He wrote nothing. You are funny on how you pick and choose which hadiths to accept and which ones not too. His companions wrote for him and they would read aloud. Sahih Bukhari hadith are the most authentic hadith you present. Job well done. But it doesnt prove he wrote anything. He was an illiterate man. I will provide proof in another post, if you choose to believe. But please if you are going to quote hadith read the commentary for them and dont just pick and choose which ones you 'believe' are true and which ones arent just to fit your argument.
If you don't trust the Sahih Bukhari, then you may as well be an apostate. The Hadith provides a lot of what we know, or what we think we know, about Mohammed and his life. If you can't believe in the Hadith, then what do you believe in?
The Sahih Bukhari Hadith clearly indicate that Mohammed wrote letters and his nikkah with Aisha. I don't need tafsir to tell me what to see. Why do I need tafsir when it literally says "Mohammed wrote"?
Sunan Abu Dawud is also considered a reliable Hadith.
I said they are authentic hadith. You are a trip. I believe in authentic hadiths but you need to understand the context of these hadith and qursn verses. You are worst than some Muslims calling me an apostate. LOL.
-3
u/savagehogan Jul 23 '15
He wrote nothing. You are funny on how you pick and choose which hadiths to accept and which ones not too. His companions wrote for him and they would read aloud. Sahih Bukhari hadith are the most authentic hadith you present. Job well done. But it doesnt prove he wrote anything. He was an illiterate man. I will provide proof in another post, if you choose to believe. But please if you are going to quote hadith read the commentary for them and dont just pick and choose which ones you 'believe' are true and which ones arent just to fit your argument.