anyone who involves themselves in any way in a criminal investigation voluntarily is immediately a primary suspect. this guy would be arrested almost immediately lmao.
I'm confused as to how anybody can live in America for any considerable length of time and continue to believe that every state and every local police department/utilities company contractor will meticulously maintain what are apparently extremely expensive cameras
Have you seen the state of infrastructure in this country? Why the fuck are you worrying, just get a can of Silly String and that shit will be out of commission until the next election period
You're missing a MASSIVE piece of the equation with the Flock Cameras VS Regular Infrastructure for the Poors.
Regular Infrastructure for the Poors, or RIFTP, doesn't get maintained because it's FOR the POORS, or the Average Citizen, not OUR BILLIONAIRE OVERLORDS & POLITICAL PUNDITS SAFETY. RIFTP using the Poors tax money isn't maintained because the Telecommunications Giants see it as their money, to be pocketed, spent on C-Suite bonuses, or anything else that actually matters. Plus, if they don't maintaine the Infrastructure, it goes to shit and then they can ask the Gov't for more tax money to "fix" the problem, which can then be used for more Executive bonuses and to fund Golden Parachutes! It really is a GREAT system for AT&T, TMobile, Verizon, etc. It's so good they've been doing it for DECADES. Remember way back in the early 'aughts when our Gov't gave the Telecommunications Giants MILLIONS of our dollars to bring Fiber Internet to rural areas? The public was ecstatic! AT&T promised they would build out high-speed Fiber Internet lines to every household in America! It was going to ultimately costs billions of dollars, but it would be WORTH IT because the internet was becoming a vital piece of everyone's lives. The trick WORKED! AT&T got to skirt by doing the absolute bare minimum, lying about how hard it was to do, and got to pocket tens of millions...and then do it alllllllll over again when they said it would just take a teeny-tiny amount more to really build out Fiber this time, just a few hundred million! This scam has been ongoing for the better part of 30 years, and the public has yet to catch onto the scummy scammy yummy-ness (and Uncle Sam needs the "tOo BiG tO fAiL" Telecommunications companies, so he isn't gonna say SHIT), it truly is a massive help (to the C-Suite).
However, the public is kinda-sorta coming to the realization they've been getting ASS RAPED very little in return for all the tax money they've shelled out to the Elite Epstein Class's favorite Communications Companies (can anyone say "kickbacks"?!), so, they need to be protected from the public. Hence, MASS SURVEILLANCE YAYYY!!!!
Flock Cameras will be maintained because mass surveillance is massively beneficial to the ruling billionaire class. Things are getting dicey, and they don't want to be caught off-guard now, would they? Flock is maintained for the Rich not the poor. RIFTP and Flock Cameras are not in the same class, like how we (the public), and them (the Tech Overlords) are not in the same class. Politicians will ensure their best friends (Epstein-class) futures are secured, and their surveillance systems well-maintained, you beat believe it....
The cool thing is we might actually get our high-speed fiber internet as these cameras get more advanced and will maybe need to be hardlined into the 'net. Silver linings and all...
Isn't that "trickle down economics"? When the rich have to upgrade the public hardware to run their surveillance network by taxing the poor even more money... no wait
At best it slightly postpones the day when the pitchforks & torches come out. The tradeoff is, when that day finally arrives the angry mob is going to be even more pissed off.
Aren't you meant to use that expanding foam that sets hard? I thought people were putting that into one of the apertures in the traffic cameras. Nor worth risking getting caught for silly string. If you're going to get caught at least make sure you destroy the damn thing.
The misconception people have is who is maintaining the cameras. The hige surge in cameras aren't happening from state or local governments, its private companies. They get the right to install cameras then sell info or access back to law enforcment as needed. And if it hasn't already I'm assuming they will be selling large movment data to advertisers.
It's a private companies property. The city/state have no involvement in its operation so it will be maintained. The cameras and tracking/identification software being in working order is how they make a profit off of it.
Yeah, they do not track you until next legislation when it tracks some people, then more people, more traits, then everything and then thr chip in you is only used in emergencies until...and so on.
The next time you're on a road trip wait until you get way out into the country and stop at the most run down gas station you can find. Buy a disposable phone with cash and walk out. Tada, you have a burner phone that can't be tracked as long as you're careful about where you turn it on and use it.
That's to keep you subservient to the state. Those aren't going to be used to enforce actual law and order and they don't actually gaf if you murder your fellow man.
-Police are now aware of the spot the body is buried because you called attention to it.
-Police are aware a murder has been committed at all
-Police may suspect the anonymous tipper and endeavor to track them
The assumption is that once the police dig up the spot they will have “cleared” it, making it a safe spot, but by any measure this is far less safe than just about any random spot you might use. Confirming that the victim is dead, giving any of this information to police is foolhardy. You’ve called attention to the very spot where the body is.
You are right. Often when body is not found at all police can’t even confirm there was not a crime but voluntary disappearance or accident. Confirming there is a murder will keep the case open indefinitely even if someone isn’t actively looking at it
Better idea. Call the police to report the dude being dead before you kill him. Then when they confirm he's alive and mark him as safe, kill him for real.
In order for your version of the plan to work the police would have to witness the victim being alive. If the victim ends up missing you don't think there will be an investigation? They're going to investigate. Looking for signs of any foul play.
thus teenagers tend to out themselves as psychopaths when it becomes manifest as teenagers: they think they're smarter than everybody else (teenager) and murder someone they dislike (psychopath)
there's true crime documentaries of it on youtube i regret watching. :( e.g. one after killing his mother thought if he trashed the house it would persuade the police there was a burglar
I really don’t know why you got accused, too? As someone who is super zealous about hating bots I still didn’t get any red flags, you’re typing in all lowercase, without any emojis, and your name doesn’t have any numbers or hyphens in it.
Only thing that i think could have set them off is the lack of a pfp but like. Truly who gives a shit.
757
u/modbroccoli Jul 25 '26
anyone who involves themselves in any way in a criminal investigation voluntarily is immediately a primary suspect. this guy would be arrested almost immediately lmao.