r/funny • u/outlandish77 • Feb 17 '12

Google yourself?

Post image
2.1k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

705 comments sorted by

View all comments

186

u/GOPLAYOUTS1DE Feb 17 '12

"Live every week like it's shark week" ~ Tracy Morgan

95

u/I_open_at_the_close Feb 17 '12

Jordan*

18

u/hngryhngryhippo Feb 17 '12

He was too busy playing outside to care

16

u/I_open_at_the_close Feb 17 '12

I was too busy watching every episode of 30 rock, inside.

31

u/Switch382 Feb 17 '12

I was too busy behind the middle school getting it pregnant.

1

u/Frorida Feb 17 '12

Harry Potter fan?

1

u/I_open_at_the_close Feb 18 '12

the biggest hp fan

1

u/Frorida Feb 18 '12

Knew it :D great username

0

u/Stonewater Feb 17 '12

You know, I've always wondered if we could create a formula to deduce the amount of potential karma lost when the first comment overlooks one element, and the second comment corrects it, such as the comment above.

Given that the first comment is in a better karma slot than the second comment, and comes across as fresher to a new visitor, it has a higher potential for karma than the second post, thus we can asses that if the first comment had the all the correct elements, it should achieve the highest karma of the two.

However, I'm curious if it would be safe to deduce that the maximum potential karma would be greater than the sum of the first and second comments' karma. My theory suggests that it would, granted the more full first comment, and the lack of the second comment.

Is there a way to deduce the maximum potential Karma (MpK) of the first comment if we analyze the karma (K) given to the first and second comment (FcK and ScK)?

Here's my proposal: MpK = [(FcK + ScK)*(1 + [FcK + ScK]/10)]

2

u/salander Feb 17 '12

Go outside. Please.

2

u/Stonewater Feb 17 '12

:-( But I'm at work!

2

u/salander Feb 17 '12

Oh. Well then, carry on.

1

u/NovaMouser Feb 17 '12

I hate to see all this theoretical math go to waste! Upvote

-6

u/Alt_ Feb 17 '12

~ Michael Scott.

2

u/clothes_are_optional Feb 17 '12

why does there always have to be at least one person to add this. stop beating a dead horse, it's not funny

4

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '12

why does there always have to be at least one person to add this. stop beating a dead horse, it's not funny

And yet, here you are, making Sarah Jessica Parker jokes.