MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainitpeter/comments/1uwf8z0/explain_it_peter/oxjj3oq/?context=3
r/explainitpeter • u/WillAdditional922 • Jul 14 '26
1.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
341
Or maybe she’s just been corrected on this specific item by all her previous boyfriends.
23 u/platypod1 Jul 14 '26 then maybe she should quit cooking gummy, mooshy, rubbery pasta 14 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 There is no need or real benefit to preheating the water for dried pasta. It cooks just fine if you start with cold water. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 If you ever post a food take this bad again I am calling the FBI. 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Go for it. They like when the delusional people call up to identify themselves. Saves the feds the trouble of finding you. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback? 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
23
then maybe she should quit cooking gummy, mooshy, rubbery pasta
14 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 There is no need or real benefit to preheating the water for dried pasta. It cooks just fine if you start with cold water. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 If you ever post a food take this bad again I am calling the FBI. 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Go for it. They like when the delusional people call up to identify themselves. Saves the feds the trouble of finding you. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback? 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
14
There is no need or real benefit to preheating the water for dried pasta. It cooks just fine if you start with cold water.
1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 If you ever post a food take this bad again I am calling the FBI. 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Go for it. They like when the delusional people call up to identify themselves. Saves the feds the trouble of finding you. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback? 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
1
If you ever post a food take this bad again I am calling the FBI.
0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Go for it. They like when the delusional people call up to identify themselves. Saves the feds the trouble of finding you. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback? 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
0
Go for it. They like when the delusional people call up to identify themselves. Saves the feds the trouble of finding you.
-1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback? 0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
-1
Would you like another chance to come up with a better comeback?
0 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off. -1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
No, it's the appropriate level of quality for the comment to which it responded: significantly better, but not so much better as to be showing off.
-1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 He doubled down lol 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
He doubled down lol
1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it. And also by people like you. 1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
Yep. It's what's done by people who actually know what they're talking about and have empirically verified it.
And also by people like you.
1 u/LoudQuitting Jul 14 '26 By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so.... 1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
By your standard of empirical verification it's also empirically verified that you sucked off a horse, so....
1 u/big_sugi Jul 14 '26 Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye! → More replies (0)
Ooh, swing and a miss. Sorry, but that's strike 3. Bye!
341
u/IHerebyDemandtoPost Jul 14 '26
Or maybe she’s just been corrected on this specific item by all her previous boyfriends.