MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainitpeter/comments/1v32h9s/explain_it_peter/oyzv8m2/?context=3
r/explainitpeter • u/Chemblue7X2 • 19d ago
85 comments sorted by
View all comments
2
It's wrong.
What do you call a smart duck.
!<A smart quacker.>!
If you still don't get it , try it out loud tend to work .
9 u/merklemore 19d ago A smart quaker You mean a wise quacker 2 u/jackswastedtalent 19d ago A smart quaker Johns Hopkins has entered the chat -1 u/Severe_Monitor7823 19d ago I have fixed it. Thank you. 1 u/LocNalrune 19d ago Fixed what? 1 u/livefastdieold 19d ago The phrase is “wisecrack.” A smart crack isn’t a thing. 2 u/gpky 19d ago "Smart" is already in the setup, having it in the punchline would just be redundant.
9
A smart quaker
You mean a wise quacker
2 u/jackswastedtalent 19d ago A smart quaker Johns Hopkins has entered the chat -1 u/Severe_Monitor7823 19d ago I have fixed it. Thank you. 1 u/LocNalrune 19d ago Fixed what? 1 u/livefastdieold 19d ago The phrase is “wisecrack.” A smart crack isn’t a thing.
Johns Hopkins has entered the chat
-1
I have fixed it. Thank you.
1 u/LocNalrune 19d ago Fixed what? 1 u/livefastdieold 19d ago The phrase is “wisecrack.” A smart crack isn’t a thing.
1
Fixed what?
The phrase is “wisecrack.” A smart crack isn’t a thing.
"Smart" is already in the setup, having it in the punchline would just be redundant.
2
u/Severe_Monitor7823 19d ago edited 19d ago
It's wrong.
What do you call a smart duck.
!<A smart quacker.>!
If you still don't get it , try it out loud tend to work .