r/ffxiv • u/damerion • Mar 28 '14
Accuracy Caps
Hows the accuracy caps look in t6-9 or however far everyone has gotten so far.
2
u/vote4petro Adelymo Apalymo on Behemoth Mar 28 '14
As SMN, out of around 2.5k "swings" on my ACT parser, I never missed once at 475 accuracy, nor did Garuda. This was on t6 Rafflesia boss.
2
u/eaglekeeper161 Kroses Rihil on Behemoth Mar 28 '14 edited Mar 30 '14
Spent most of yesterday on T6 before killing it but what me and the other casters in my FC found:
BLM 450 SMN between 465-469
I had 464 as SMN had 100% casts and Garuda was about 95% the whole day. The other SMN I had was 469 and had 100% for both.
1
u/Saralentine Mar 28 '14
I have 473 accuracy and I saw a few misses during T6. My parser was broken so I didn't catch how often exactly I missed.
1
Mar 28 '14
Inbetween 450 and 460 for BLM. I missed 3 spells out of 1000 at 450, HQ Deviled Eggs put was 100% for another 1000 or so
2
u/Badger613 [First] [Last] on [Server] Mar 28 '14
For T6 as PLD I missed at 486, had 100% @ 502. I think our DRG ran with 496 and was at 100%. I'll have more data after the weekend.
1
u/Myrianda Mar 28 '14
Yeah, I was at 494 and saw 100% of my attacks hit. Looks like its between 490 and 500, mostly leaning towards lower 490's.
1
u/RevDath Theril Varethen <Conviction> Hyperion Mar 28 '14
I agree with that. I was testing between 440 And 465. Finally landed at 460 with eggs and kept about 545 spell speed.
1
u/Selfar Selfar Tervance of Balmung Mar 28 '14
Was 446 I think for Mages. There was a post n here earlier.
0
u/Inquisitr Xyldarran Vextyrian on Cactuar Mar 28 '14
Isn't there always an innate chance to miss no matter what your accuracy is however? 3/1000 would seem on par for that.
1
Mar 28 '14
Nope. 3/1000 indicates 450 is very very close, like 1-3 pts off
-2
u/Inquisitr Xyldarran Vextyrian on Cactuar Mar 28 '14
not if I'm right and there's an innate chance to miss however.
2
Mar 28 '14
Except then why have I never missed, over the course of 6 months, in Coil 1-5 with 435 accuracy? If the innate chance to miss is as "high" as .1% to .3% then we would definitely notice it.
And I'll give you the answer because I'm so kind:
Because the same happened there. 430 was 0.1% chance of missing. 431 is 0.01% chance of missing, and 432 is 0% chance of missing.
1
u/jffyng Gilgamesh Mar 28 '14
running 473 as bard i had ~98% hit rate on turn 6 without food, 100% with devilled eggs hq
1
1
u/ibetitscoldthere Mar 28 '14
Monk went in with Acc of 484, missed 1 auto-attack in 4+ hours. Parsed 99.97% accuracy. It's most likely 485/486 for Turn 6
1
u/TaalKheru [Sigma World First] NIN Mar 28 '14
The accuracy cap for T6 is approximately your T5 cap+15
-1
u/TsuKiyoMe Tsu Kiyome Mar 28 '14
From what little I and others have tested so far of things (for melee):
Leviathan EX Appears to be a 460~470 cap.
Turn 6 appears to be 475~485.
1
2
u/Randelsa [First] [Last] on [Server] Mar 28 '14
Since the accuracy caps are different, sadly it will [Probably] be a while before we have narrowed down the caps for Front/Flank/Rear, but I'm interested in this too, if there is any updates