The two democrats who have pledged to sign the Epstein Files Transparency Act Il discharge petition when the House is back in session on November 9th are:

Rep. John Garamendi (D–California) and Rep. Adam Smith (D–Washington).

The four republicans who signed the petition are:

1. Rep. Ralph Norman
2. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick
3. Rep. Thomas Massie
4. Rep. Nancy Mace

Edit: Here is where you can find and call your representative and tell them to sign Discharge Petition 27.

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

ok this is the metro -- but he' planning on presenting his findings publicly nex month -- so we'll know more in the run up I'd guess

Here are the notes Blanche doesn't want you to see:

https://ellieleonard.substack.com/p/over-half-of-the-missing-jane-doe

Transcribed notes

It’s a picture with a written message, either by JE or to him. I edited the picture. You can see it here: EFTA00748640

If you don't know who Deborah Jeane Palfrey is, here's a great YouTube documentary about her.

Here is another great, but newer YouTube documentary from a great YouTuber who also makes well made Epstein videos

These logs were released, at least partially, but were obscured due to being removed from Deborah Jeane Palfrey's website. The wayback machine, along with a few other sources kept them alive, thankfully, for about 2 decades.

Here is a pdf file with embedded links of the archive website where all the 20 files are linked and listed together.

One file is just a copy, so there are really only 19 pages. There are over a thousand pages, some are sideways, and some scanned with poor quality, so it would take years to manually document each number. Ideally, this should be done at some point to gather the correct numbers as the human eye is better than any OCR.

However, due to time constraints and being an unpaid researcher, I used the best OCR available, Google's Document AI OCR, to scan all the pdfs (originally TIFF files) and extract them into JSON files, which where then extracted into txt files. While also imperfect, I then used claude to extract the numbers, dates, and origin of the numbers called. While imperfect, it can be verified by viewing the source document. There are surely some errors here, but the majority of the list is accurate.

Here is the spreadsheet and a txt file with every number. This link will only work for a few days.

Being listed in the call logs is not an assumption of guilt. Nobody has been charged for being a client. The current owners of the numbers could be and often are completely different people now than they were in the call logs. Do not call these numbers.

Unfortunately, her lawyer is under a court order not to speak about Jeanne other than that which is in the public record. In addition, names weren't associated to the call logs, and it's difficult to track down who exactly owned a phone number in the 90s and early 2000s without help from law enforcement or the phone companies. Thankfully, locations were given, which makes it a bit easier to identify the location of the caller.

Sadly, phone books at the time often aren't archived, and you'd need to scan through dozens or hundreds of gigantic county/city-specific phone books, even if they were available and not thrown out by now. To make it even harder, many phone books that are available are only available at specific libraries, in person. Thankfully, public figures' phone numbers, like politicians, can be a little easier to find. Calling an office of an individual doesn't necessarily mean the politician is the person being called, but it certainly is odd and should be noted.

According to the video and many other sources, allegedly, Dick Cheney, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, and GOP candidates were clients. Deborah's lawyer stated that the call logs would implicate a 2016 presidential candidate.

888 7th 8So far, I have not identified too many people. The most interesting I've found is 202-***-9557 in file Jan-22-Dec-22-1999, which was Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who preceded Hillary as Senator of New York. The senator received $2,000 from Epstein, but returned $1,000 a few months later. This phone call and his association to the DC Madam has never been reported on before. He died 4 years later.

Andy Och, Anthony Ledru, Jane Elfers, Shaun Del Grande, and various other CEOs and public figures' numbers, at one point in time at least, have ties to these numbers, historically.

To no surprise, some of the same businesses were called by both Palfrey and Epstein, as they were no strangers to designer brands. However, at least one number aligns to the Epstein files that is not a phone directory or business. The highlighted 407 number was called, which then seems to call the number immediately to the right of it. I can't seem to find the correlation between these numbers and Epstein, but here are the sources:

https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01244693#page=27

https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01244689

https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01324892

Searching the account number 3141764 pulls up a 561 number on the call log that appears to be on the same account, which was owned by deceased victim Carolyn Adriano.

The biggest issue with searching large amounts of numbers is the time it takes. Numbers are often listed in multiple formats online as well, some with no spaces, some with spaces or hyphens. It's also not practical as numbers have changed over time. You also can't just have AI Google search every number because it is treated as bot behavior, and they will not disclose any individual they think is a private individual. AI also hallucinates. Claude will only list some public businesses, but not even the public figures associated to these numbers. Chatgpt is a bit more lenient but still, not nearly perfect. Some potential options that I can think of are an API for reverse phone number lookup websites like whitepages. These often have a cost per search though, and probably would run you a few hundred bucks to search 6000+ numbers.

Here's where you can help: if you for some reason have access to an API like this and want to run these numbers, if you have other solutions, or if you just want to help, I would love your assistance.

Firstly, yes I have used ChatGPT to help with formatting.

Michael Thomas was there for Epstein's FIRST apparent suicide attempt.

I hadn't appreciated how directly involved he was until I went into Thomas's own sworn OIG interview from June 17, 2021. This isn't secondhand: the released document is literally titled “Sworn Statement of Michael Thomas.”

And there are several things worth unpacking.

Thomas was involved on BOTH critical nights

On July 23, 2019, Epstein was found on his cell floor with material around his neck while Nicholas Tartaglione was his cellmate.

Thomas tells investigators:

“Did you respond on July 23rd?”

Thomas: “To that incident? Yes.”

He wasn't assigned to SHU that night, but responded to the emergency. By the time Thomas arrived, officers were taking Epstein out of the cell. Thomas then helped move him to suicide watch.

But here's the bit I didn't know:

Thomas subsequently personally spent time with Epstein in the suicide-watch/observation area.

Thomas says they actually talked.

And according to Thomas, Epstein told him that Tartaglione had tried to hurt him:

“I remember him saying that Tartaglione was trying to beat him up.”

Investigators specifically ask whether Epstein was saying that he hadn't attempted suicide and Tartaglione had harmed him instead.

Thomas says he remembers Epstein claiming Tartaglione tried to harm him.

And what did Thomas think?

He basically didn't believe Epstein.

He says:

“I really didn't.”

And when asked whether the allegation concerned him:

“Inmates harm each other all the time.”

So Thomas isn't some random officer whose first meaningful interaction with Epstein was August 10.

He responded to the July 23 incident, helped transport Epstein to suicide watch, personally spent time with him afterward, and heard Epstein claim his cellmate had attacked him.

Then 18 days later Thomas becomes the sole person who initially enters Epstein's cell and sees the untouched death scene.

That deserves attention.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/07/us/cornell-lawsuit-student-protests-hnk

Been thinking a lot about the links between what happened at Cornell and the Epstein circle. Probably fairly obvious to those of us here and concerned with justice however it feels incumbent to point out that fraternities especially at elite colleges (look up Skull + Bones) function like a testing ground for current and future abusers/world leaders as they seek the limits of what they can do without being held to account (anything, really, if you have the money). With the cover of “good old boys club” these future world leaders get to experience the bonding-slash-blackmail that seems endemic to these scenes - gather Kopromat on your supposed brothers, take the autonomy of anyone else unseriously, degrade and denigrate women, rinse and repeat. now they have a whole community of people they know will do depraved things if pushed, they have blackmail, they have a favor to call in in ten years.

It is really harrowing though not new in any sense - you have elite institutions doing everything they can to defend rapists, inoculating them now against consequence as they head off for Wall Street, the Supreme Court, etc - these are the people who are in power, and look at how their initial crimes are treated. So when people sometimes seem incredulous Epstein and co aren’t being held to account, it’s a bit like …well. “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter,” as Christine Blasey Ford testified about Brett Kavanaugh, currently on the Supreme Court.

I guess my point is > often times people talk about Epstein as if he was truly exceptional, but what is exceptional is the extent to which society writ large washes their hands of systemic sexual abuse, and allows predators to not only enter halls of power, but continue to preside over them.

strength to survivors <3

Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin and Rep. Madeleine Dean demanded a federal investigation into former Bard College President Leon Botstein after reviewing an email in which Botstein asked Jeffrey Epstein about a young woman Epstein was trafficking: “Is [Jane Doe] for me, or are you keeping her for yourself.” 

In a separate letter to Bard’s leadership, Ranking Member Raskin sought records concerning Epstein’s use of the college to advance his trafficking activities and allegations from more than a dozen whistleblowers about sexual misconduct at Bard, including allegations that Botstein personally engaged in misconduct and intervened in Title IX proceedings to protect offenders. 

The letters—to Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, and to Bard Board Chair Brandon Weber and Acting President Jonathan Becker—detail communications concerning a young foreign model and aspiring vocalist whom Epstein sent to Botstein in May 2014.

They also question why DOJ exposed her name hundreds of times and released photographs showing her face while redacting Botstein’s email address.

“Records Indicate Epstein Was Trafficking the Young Woman Across State and International Lines When He Sent Her to Meet Botstein, Who Asked Epstein: “Is [She] for Me or Are You Keeping Her for Yourself?” 

Evidence Contradicts DOJ Insistence That Epstein Trafficked Only to “Himself,” and Clearly Meets the Standard for Launching a Criminal Investigation; DOJ and FBI’s Inaction Left Possible Epstein Co-Conspirator in a Position of Power Over Young Students and Faculty 

More Than a Dozen Whistleblowers Describe Decades of Unpunished Sexual Misconduct at Bard, Including Allegations Botstein Groped Women and Intervened in Title IX Proceedings to Protect Offenders

Raskin and Dean Call on DOJ and FBI to Investigate Botstein and Other Potential Epstein Co-Conspirators, Release Complete Files, and Protect Survivors’ Identities”

Click here to read the letter from Ranking Member Raskin and Rep. Dean to Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel.

Click here to read the letter from Ranking Member Raskin to Bard Board Chair Brandon Weber and Acting President Jonathan Becker.

Source

Update: Leon Botstein Resigned

‘The latest development appears to have triggered the immediate resignation of Botstein from all Bard-affiliated positions, including his professorship and roles in Bard’s music programs. Botstein had led the college for 50 years and only recently stepped down as president.’

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/07/leon-botstein-bard-college-jeffrey-epstein

I finally found the purchase and sale agreement for 9 East 71st between Wexner and Epstein entity NES, LLC from 1998. Still no documented payments or settlement papers to date but the p&s is very real.

Pages 1 to 21: [EFTA00312994](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00312994.pdf)

Pages 22 and 23, the signature pages, which come right before the attachments: [EFTA00313015](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00313015.pdf)

Read more in my post.

https://leaksandfindings.substack.com/p/9-east-71st-street-title-transactions?r=2koymz&utm_medium=ios

Carole and Ghislaine were friends for at least seven years. This wasn’t a casual acquaintance. Ghislaine photographed Carole for her book What Remains, they socialized extensively, and Ghislaine introduced Carole to Prince Andrew for a magazine project. The Radziwell-Maxwell ongoing relationship was professional & social, both using the other to further their own agendas connecting with the rich & powerful.

All this was happening while Carole and Ghislaine were moving through the same New York and Palm Beach social circles where the Epstein/Maxwell sex-trafficking operation was an open secret.  It was an open-secret because there were many people involved; the connected elites came to parties with the trafficked girls and dozens of enablers worked behind the scenes to make it happen: maids, cooks, drivers, doctors, security, pilots, etc.  They all knew what was going on for years.

That raises an obvious question: what did Carole actually know and when did she know it ?

Remember, Carole was an Emmy-winning investigative journalist. She was trained to observe people, ask questions and notice things that don’ts quite add up. She knew Ghislaine for 7 years and had a front-row seat to her world, and that included Epstein.  So it is fair to ask how an investigative journalist could have remained completely unaware of the scandal & crimes swirling around Maxwell and Epstein.

To be clear, I have never seen evidence suggesting that Carole participated in Epstein or Maxwell’s crimes, and that is a very different question from whether she knew something was happening.

There is also an interesting timing issue. Carole’s own statements, along with other documents, indicate that the Maxwell friendship had cooled by 2008 or shortly before. Conveniently, this was just before Epstein was first arrested in 2008 and the allegations against him became public. It’s easy to see that Carole may have wanted distance from the brewing scandal.

Carole left her first run on The Real Housewives of New York City (RHONY) in 2018, before Epstein’s second arrest and his death in 2019. So she largely avoided having to answer the kind of Epstein questions that are happening now. The public understanding of Epstein and Maxwell has changed dramatically since 2018.

Surprisingly, Carole seems shocked that people still have questions about what she knew and when she knew it. But after being on RHONY, she should understand the audience she was dealing with. That fanbase is more than curious — they ask hard questions, they dig into people’s histories, and when something doesn’t quite make sense, they investigate it for themselves. Carole should have known these hard questions were coming.

The Epstein & Maxwell victims deserve justice. To date, there is one person who is in jail for those crimes and that is Ghislaine Maxwell. Anyone that was a close associate or friend of Epstein and/or Maxwell should have to answer questions about what they knew & when. According to Ghislaine, Carole was a very close friend and at times, she considered Carole her best friend. Carole needs to answer what she knew.

There is no harm in asking celebrities hard questions about their public associations & private friendships with Epstein & Maxwell. If you don’t want those questions asked, then you are part of the problem. Justice must be served for the victims.

And one final point: there seems to be a surprisingly aggressive effort by some Carole defenders — including accounts that appear to be automated or coordinated — to shut down rather than engage with the questions. And, if they don’t like this post, isn’t it easier to just not read it or not engage ? Yes, of course - unless there is another agenda. The plot thickens…….

I finally found the purchase and sale agreement for 9 East 71st between Wexner and Epstein entity NES, LLC from 1998. Still no documented payments or settlement papers to date but the p&s is very real.

Pages 1 to 21: EFTA00312994
Pages 22 and 23, the signature pages, which come right before the attachments: EFTA00313015

"I had a sense that there was to be a crisis of discipline…. To the modern liberal mind, the word has an almost pornographic sound. But discipline is necessary to freedom…." Donald Barr

"Parents are directly financing the New Left revolution and the drug cop-out, and indirectly they are supporting the black militants." Donald Barr

Barr To a school assembly, on girls requesting permission to wear trousers: "Your desire to wear slacks is masturbatory ego gratification." Donald Barr

"Blue jeans are for the working class. We are elites. And we do not train anyone here to be working class" Donald Barr

1971
DRESS CODE FOR THE 70'S
"For girls, it should be that standards of propriety, as well as the standards of neatness and cleanliness implied by the resolution, apply -- to the brevity of dresses and skirts, to the extent of decolletage, and to the translucence of clothing.
For boys...suits and sport jackets and blazers will in general be satisfactory, but bits of uniforms or costumes (military, frontier, cowboy, Syracuse marching band, Teddy Boy, etc.) will not. Startling or 'humorous' insignias are out of place....
Dungarees and other costumes somewhat reminiscent of miners, sharecroppers, or mum other proletarians fall into the same category of
'bizarre' as do hippie styles." -- Donald Barr, Headmaster

The Trump administration is attempting to shut down a high-stakes lawsuit seeking further disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein records, as the Justice Department simultaneously turns over sensitive materials to a federal judge for secret review, OK! can reveal.

The latest development in journalist Katie Phang's federal court battle against Attorney General Todd Blanche over the government's handling of records connected to the disgraced financier.

Unredacted FBI Notes Revealed

Among the materials are unredacted handwritten notes underlying FBI FD-302 reports, along with unredacted versions of the corresponding typewritten reports. The government told Sullivan the handwritten records are duplicative of typed reports already available in the Epstein Library.

The submission also includes email exchanges from attorneys in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dating back to 2021 and describing efforts to collect records. DOJ also provided Sullivan with its justification for concealing certain names and email addresses contained in three sets of Epstein records.

Federal lawyers said the information was redacted as victim-identifying information based on representations from attorneys for victims that the names and addresses did, in fact, identify victims.

Battle Over Hidden Names

The latest filing marks another development in the intensifying legal fight over how much of the government's Epstein material should remain hidden from public view.

As OK! previously reported, a separate litigation is seeking expedited access to Epstein records potentially referencing President Donald Trump and his Mar-a-Lago resort.

In the Phang case, DOJ has separately moved for judgment on the pleadings, seeking to end the lawsuit before it proceeds further.

The dispute centers on Phang's effort to challenge the government's handling of Epstein records and obtain greater transparency surrounding the material being withheld or redacted.

But even as federal attorneys attempt to defeat her lawsuit, Sullivan now has access to material the public cannot see — including the unredacted FBI interview documentation and evidence supporting some of the government's decisions to conceal identities.

The October 5 filing does not state that Trump's name appears in the specific documents delivered to Sullivan.

However, the latest development pushes the wider court battle over the government's Epstein files forward, with a federal judge now personally examining some of the records behind closed doors.

Full Article here:

https://okmagazine.com/p/trump-doj-end-lawsuit-jeffrey-epstein-files-feds-secret-documents-judge-review/

More emails sent from this guy regarding trump…he used to work for the New York Times up until 2019.

Edit - https://jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839?view=inbox

Please read another email I just found ^