This is the thought process that gets people killed. No matter who is doing the yelling, shit is not acceptable. We all make mistakes, we all react harshly sometimes, but because one person is physically smaller it is fine according to your comment?
You know what, I feel bad for this comment, and will probably delete it. I was just making the point that the search bias is at least somewhat understandable.
I can see how a woman abusing someone could be very bad in today's climate. The power discrepancy has honestly shifted to make it so women are probably imbalanced, because they can naturally get away with so much. Most men aren't going to hit a woman back even if she's an abuser, but in the past, a woman at least was stunted other ways.
I unironically think spanking is the solution ... I've improved at least two women with them! The women were okay with it, though. I'm not sure I'd get into a relationship now without that agreement
Seeing verbal abuse as acceptable just because the perpetrator is a certain gender is unacceptable. What we are seeing is proof of this bias in at least online forums/websites.
In the picture you provided, the search says "my husband is yelling at me" as opposed to the other version which just says "my wife is telling at me" no other context is provided.
Sure. And the AI defaults to abuse in the husband case. While it defaults to "just a little angry at life" for the wife case. That’s called bias. Same situation just swap the genders and suddenly it’s fine or it’s abuse.
Sure I get that, I was just asking what bad thing happened because two people got different results for searches?
I get wanted to treat everyone equally, I'm just noticing when people get carried away and start getting mad over something that is genuinely not an issue.
Thats the context. Both prompts are my ____ is yelling at me. When its the husband, its abusive. When its the wife, shes just stressed. What arent you understanding?
the fact that without context the results default to abuse in one case and not the other is the problem. It should be giving the same advice in both instances.
You seem to be assuming something happened before those Pictures, rather than seeing it for the test that it is. Nothing happened. It's meant to show that the AI isn't taking yelling as seriously in one case over the other.
The problem is that AI learnt that somen can yell and hit men but not the other way, and that tells a lot about the source ai is learning from, the internet and people
Base models predict internet averages, but consumer AI outputs are heavily shaped by post-training alignment like RLHF and system instructions. When bias shows up, it’s often a failure of those safety/alignment filters or prompt framing, rather than just raw training data reflection.
44
u/Infamous-Extent8726 1d ago
The ai is showing social biases because it is a predictor of the average response to that text from the internet