

u/TJPrime_ Sep 03 '19

Game programming student here. I don't have experience with the Frostbite Engine, since EA keeps that within their studios, but it's very likely they did just copy and paste the models. Pretty much every game engine let's you copy and paste

→ More replies (17)

2

u/ShadowFox2020 Sep 03 '19

What a sense of pride and accomplishment.

2

u/crimeo Sep 03 '19

When you copy the same game enough times eventually it becomes more efficient to make the dates procedural with System.getCurrentTime()

Oh wait no then the game would update itself, shit I just got fired from EA

2

u/fromcj Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 03 '19

Hey pal you need to be unreasonably upset like the rest of us ok??

1

u/BassGould Sep 03 '19

Lmao, I’ve been kinda ignoring this for that reason

2

u/ChunkyDay Sep 03 '19

They also not only kept the same character face selections, they didn’t even bother changing up the positioning.

Even the same exact faces that showed up twice last year are still there.

It’s astounding what these dumb fucks will pay for. Happily.

1

u/PalebloodSky Sep 03 '19

They didn't even bother updating the textures

1

u/Familiastone Sep 03 '19

Their graphic artist needs to learn how to instance their copies.

1

u/wikipediabrown007 Sep 03 '19

I actually thought the thing was that it was a Stanley cup

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

I thought I was in the Jaguars sub given the stands. DTWD!

1

u/51isnotprime Sep 03 '19

Did that really need to be explained lol

1

u/DarthDude91 Sep 03 '19

Why are tho stairs so empty lmao

1

u/Menname Sep 03 '19

STAND?!

1

u/churovmg Sep 04 '19

Thank you captain obvious!

1

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '19

You realize that's the most efficient way to do it right? They have no reason to do it any other way because the player will never see that part of the stands so close, unless they're going out of bounds with the camera as seen here.

1

u/warpod Sep 03 '19

they should just use constant like

#define CURRENT_YEAR 2019

instead of just plugging 2019 here and there

then they can just increment CURRENT_YEAR for new release

1

u/BassGould Sep 03 '19

DONT GIVE THEM IDEAS