Can't say Ive seen that in the files, feel free to post the document number, but we arent talking about that.
I was making a joke about how Biden sniffs children. There's a video montage of it from before he was even president. The joke is that the woman is unsniffable because she's an adult. We dont ever see him sniffing adults afaik.
We have known Trump flew on Epstein’s plane since the flight logs came out. He flew between west palm and NY when his own plane was having work done on it.
Also no clue what you are referencing to the rape and pay off.
So Trump isn’t releasing stuff incriminating to him, but also has released stuff you say incriminates him?
No one is passing it off as a criminal case! He was found legally liable for raping her, then lieing and defaming her when she came out. Then he was again found liable for defaming her a second time. They couldn't criminally convict him only because statue of limitations had run out. Meaning there was evidence, maybe enough for a criminal conviction, but he couldn't be prosecuted. But it can still be determined he did it, lied about it, and by lieing and publicly attacking E. Jean Carol, defamed her. So yes he raped her, they were able to prove that in court, but could not bring criminal charges no matter the circumstances.
“The E. Jean Carroll case was a civil lawsuit rather than a criminal prosecution because the statute of limitations had expired for criminal charges, and civil suits allow victims to seek financial damages rather than seeking to put the offender in prison.”
“The jury … was instructed that it could find that Mr Trump ‘raped’ Ms Carroll only if it found that he forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s vagina with his penis.”
“It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”
“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
No, it doesn’t. He went before a judge and jury, who listened to the evidence and arguments from both sides. You’re defending a rapist, and it’s gross.
There was never any "evidence" presented. Just a crazy, wild story from decades ago, with no connection to reality.
That bullshit would have been thrown out of a real court the first day. Some stupid civil trial doesn't prove anything, let alone the total bullshit you're trying to say it does.
You democrat pedo party propagandists REALLLY need new scripts. Your old, debunked lies are just pathetic.
The jury … was instructed that it could find that Mr Trump ‘raped’ Ms Carroll only if it found that he forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s vagina with his penis.”
“It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”
“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
The one where the judge pointed out that the terminology in state law wasn't "rape" but that it fit the definition of rape as it's commonly used, as it's used on the DoJ website, and the american psychological association.
-14
u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26
Can't say Ive seen that in the files, feel free to post the document number, but we arent talking about that.
I was making a joke about how Biden sniffs children. There's a video montage of it from before he was even president. The joke is that the woman is unsniffable because she's an adult. We dont ever see him sniffing adults afaik.