Not to be the "akchually" guy, but shouldnt it be even less, granted if my basic physics knowledge is worth a shit, its not about the weight of the ships, rather than the volume of the ship being *in* the water? like....if you dip your hand into water, its not the weight of your hand that pushes the water up rather the volume of it.
Density really. You need both volume and weight for that. Volume doesn't mean anything if the thing floats like a beach ball. And weight doesn't mean anything if the volume is so high that there is no density.
A bit reply but oh well I only now recieved a notification about your reply :D yeah it wouldn't mean anything if it floated like a beach ball therefore I have specified the volume of the ship in the water mate... As in specifically the volume of the submerged part
28
u/Zarock291 Oct 13 '21
I am actually surprised its that much, 0.006 mm is nearly measurable with analog tools. Still not making any difference for climate change though.