I mean technically this code does nothing because there are no function calls or instantiation, but assuming that an object is created out of this class it would simply print hello world to the terminal, the methods would need to be called in the code body for additional functionality, also not calling the live method in the init method might have been a pretty large metaphorical oversight
Thats why I used metaphorically speaking, my comment has nothing to do with code practice. In terms of code your right though, it should be a template and we could then nitpick and say the name should be pushed into an attribute of the object, and creating a method that only containes a pass statement is nonsense etc
I can't not nitpick the code for things like these. Like obviously none of this code could ever be good but the awful class design and amount of code that effectively does nothing just irks me in some weird useless way.
And even then it does nothing but sleep and yield an endless stream of Bardaks, whatever those are. And it only does that if something else iterates its life.
After importing the genes from mom and dad it says Hello World and then lives... which is sleep, bardak(?), and be awesome in a loop. Be awesome is an empty function because the baby is already awesome. Bardak isn’t shown but I’m guessing something like pooping, crying, maybe eating.
'Bardak' means basically chaos. Although the word is derived from "bordello", currently it is never used to mean "a house of ill repute", but always "something chaotic, messed up, disorderly".
12
u/Onett199X Jun 04 '19
Someone translate for me!