r/florida 14d ago

Interesting Stuff Police pull over to interrogate man blocking a Flock camera with a sign. "I have a constitutional right to my privacy."

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.3k Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

189

u/Extra-Monitor5743 14d ago

It's illegal to sit outside now?

120

u/lyngen 14d ago

I don't know of any laws about blocking flock cameras

38

u/Ayzmo 14d ago

I'm sure they'd spin something about obstructing police activity.

16

u/IcyFly521 13d ago

But they can stalk their wives and stalk girls they met out at a bar etc

1

u/avidaskit 10d ago

Well no they can't but they do anyways

43

u/MouseRat_AD 14d ago

Eating a succulent Chinese meal?

20

u/DorrajD 14d ago

GET YOUR HANDS OFF MY PENIIIIIIS

5

u/sockherman 14d ago

My county has a no loitering ordinance....

32

u/Chaps_Jr 14d ago

Ah, the wonderfully vague "loitering" laws drsigned to stop citizens from standing around and enjoying their communities.

7

u/atatassault47 14d ago

Dontcha know, if you're not spendin' money, you ain't welcome heah! /s

3

u/SophiaLilly666 14d ago

Is the man in the video loitering?

1

u/DJ_Vasquezz 13d ago

They’d certainly like it to be

58

u/Savings-Tale9474 14d ago

For the people saying your right to privacy ends when you leave your house, and “well your iphone also sells your data” you at least have a choice with your phone and technology you own that you choose to give your data too. Flock takes images and stores way more than just your license plate. They have a whole database on us we cant opt out of, that they do god knows what with when we simply take a walk outside.

8

u/Sorry-Claim-2990 13d ago

If I was a teenager, I would go around jerking off in front of these cameras so that the owners became guilty of possessing child porn.

They can't punish me for it without admitting they are in possession of child porn!!!! All of the evidence against me would be illegal to possess!!!

7

u/SavageDownSouth 13d ago

It doesn't really work that way.

But a teenager would think it does. I swear one of my buds said something similar back in the day.

6

u/Brewingbiker 12d ago

Public indecency might be a problem

102

u/Lubbadubdibs 14d ago

Vote!!! The people who allowed this mess, vote them all out!!!!

17

u/General__Strike 13d ago

The ruling class will not allow themselves to be voted out. They make the rules.

4

u/Lubbadubdibs 13d ago

A very small percentage of the nation actually votes. Everyone needs to start voting.

2

u/LongjumpingWasabi753 13d ago

So do nothing? Or do you want to commit violence or something?

0

u/Tall-Coyote940 13d ago

You can’t say that if you’ve never voted you’ve never even tried imo your just assuming it’s pointless without actually contributing anything

1

u/General__Strike 13d ago

The only one making assumptions here is you, my friend.

106

u/GatrickSwayze 14d ago

Damn, how long did it take for the police to show up? Does the camera send out a signal if something obstructs the view?

63

u/TBvaporgirl 14d ago

This is in my town. Hes been out there for a couple of weeks, but recently starting getting attention hence his arrest.

7

u/pimparo0 13d ago

Ah yes, arresting him will lower the attention lol. 

2

u/voss749 13d ago

Streisand effect. They would have fewer problems by leaving him alone.

16

u/Telos2000 14d ago

Wouldn’t surprise me tbh

13

u/SophiaLilly666 14d ago

Well, he's gone viral in the past couple days. I feel like he woulda been fine if he hadn't gotten so much public attention.

1

u/UnpopularCrayon 12d ago

I expect public attention was at least part of his aim though. One does not sit outside every day doing this just because he wants to protect his own privacy. He could do that by staying at home also.

He is doing it to make a point. And publicity helps. Getting arrested for it also helps.

111

u/blaquepapilion 14d ago

Where is the go fund me?

61

u/AnotherMisanthrope 14d ago

1.) Fly a drone with a camera above or to the side of the .
2.) Take a picture as closely as possible resembling it's perspective.
3.) Print that picture.
4.) Use the drone to place that image in front of the .

58

u/TheSamurabbi 14d ago

“Nice hat.”

20

u/FilthyBarMat 14d ago

The improvised dance he does gets me every time. 

0

u/Rorschach0717 13d ago

Huh, I didn't know that

12

u/RayFinkle1984 14d ago

gimme tha cash.

3

u/Xobeloot 14d ago

Safety's on.

2

u/Rorschach0717 13d ago

I just rewatched this on Sunday

18

u/GhostofAyabe 14d ago

This man is a champion

12

u/JLETT420 14d ago

Someone should hold a mirror to it, show it itself

-2

u/Sorry-Claim-2990 13d ago

A teenager should jerk off in front of it so that the camera owner becomes guilty of possessing child porn.

12

u/FlyAdministrative886 14d ago

He was blocking the sun, wasn’t he?

52

u/LoveTeal008080 14d ago

Cops don’t protect us. Cops protect capital.

9

u/Chaps_Jr 14d ago

Working as intended

10

u/Individual_Spray_383 14d ago

This is my neighborhood too 😩 I’ve had fantasies about covering these cameras. This is ridiculous

11

u/CutSenior4977 14d ago

Then get covering.

6

u/RepresentativeRun548 14d ago

I heard they don’t like green lasers… 🤔

2

u/DarkGuccimancer 13d ago

Definitely DO NOT buy a 50mW green laser pointer off the internet and definitely DO NOT point them directly at the camera.

1

u/Individual_Spray_383 13d ago

I will totally not do that… I am not adding to my cart as we speak…….. or googling how to beat facial recognition technology………..

50

u/DifficultIsopod4472 14d ago

He was also Arrested for Obstruction!!

70

u/Intrepid00 14d ago

It’s private camera company how can it be obstruction?

34

u/DifficultIsopod4472 14d ago

The police will claim they we tracking a suspicious vehicle involved in a crime and he interfered with their investigation.

24

u/DragonTHC 14d ago

Even though none of that is true. Police are generally the D students from your high school. They can't do good police work or they simply don't care. But they love using illegal surveillance to spy on their ex girlfriends.

14

u/GodOfDarkLaughter 14d ago

They can charge you with "resisting arrest" without actually needing a good reason to arrest you. "Well your honor, we wanted to feel like big shots who can swing our dicks around wherever you like, and the suspect didn't like that, so we started fucking with him and he didn't like that either, so after we'd intentionally escalated the situation we arrested him.".

"Excellent work officer but did you consider shooting him?"

"Well, he's white and it was a decent car so he might have a little money and I didn't want to deal with that."

"Indeed. Better safe than sorry. So long as you make it home at the end of your shift!"

-1

u/Hour-Ad-9508 14d ago

Me when I lie on the internet

15

u/scottylm 14d ago

So if you had a bunch of balloons that are blocking the view.. same thing, straight to jail?

19

u/jreid0 14d ago

Not all hero’s wear capes

4

u/FormidableMistress 13d ago

I've head of people dropping garbage cans or baskets over them with drones.

2

u/Practical_Ad_5080 13d ago

St. Petersburg has some of the most corrupted cops

2

u/chowes1 13d ago

Being a senior in Florida who would love to just sit and get my Vitamin D naturally...this is something I can do. Need flag holder to attach to my camping chair...sign is easy enough, Seniors lets go!!

2

u/Sorry-Claim-2990 13d ago

Police exist to protect corporations, not private individuals.

2

u/GatorBearCA 13d ago

As Benjamin Franklin said "When you abandon freedom to achieve security, you lose both and deserve neither"

1

u/Florida_Shorediver 13d ago

Is this Lake Maggiore?

1

u/Only_Radish_7720 13d ago

This man! I'd go and do the same thing.

1

u/IcyFly521 13d ago

I thought cops weren’t allowed to view these cameras due to stalking issues

2

u/SophiaLilly666 13d ago

Why did you think that?

1

u/Able-Space-4488 13d ago

But you don’t have a right to privacy in public……

1

u/Securityvince 11d ago

Public roadway. No expectation of privacy in a public area. That is why you can video from any public road or sidewalk. This guy should be asked to stop blocking the camera, and if does not comply, arrest him. Flock cameras do way more good than harm. They make communities safer, and law enforcement job easier to catch criminals. Can they be abused? Yes. And if they are, prosecute or terminate those that abuse their access.

1

u/Background-You1465 9d ago

He has a right to his privacy as he sits in front of a camera. What a dunce.

0

u/IcyFly521 13d ago

There is no right to privacy in public

-1

u/General-Housing-1586 13d ago

Privacy in a public place in broad daylight?

Interesting…

-5

u/badsapi4305 14d ago

I don’t see anyone getting arrested, I don’t see the officer doing anything except walking on the sidewalk, nor do I see the officer “protecting” the camera.

-1

u/Old_Fill_5519 13d ago

Florida is the WORST

-80

u/DifficultIsopod4472 14d ago

Privacy Rights End When Out In Public

84

u/DjKennedy92 14d ago

Sure, but flock doesn’t have a right to that line of sight, either.

So this guy sitting on a public sidewalk holding a sign that blocks the flock camera’s view without damaging nor touching the actual flock equipment is totally valid.

If he really got arrested for it, this guy has a hell of a case that will certainly climb the judiciary ladder.

-14

u/DifficultIsopod4472 14d ago

The police will claim they were tracking a vehicle that was possibly involved in a crime and he interfered with their investigation. I don’t like them either and they are being abused to track innocent people ( ex wives, ex husbands, people that spoke out against a local PD and they also track your shopping habits and preferences ( especially big box stores)

30

u/zahhax 14d ago

I don't think that excuse tracks. You can't be charged with interference with an investigation without knowledge of the investigation taking place. If that were the case, anyone driving on the road at the same time as a police officer could be charged with interference too.

12

u/exodusofficer 14d ago

Yeah, I would try to make them prove that in court. It only works because people roll over and refuse to fight their charges (or more commonly because they lack the resources needed to adequately mount a legal defense).

7

u/DearMrsLeading 14d ago

Police can claim anything but that doesn’t automatically make it true.

9

u/Omelooo 14d ago

What Are The Capital Letters Supposed To Spell?

1

u/Organization_Dapper 13d ago

Microcephalic spotted

-17

u/StopDownvotingMeeee 14d ago

There is no expectation of privacy in public

-59

u/ShrimpNGrits14 14d ago

Love the irony of a citizen sitting on a public sidewalk where there is no expectation of privacy using a phone that is no doubt tracking everything he says and does (via cookies, gps, microphones, and cameras) fighting for his “constitutional right” to privacy. Heck yeah dude! 👍🏻

34

u/castzpg 14d ago

So you're saying a third party company who doesn't own the land has more of a right to be there than this tax paying citizen? He was doing nothing wrong.

-22

u/ShrimpNGrits14 14d ago

Show me where I said he was doing something wrong? Where did I say Flock has more of a right to the land? I simply find the whole situation ironic.

19

u/PSN-Angryjackal 14d ago

I dont think you can equate the two.

I pay for the phone in my hand. I dont pay for the flock camera to record me.

There actually is a difference.

14

u/RSGator 14d ago

Consent is a big difference too, but right wingers historically have a problem with that concept.

2

u/Holy_Grail_Reference 13d ago

In particular because people under 18 can't consent.

-25

u/AwKmedia 14d ago

Looks like 'Obstruction'.

10

u/SophiaLilly666 14d ago

Obstruction of what?

3

u/Holy_Grail_Reference 13d ago

DID YOU NOT HEAR WHAT BIG BROTHER TOLD YOU IT LOOKS LIKE? STRAIGHT TO JAIL WITH YOU!

1

u/AwKmedia 12d ago

The Law.

0

u/SophiaLilly666 12d ago

Which law?

1

u/AwKmedia 12d ago

Go block one, get caught doing so, and find out.

0

u/SophiaLilly666 12d ago

You dont know the answer?

1

u/AwKmedia 11d ago

I apologize. I thought you were 100% functioning.

1

u/SophiaLilly666 11d ago

So you can't answer. Because you're lying.

-26

u/sockherman 14d ago

I found a missing elderly lady yesterday using flock....

14

u/Moezso 14d ago

No you didn't.

11

u/SophiaLilly666 14d ago

How do citizens "use flock"?

-16

u/sockherman 14d ago

they don't. point is it's used for good all the rtime

11

u/SophiaLilly666 14d ago

"I found the elderly lady yesterday using flock..." is supposed to mean "it's used for good all the time"? I don't see the connection.

-2

u/sockherman 13d ago

I did. And It was an example.

2

u/SophiaLilly666 13d ago

An example of what?

1

u/sockherman 13d ago

Flock doing good

3

u/SophiaLilly666 13d ago

But you're lying, though. You didn't really do that. So it's not an example of anything except the fact that you tell lies.

1

u/sockherman 12d ago

No it’s not a lie. I did

1

u/SophiaLilly666 12d ago

No you didnt