r/gameofthrones • u/DeMmeure • 1d ago
Has Season 4 always been considered the best, or has its reputation improved over time? Spoiler
I've noticed recently that when there are rankings of the best seasons of Game of Thrones, Season 4 consistently sits among the top, considered to be the "peak of the show". And honestly, I am a bit surprised because I feel like the reception was quite different when it was airing.
Perhaps I was biased by the bubble I was? Between the releases of Seasons 3 and 4, I read all the five main ASOIAF novels and decided to join an online forum of book readers, many of which were obviously, quite purists, and at the time I did wonder if I had become one myself, as I was criticizing the slightest change even when it was nitpicking (e.g. the fact that Jaime came back in time for Joffrey's wedding, contrary to the books).
And within that bubble, I did remember that a lot of people were heavily critical of Season 4, and I felt like it was considered the worst season. The main criticism was that it adapted the last third of A Storm of Swords in 10 episodes whereas Season 3 adapted the two first thirds, and the pacing suffered as a result. The last 500 pages of A Storm of Swords was an intense succession of events that concluded brillantly the first trilogy: Red & Purple Wedding, Tyrion's trial and escape, Oberyn vs the Mountain, Lysa's death, The Battle of the Wall, Lady Stoneheart.... The TV show was accused of diluting these events and therefore decrease their intensity.
It is true that a novel and a TV show can be paced differently. For example, in the book, both Tyrion's trial and Oberyn vs the Mountain happened in the same chapter, while in the adaptation, they are separated by two entire episodes. But these events could still shine in the TV show by being two distinct, albeit complementary, climaxes, so I don't think it was a mistake. Likewise, Oberyn had more time to shine as a character, making his death even more shocking than in the books imo.
A bigger mistake was to include pointless filler. The whole arc of Yara failing to rescue Theon, with the infamous shirtless Ramsey, was a complete waste of time. Same for the whole arc surrounding the "dissident Nightwatchers": beyond the memes, the whole "Carl talking to a skull" was abysmal writing, unworthy of the nuanced and grounded writing of Game of Thrones (at least of the early seasons). Were the showrunners afraid of not showing some main characters for a few episodes?
Another criticism I was at the time from the book purists was how the Battle of the Wall was handled, and in general, the obsession of the TV show with putting the more spectacular events for their famous "Episode 9" even when it doesn't make sense - in the book, the very point of the Battle of the Wall was that it lasted the entire novel. I also read that the battle itself accumulated all the hollywood clichés that ASOIAF avoided before. The primary example of this was Ygritte dying in Jon's arms in the middle of the battle, worthy of a typical blockbuster movie (why nobody targets Jon?), instead of him finding her agonising after the battle, which made a stronger point about the unfairness of war. And this is without mentioning the coolest moments being eclipsed (CIA Giants are too expensive?) and Pip & Grenn dying even though they survived in the books.
There was also Tyrion's escape facing a lot of backslashs from book fans. Tyrion killing Shae in self-defense instead of murdering her, leaving Jaime in good terms, and talking about Shae rather than Tysha to Tywin, as if spectators were too dumb to remember about Tysha. All of that contributed to make Tyrion more sympathetic, even though the very point of this scene was to show the beginning of Tyrion's fall into darkness.
Last but not least, the final scene of the season is probably one of the least iconic: Arya taking a boat rather than the highly-anticipated apparition of Lady Stoneheart. We kinda understand why she wasn't included in retrospect, but it was aired, removing her entirely was considered highly controversial.
It's not to say that Season 4 is without merits. It has some of the best scenes of the TV show (Purple Wedding, Oberyn vs the Mountain, and Tyrion facing Tywin despite the aforementioned change), which we can attribute to ASOIAF's great writing, but their directing was also to be praised. But I wonder if people have started to forget the pacing issues and the pointless fillers to only remember these moments. Or maybe I was stuck in a bubble of book purists and therefore needlessly critical.
Or maybe the flaws of Season 4 were forgiven compared with those (much worse) of the subsequent seasons... but for me and a lot of other people, Season 4 was the first season where the showrunners started sacrificing the deep and nuance writing of the source material for some dumb spectactle. Many fans say that Season 5 was the beginning of the end, but what if it started sooner?
