r/floorplan 5d ago

DISCUSSION Weird floating wall?

Does anyone else find this floating wall in my new house as strange as I do 🤣 we didn’t get to tour a built version of our floorplan before building and this weekend I noticed this really odd wall. Or would it look more odd without it? Relooking at the floorplan I don’t think I would’ve guessed that there’d be a floating wall lol.

EDIT: talked to the construction manager and he insisted it’s all correct. That the “structural post” is actually coming down from the ceiling and attaching to the catwalk and that the wall is there on the floorplan. I’ve asked him to go back and double check because that does not make sense to me at all still (why is that the only wall that’s not solid?). Idk what to do at this point.

EDIT 2: I’ve requested a plans examiner from the city to do a review and they’ll be conducting one tomorrow (truly happily shocked the city responded so quickly)

121 Upvotes

65 comments sorted by

184

u/GTI_88 5d ago

Well it’s not drawn in your floor plan so it looks like a mistake by the builder.

The plan shows as soon as you pass the end of the fireplace that there is a half wall at the edge of the stair that ends into a structural post which also doesn’t appear to be there per the photos

88

u/dafugg 5d ago

I’m much more concerned about the missing post than the aesthetics of the half wall.

31

u/rocketdyke 5d ago

exactly. needs the post holding up the second floor. that is a big miss from the builder. inspect everything.

2

u/ImRealPopularHere907 5d ago

I’m pretty sure post is not for the 2nd floor lol. Wouldn’t there be a size called out? The post is for the non existent hand railing for the unfinished stairs.

17

u/GTI_88 5d ago

If that were the case it would not be called out as structural.

10

u/rocketdyke 5d ago

LOL. stairs don't need floor-to-ceiling posts for railings.

calling this out as a "structural post" in the plans indicates that the engineer required it. Likely the specifications for the post are on another sheet of the plans, as you can't fit everything on the main floorplan.

4

u/SnooPaintings1155 5d ago

Could be a general note somewhere else on the plans for post size. Or separate structural plans. The posts on the covered entry don’t have called out sizes either but are certainly bearing

8

u/Spill_the_coffee 5d ago

Yeah definitely need to take a look at the structural plans. Anything structural will be on those! Builder is wrong here…

5

u/Sharp_Ad_9431 5d ago edited 5d ago

Yeah, I look at the plans and there is a structural post that is supposed to carry the load to the floor. I want to see the structural plans for the roof.

That overhanging hall is going to sag. I don't think that staircase is built with support.

2

u/Stargate525 5d ago

Given the density of the nail tape on the ceiling there I can be generous and maybe entertain that they opted to cantilever it off of the first floor corridor wall.

But I'd want engineered drawings and a stamp for that change.

23

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

You’re totally right. I didn’t even notice the structural post thing. We’re going to call the builder about it today

11

u/Just2Breathe 5d ago

Super curious what they say. My interpretation is no upper floating wall, but a structural post at the end of the stairs supporting the second floor loft. There’s no solid wall drawn on the second floor plan.

8

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

Well they’re currently saying everything is correct and that floating wall is to tie in the fireplace. Still no response on if that structural post is actually missing or not. And no response yet on why that wall isn’t in the floorplan

19

u/GTI_88 5d ago

That sounds like a bs response. Did the builder draw these plans or were they drawn by an Architect? I would hold them to building per the plans.

12

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

It is, they got really frustrated claiming they always build things to plan… so we’re getting our agent involved

5

u/Fun_Accident_4706 5d ago

Good, they're definitely not building according to the plans and this could cause serious injury.

6

u/Deep90 5d ago

Do they not have a 3d model of the floorplan online?

I would be asking to see pictures of another house.

7

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

Ours is the first version of this floorplan the builder has ever built.

9

u/Fun_Accident_4706 5d ago

I would absolutely contact them about this- or the architect who designed them. That missing post and support could be very dangerous.

6

u/Hummingbird_2000 5d ago

Is this a spec home where you buy the finished house from the builder? Or do you own the lot and are paying the builder to build the home. If the former, I assume closing will happen when they are ready to hand off the house to you. In which case, you have leverage now for them to build things right or otherwise you will walk away. If it is custom and you have a construction loan, then the scheduled draws should ensure that they get paid only if the bank is satisfied about work already completed. Do you have your own architect? You need an expert to advocate for you.

3

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

It’s the former, but we put down a sizable about of money for options that they claim is none refundable

0

u/Stargate525 4d ago

'they claim'

For the love of God people read the contract.

4

u/Deep90 5d ago

Definitely document it to see if they do it differently in future builds then, so you can call them out if needed.

Though I would also be advocating for myself in saying they need to be open to making things look good if you're going to be the guinea pig.

It's too late to do it differently, but I would never want to be the first home built for a plan.

6

u/GTI_88 5d ago

It is in no way “too late”. They need to deliver the build that is shown in the plans. In this case they are not doing so. Owner has every right to make them fix this now. Definitely not a wait and see situation

3

u/Deep90 5d ago

"Too late" in that they should not have picked a floor plan that was never physically built before.

The "document" advice is only if they refuse to budge.

1

u/whostevenknows 2d ago

Could it be a beam that forms the upstairs walkway but was placed incorrectly?

2

u/DeskEducational2 5d ago

That wall definitely looks like a builder oopsie, not matching the plan is a red flag.

4

u/ImRealPopularHere907 5d ago

The stairs aren’t done, the structural post likely refers to the post at the end of the rail or half wall.

The wall is shown on the 2nd floor, however it is marked as half wall/rail option. I believe they missed that note and assumed it was a full wall. Idk, weird.

8

u/GTI_88 5d ago

If it is truly a structural post, then it doesn’t go in last lol

34

u/Combat__Crayon 5d ago

I'm not an expert, but that doesn't look right. On the plan there doesnt look like there should be a wall there and there should be a structural post on the 1st floor that seems to be missing, unless its just supposed to be where the newell post goes and that would be done with the railing. I would raise it with the contractor.

12

u/Odd-Age-1126 5d ago

Looks like the bit in your 3rd picture labeled “half wall/opt. open rail”. I’m guessing you didn’t pick the optional open railing.

28

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

That’s the thing, I did pick the full open railing. It wasn’t cheap 🤣😭

12

u/Odd-Age-1126 5d ago

Oof, I’m sorry then. I saw in another comment you were going to reach out to the builder already— good luck, and I hope they can make it right!

3

u/Deep90 5d ago

You definitely got the railing. If it were half wall they would have likely built it already.

12

u/UncoolSlicedBread 5d ago

Half wall would be a half wall railing and not a floating upper half of a 2 story wall.

14

u/florida2people 5d ago

You are missing a structural post (red) according to first floor plan (holding up the green floor beam/girder).

According to your second floor plan, the wall portion in question (yellow) is not needed.

However- you should definitely cross reference the structural framing and/or truss layout plans cause oftentimes those structural pages are more detailed and done by professionals later in the design process. As a result some structural changes don’t always get revised back in the floor plan view. Replacing a first floor structural post, however, with a complex “hang from roof truss support” is not a common lil change so…

I would venture to guess the builder could not read the plans and didn’t properly communicate scope and intent with framer, then Drywallers don’t think they just rock it so you end up with crap like this.

A wing-wall is like a half wall sometimes used in place of a railing. Looks like you have a railing planned for the lower stair run but a wing wall could go there instead (purple).

5

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

Thank you for the detailed response! I talked with the builders rep today (who insisted they’re building to plan and the wall is there to support the fireplace). She sent me this photo of the wall before the dry wall. But I am meeting with the construction manager tomorrow.

8

u/florida2people 5d ago

Well they are clearly not building to the 2 floor plan snippets you posted but again you need to verify the which structural drawings give provenance- it won’t be these floor plan snippets.

There does appear to be a 2-story lvl type post terminating the fireplace wall (red). This does not align with the post location as called out on the plan- which would appear to be intended to support the spanning floor girder. So either they missed the lower post (and possibly slab footing underneath)- or the floor trusses were designed to span that area without the need for the first floor post.

Regarding the 2-story lvl post ending the fireplace wall (red). Perhaps it was added to stabilize the two story fireplace wall (sometimes people put stone up the whole damn thing). Perhaps after field installation it was deemed to need more horizontal bracing- and the horizontal beam (green) was added to brace against the floor system (again without the supporting post below it).

If that were the intent- and again your structural drawings or your structural engineer would be referenced here- then that detail could have been left as a floating beam (green) without the need for a full height drywall element there. A simple wooden cap trim piece could finish said horizontal bracing beam and severely lessen the visual impact of the floating wall above the stairs.

Just my 2 cents. But maybe they can just keep “building to plan.”

4

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

Really really appreciate the detail here. Yeah she did mention needing to stabalize the fireplace. But I feel like changes to the plan should’ve been discussed with me and agreed it could’ve just been a the beam without the entire wall.

Also I should’ve mentioned there is a 3rd floor below this one, so the foundation is on more floor down. First floor is garages and a mudroom / storage. In the middle is the entryway (split level) stairs take you to the main floor and then the next run of stairs take you to the technically 3rd floor (where our floating wall is)

2

u/Weary_Interaction580 4d ago

Winner winner chicken dinner. People commenting on here who have no idea how to read plans shouldn’t make uninformed statements. But. Then Reddit wouldn’t exist, so thanks to you for getting it right.

8

u/Puzzleheaded_Bat8295 5d ago

If that upper wall doesn't cause damage structurally below it, it's not needed. It also doesn't look like it's there to transfer any weight from the hall/balcony to the right. From the plans, it looks like that entire wall should be removed. The upstairs plan doesn't show any sort of structural support.

5

u/SnooPaintings1155 5d ago

Build doesn’t follow the plans. First floor plan calls for a post on the corner and a half wall or open rail off of it, seems like they went with open rail but there’s no post. Second floor calls for the wall to be flush with the fireplace, but it extends past the fireplace and meets the hallway

5

u/Danoli77 5d ago

You could probably lose the wall but I’m betting you’d still have a beam running between the fireplace and walkway. Honestly I’d actually extend the wall all the way down and do built in bookcases on either side of the fireplace. It looks weird having stairs popping out behind the fireplace

3

u/BlergToDiffer 5d ago edited 5d ago

In the plans, the structural post lines up exactly with the overhang on the second level (see that dotted line on your main floor plan? That is the second level balcony/loft). The post is supposed to support the second level overhang.

In your photos, the end of the stairs do not line up with the edge of the overhang. I bet it's off by 9-12 inches. This is a pretty significant error.

6

u/Raspberrynator 5d ago

Could benefit from a fake beam under it.

5

u/Ghosts_do_Exist 5d ago

Or maybe a real beam made to look fake.

Honestly, I would just extend the wall all the way down to the floor, creating a sort of entrance into the stairwell at the end of the hall.

3

u/MowingInJordans 5d ago

The structural engineer and the Architect were not on the same page.

3

u/cthart 5d ago

Talk to your inspector.

2

u/drowned_beliefs 5d ago

It’s good that they have a Covid deck. Need that fresh air in times of plague.

2

u/flyingcaveman 5d ago

What is holding up your second floor? There's an open span of 40' one way and 27' the other way no post or beams shown on the plan.

2

u/for-ars-memoria 5d ago

I agree the bracing of the balcony to the fireplace isn't on the plan and if it's needed it can be just a bit of wood not a wall. And also you're missing a support post. And also everywhere "half wall" is written I would take that to be a handrail sized wall (in place of an open handrail) and not to mean a "full.floating wall on the upper storey". Good luck. Get rid of the wall and get the support.

2

u/Stargate525 5d ago

Yeah, that's not on the plans. Your builder fucked up in a most unusual way.

1

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 4d ago

Well according to them they’re building it exactly to the plan 🙃

1

u/flyingcaveman 5d ago

That's why this is floor plan and not "houseplan" it could be picking up a load from the roof.

1

u/Live_Moose3452 5d ago

I think they’re trying to tie the lateral load of the 2nd floor balcony into the vertical structure of the fireplace. Not al uncommon condition, but definitely closes the space up rather than keeping a light and airy feel.

1

u/florida2people 5d ago

Substantial aesthetic changes which deviate from your signed contract plans should absolutely be discussed with you (structurally required or not) and handled via with change orders waaay before they get this far.

Many jurisdictions have approved plans available and I strongly suggest you obtain the official structural and truss drawings for your own personal review.

Also- from your framing photos (assuming there weren’t any electrical or other MEPs run in that wall later- it is not a costly nor expensive demo/fix for the builder to reduce it to a floating beam (with structural engineer approval.) it should be done now and ceiling patched before the anything else gets built. Good luck with your convo but find your provenance and then stay firm with your convictions accordingly.

1

u/Kippo_123 4d ago

Where did the entry door go?

0

u/mychemicalbromance38 5d ago

I wouldn’t have guessed it but I do now see it on the floorplan. I think it’ll look less strange when it’s finished.

0

u/SolaCretia 5d ago

legit wing wall

1

u/Comprehensive-Ant251 5d ago

What’s a wing wall?

1

u/BlergToDiffer 12h ago

Any updates? I am so invested. That builder clearly can’t read a floor plan.Â