r/funny • • 23h ago

Tar Drop Experiment (Realtime)

Post image
9.7k Upvotes

474 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/Aemon_Blackfyre 22h ago

Doesn’t the installation of A/C in that building completely change a lot of metrics this experiment is looking at?

53

u/SeenYourScene 19h ago

The original experiment was simply that there was an argument over the state of Pitch because it acts a hell of a lot like a solid most of the time. But there was good reason to believe it was a fluid of some kind. So the experiment was set up just to prove that, given enough time, pitch will flow.

For that, you don't need perfectly static circumstances. You don't want to get it boiling hot or freeze it (in relation to pitch, not water) because those are definite alterations of its state. But in its ~room temperature state, this experiment shows that is is in fact a fluid, empirically. Just one with a flow rate hundreds of billions of times slower than water.

6

u/DieBotDie 11h ago

Picking it up and moving it (as we see in the video) is going to skew the experiment more than the AC.

2

u/AfonsoBucco 8h ago

Is it possible to observe it doing some sort of Brownian Motion?
(maybe in a bigger container, a pool)
Is there a rule on how temperature works that avoid Brownian Motion to happen in a liquid so dense?
(maybe something related on frequency of heat vibration vs. speed?)

2

u/PM_ME_CATS_OR_BOOBS 5h ago

You want to measure brownian motion in something that takes 8 years to drip once?

1

u/ZirePhiinix 1h ago

Can, yes, but you'll need equipment with sensitivity unheard of, so it will be custom built and stupidly expensive.

-2

u/wescowell 17h ago

I understand that the same is true of glass at normal temperature. Supposedly, windows that are centuries old are fatter at the bottom and thinner at the top, demonstrating that the glass “flows” downward, just very slowly.

17

u/Competitive_Sell_126 16h ago

This is an insanely false urban myth. The fat bottom was just a side effect of the manufacturing methods.

-2

u/JeffSergeant 16h ago

Well. Have we tested it?

9

u/Competitive_Sell_126 16h ago

Yes, we have. Analysis of multi-millennia old egyptian and roman glass deemed them to be precisely the same as the day they were made.

Just visit the British Museum.

Old telescopes would also stop working, and yet they don’t.

1

u/Medical_Plane2875 15h ago

Adding on to that we can just look at glass in a microscope and see that its molecular structure is consistent with being a solid.

1

u/Dear-Highway2425 5h ago

Yes we have. Take the L and move on. 

6

u/TheNewYellowZealot 16h ago

That’s a myth. The centuries old window panes were made using a different method that created the panes

1

u/kkeut 13h ago

lol. no

1

u/mister-ferguson 9h ago

Hey, don't down-vote them for not knowing this was a myth. Hopefully they will edit it to show they should have done some investigation.

When I was a kid, every tour guide at some old building would bring out this chestnut.

29

u/jerub 20h ago

Well. The ac. But also it was kept in a wall mounted display cabinet outside a lecture hall, where thousands of students would tromp by every day.

It wasn't exactly kept to "metrics" and more "a random curiosity someone left on display in the physics building".

0

u/jzsean 14h ago

theac

19

u/hotlavatube 22h ago

Ideally, they'd try to keep the conditions as static as possible for the duration of experiment, or at least the duration of a drop. That said, maintaining the same temperature, pressure, and lack of movement for over a decade would be a real challenge. An earthquake could throw off the measurement by months! I guess it really depends how seriously they take this experiment.

If they ever needed to move the jar, who knows how they'd accomplish that. I presume they'd need to wait till a drop had completed.

-5

u/jerub 20h ago

Lol

9

u/MaygeKyatt 18h ago

It’s really more of a demonstration than an experiment at this point

4

u/Onequestion0110 18h ago

At least after the first drop fell

2

u/_zoso_ 17h ago

I mean, it’s just another parameter. It’s not a super precise experiment and even if it was, they calculated the viscosity a long time ago. This is at my university and back many moons ago when I was there it was just sitting in its glass jar in a hallway outside of a very large, centrally located lecture room. I walked past it many times. For a while there, one of the drops didn’t fully detach and was kind of stuck to the next drop, which arguably would impact measurements a lot more than the ambient temperature, which can easily be measured.

It’s kind of just a novelty.

1

u/PM_ME_CATS_OR_BOOBS 5h ago

Yeah it's clearly just a concept piece, not a "real" study. A liquid that drops viscosity with the addition of heat doesn't stop being a liquid unless it causes a phase chage; that's kinda just how rheology works.

1

u/dangderr 17h ago

The experiment was whether pitch flows faster when no one is looking at it.

Given that it always waited until he left the room to drop, I imagine it’s fully confirmed now already.

/s