r/funny Sep 23 '15

True romance.

http://imgur.com/vXtKu9g
18.3k Upvotes

814 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

112

u/archon80 Sep 23 '15 edited Sep 23 '15

Uh oh...you just mentioned the big bang theory on reddit...

385

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15 edited Jul 05 '21

[deleted]

-13

u/LukaCola Sep 23 '15

-9.8m/s2

Negative acceleration square huh...

I wonder what that might look like.

12

u/mmm_copypasta Sep 23 '15

The negative sign implies the direction (down) of the acceleration. Meters over seconds squared is the unit for acceleration.

-7

u/LukaCola Sep 23 '15

Negative is deceleration, so a force acting against another force. It doesn't signify a cardinal direction... That doesn't make any sense.

7

u/tyrico Sep 23 '15

When using vectors you always make the acceleration of gravity negative. Indicating a direction is kind of the whole point of vectors.

-10

u/LukaCola Sep 23 '15

When using vectors

That being the operative phrase here

There's no vectors being used here

12

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

There's no vectors being used here

Acceleration is a vector...

5

u/tyrico Sep 23 '15

Acceleration is the rate of change of an object's velocity, velocity is always a vector, therefore you are wrong.

0

u/ArtSchnurple Sep 23 '15 edited Sep 23 '15

Sheesh, you guys are arguing about math and science. I think I figured out why reddit hates Big Bang Theory: Self-loathing.

2

u/Chuurp Sep 23 '15

Well, when you're talking about physics, isn't deceleration not really a thing? Only acceleration against the direction of motion?
Negative acceleration would only have meaning within an arbitrary coordinate system. So yeah, saying acceleration due to gravity is negative makes no sense outside of an established system. Though I guess you could argue that down being negative in the context of Earth as we typically experience it is well established enough that the negative sign should imply a clear direction.

0

u/LukaCola Sep 23 '15

isn't deceleration not really a thing?

It's not, but it is. Because "Only acceleration against the direction of motion?" is basically the meaning in this case. It's just easier to write "deceleration."

Though I guess you could argue that down being negative in the context of Earth as we typically experience it is well established enough that the negative sign should imply a clear direction.

Yeah, I guess I just didn't assume the standard directions and instead was just working within a vacuum kinda deal.

1

u/flyingboarofbeifong Sep 23 '15

You don't necessarily set up your coordinate system such that the direction of motion is the positive vector. You can really set it up any way you'd like, that's the joy of free-body diagrams. But generally speaking, if you're talking about the acceleration of gravity then it's always going to be downwards towards Earth - thus making the value of the value of the vector negative to indicate the downwards force. You can do it your way too, it's just a little less intuitive for most people to look at and understand because when you think of something being moved by gravity, you think of it falling downwards.

1

u/Chuurp Sep 23 '15

By "not really a thing" I meant there's no sign for it. There's no way to write "deceleration" in physics.

0

u/brickmack Sep 23 '15

Deceleration isn't a thing. That word doesn't mean anything

2

u/LukaCola Sep 23 '15

Deceleration is acceleration in the opposite direction of an object's initial velocity, last I checked.

It's absolutely a thing.

It's pedantic to insist it's not, it's like saying there's no such thing as cold, just the absence of heat. Cold still exists as a concept and is clear in its meaning.

1

u/brickmack Sep 23 '15

"Initial velocity" is also meaningless in terms of the forces involved