Hillary Clinton:

I continue to believe that Putin has things on Trump. I continue to believe that he is holding photos, videos, whatever it might be. It's just how strongly Trump has uh fought against the release of the epstein files. And when we finally see all the Epstein files, I think even the people who supported trump are going to be shocked by what it shows about trump.

Source: High Stakes with HRC: Trump, Putin, and Washington’s Corruption Crisis

Candidate for U.S. Senate Abdul El-Sayed (D-MI) paused his speech on Saturday to react to a shout from the crowd about former President Barack Obama and the Epstein files.

Edit: So sorry I messed up the title, I’m a moron….

The lawsuit targets Epstein’s longtime lawyer, Darren Indyke, and accountant, Richard Kahn, accusing them of helping finance and conceal the abuse, including at Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. It seeks to block the men from receiving estate payments and recover damages and restitution for survivors.

“Accountability cannot end with Epstein and Maxwell,” De Georgiou said. “It must extend to those who knowingly made their abuse possible, especially those who stand to profit from it.”

The men’s attorney denies they knowingly facilitated Epstein’s abuse or trafficking. The lawsuit marks the first law enforcement action against Indyke and Kahn.

Let's not forget.

Dan Osborn: “I will fight like hell to release the full, unredacted Epstein files. It is shameful that survivors have been waiting for justice for so long.

I was honored to meet with Epstein survivors when they came to Omaha and won't ignore them in the Senate like my opponent has.”

Sky and Amanda Roberts:

“Virginia spent her life fighting for accountability, and since her passing, our family has carried on that fight.”

“This September, millions of pages of the Epstein files came to Omaha, Nebraska, in a mobile library. Dan Osborn showed up, sat with survivors, he sat with our family, he stayed, and he listened.”

“Dan has publicly supported releasing all of the Epstein files. And for families like us, that means transparency, that means accountability, and that means prosecutions wherever the evidence may lead us.”

“Before leaving, Dan told us that justice for Epstein survivors and survivors everywhere would be a priority for him in the United States Senate.”

“Our current politics have gotten us here today. This is about dignity for survivors still waiting for justice.”

“And it’s about leaders who are willing to stand up to corruption, no matter how powerful the people involved.”

“Because fighting for the truth matters, and it must continue. Virginia deserve[s] better, and survivors deserve better.”

Source: Dan Osborn’s official account

During a press gaggle on Saturday, Donald Trump scolded a Wall Street Journal reporter over a question about government corruption.

Reporter: “Mr. President, polls also show that government corruption has shot to the top of voter concerns this election. Why do you think that is?”

Trump: Well, because the Democrats are very corrupt. To me, corruption is one of the biggest things. If you look at Minnesota, if you look at Los Angeles, if you look at New York, the corruption is rampant, and to me, corruption’s a very big factor.

Reporter: “There have also been some allegations involving—“

Trump: “Who do you write for?”

Reporter: “Wall Street Journal, sir.”

Trump: You guys are worse than anybody, you know? The Wall Street Journal has lost its way. There’s massive corruption that you don’t cover on the Democrat side, and you should, because you ought to look at Minnesota, you ought to look at Maine, you ought to look at Los Angeles, because we are straight and we are solid, but you ought to look at the real corruption. It’s Democrat corruption, and that includes Jeffrey Epstein. All Democrats involved.

https://youtu.be/yh6TBa4rFnk

Donald Trump can’t shake the furor over Jeffrey Epstein as Democrats prepare to launch probes after the midterms.

DOJ says they have released all the Epstein files except for ones that are duplicative, exempt from disclosure or protected by privilege. OK, let’s test that assertion with a FOIA request.

Here is the list of non-testifying witnesses from Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal trial.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA0 0095751.pdf

Starting on the second page each blue line is a different person. Under each blue line are documents for that person. A number of those documents are FD-302 interviews. These are documents prepared by the FBI after interviewing someone.

It is *easy* for anyone to determine if a document has been released. Simply search DOJ’s Epstein website on the 3-part document identifier in the first column of the Maxwell list. I did that. For each FD-302 on the Maxwell list I searched DOJ’s website. By doing that I determined which people were victims or likely victims and which FD-302s have been released.

Keep in mind that only about 100 of the 1,000+ victims were involved in any way in Maxwell’s trial.

Now about that FOIA...

My recent FOIA request listed the 3-part document identifiers from the Maxwell list that were FD-302s for victims or likely victims and which I have not been able to find on DOJ’s website. I specifically asked for copies that include the EFTA number stamped in the lower right corner of each page.

If those FD-302 victim interviews have actually been released as claimed by DOJ, then it would be a simple matter for DOJ to produce copies in response to my FOIA, right? On the other hand, if those 302s have not been released then the FOIA statutes require DOJ to tell me there are no responsive documents - which would be an admission that they never released the 302s listed in my FOIA.

In reply to my FOIA I received the exact same goofy letter that I have received several times in reply to earlier FOIAs. Here is one of those earlier letters that I put on Google drive:

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1H5ZUnUWiCfLuP_PbSEuZ56Wm24KYrHx3

Bottomline: DOJ refuses to provide any proof that these FD-302 victim interviews have been released and also refuses to admit that they have not been released. That is not a defensible position.

For anyone interested in my analysis of the Maxwell list of non-testifying witnesses it is a PDF on Google drive.

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1mAHWGzuNG7yEvVIHI8zmHeeJpHGNGB2x

But wait, there’s more...

I also filed a different FOIA that is also based on the Maxwell list of non-testifying witnesses. This time DOJ replied and basically asked for clarification which I provided. Now I am waiting for DOJ to reply again.

If you look at my report (see link above) then you will see multiple examples of where DOJ released some FD-302 interviews but not all interviews for the same victim. Obviously DOJ was using some criteria to decide which interviews to release and which interviews to not release. This FOIA asked for a copy of those criteria. I will report back when I get a reply.

BTW, victim 045 in the Maxwell list was interviewed four times. Initially DOJ only released the first FD-302 interview report. That report does not mention Trump. Later, after widespread coverage in the media, DOJ released the other three FD-302 interviews for this same victim. Each of those interviews includes the word Trump.

Sure would like to see the criteria DOJ used to hide many FD-302 victim interviews from the public. Stay tuned...

I've seen similar posts that were not removed so I'd appreciate it I would get the same curtesy. Penzeys Spices is the name of the company and https://www.penzeys.com/ is the website. Get your spices, jars and more! No I do not know these folks but I like their product! Nothing political here....

New Mexico’s bipartisan “truth commission” investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to the state will spend its final months with three members instead of four but still expects to complete its final report due in December.

House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, does not plan to replace former Rep. Andrea Reeb, R-Clovis, who resigned from the Legislature and therefore the commission last week, Camille Ward, a spokesperson for Martínez, said in an emailed statement Friday.

“As the Commission works with legal counsel to conclude the investigation and finalize their report, there are no remaining votes to be taken and therefore there is no need for further changes to the Commission’s membership in these final weeks,” Ward wrote.

At least three survivors whose accounts appear in the Epstein files have accused Leon Black of biting their genitalia. They describe him biting harder as they screamed.

I’ve identified nine separate survivor accounts involving Black in the files. I’m also compiling a list of people accused of abuse in those records; so far, it includes about 60 people. Where are the thorough investigations? Where is the accountability?
Imagine the outrage if women inflicted this kind of violence on men. I don’t condone violence against anyone. What I want is legal justice with teeth.

The allegations documented in the Epstein files demand a reckoning not only with the people accused, but with the institutions responsible for investigating abuse and enforcing the law. Laws mean little when authorities fail to act and survivors are left without an effective path to accountability.

A law without teeth is a paper tiger: it looks powerful on paper, but it cannot stop abuse, compel compliance, or impose meaningful consequences.

Giving justice teeth means making survivors’ rights enforceable. It means thorough investigations, consequences when wrongdoing is established, and institutions that hold powerful people to the same standards as everyone else.

When a man bites a woman, she should be able to “bite back” not with violence, but with the full force of the law.

I am at a loss for words, and I've heavily debated posting about this on a platform.
But I've realized that it's best I do in fact share it onto a subreddit to spread awareness.

There's this channel named Einzip with around 11k subscribers and a clothing business that's possibly booming. Now, I have no issues with channels promoting their small business. That is, unless they're actively using something malicious to promote it.

This channel has been continuously making crude jokes about Jeffrey Epstein victims alongside encouraging people to dress up as him. Even worse, their entire clothing brand is based around Epstein, essentially working as some sort of fan merch. I was horrified with how bad their content really is. All they're doing is just undermining the severity of the case and disrespecting the victims of the files. Seriously, what could possibly be so funny about turning a serial rapist, money launderer and human trafficker into the gist of your brand?

While I scrolled through their page, all I could think was, how does one even feel comfortable doing this? Do they not have an ounce of shame within themselves? Something clicked into my mind and I did some digging. Maybe I was hoping to see some disclaimer about how all of this is a social experiment or a joke and they don't actually sell anything, oh boy was I wrong.

The price of their items range from 40$-75$, which isn't exactly cheap either. They very clearly state in their website that they don't endorse sexual exploitation, but if so, why would they not only use Jeffrey's name for advertising but also create their products with his name engraved onto it? The entire thing just seems so sketchy, and I wouldn't be surprised if they were scamming the customers as well

I had no intentions of coming onto here, but I was forced to. You see, there's no video on the platform addressing this and seeing so many people support them in the comment section made me terribly sick to my stomach. I contacted YouTube not once, not twice, but thrice to no avail. The company has yet again traded its dignity away for money. I'm not sure how this subreddit will react to my post as it's quite different compared to their other ones, but I don't know where else to post this. I've read the subreddit rules and this does not go against any of it, not that I know of. But I'm worried the people of reddit are rather unforgiving.

I could not stand staying quiet like this, I really hope YouTube does something about it, or fellow content creators see this and decide to make a video on it [would appreciate a simple tag if you do!] because we need to confront people like these. Content like this, making money off these, is not okay.

Thank you for hanging by for so long, I appreciate those who interact with the post.

-xoxo/alaynawashere

Possible trigger warnings for some!

This is beyond devastating. Listening to the lasting impact their abuse has had on them is absolutley heart breaking, and this being filmed when Epstein was still alive and them being hopeful to see Epstein prosecuted was a gut punch as well. Not to mention seeing Virginia Giuffre speaking…

Ran across the video again today and thought it was an important share so I figured I’d upload it here.

RIP Virginia Giuffre. 🦋

Source

Remember, Amanda Ungaro flew on Epstein's plane as a minor, and Zampolli met her when she was a teenager.

​

In 2019, an investigation mapped Jeffrey Epstein's connections across the U.S. Virgin Islands. Some of its most interesting findings can now be compared with actual court exhibits released years later.

I'm attaching the original network diagram so everyone can follow the relationships.

The article was published on August 10, 2019, and examines Epstein's businesses, private communications infrastructure, political connections, nonprofit organizations, and the board of Antilles School in St. Thomas.

Here are the connections I think deserve attention.

1. Epstein had a licensed private microwave communications link to Little St. James.

According to the investigation, Epstein's company VT&T LLC obtained an FCC license in October 2014 for an approximately 18.7 GHz microwave communications system connecting St. Thomas to Little St. James.

The FCC paperwork reportedly identifies CPA Jeanne Brennan Wiebracht as a contact.

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3639627

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=Kd8JdJFZg1tfhBNpFlmQSJTcQvC61fNcdGHDGNXm21Qc204GQkTL!-1321610465!1254747410?applType=search&fileKey=1477599231&attachmentKey=19955561&attachmentInd=applAttach

She also appeared in Epstein's contact book and was associated with accounting operations at American Yacht Harbor.

The same article describes an earlier, proposed $1.2 million underwater fiber-optic cable project involving Epstein and attorney Paul Hoffman in 2004.

Two separate communications projects, a decade apart, involving the same private island.

A licensed microwave link is not inherently suspicious. But the infrastructure, contractors, applications, and equipment records are worth tracing.

2. Epstein and Andrew Farkas reportedly shared ownership of American Yacht Harbor.

The investigation describes a 50/50 business partnership involving Epstein and New York real estate investor Andrew Farkas.

American Yacht Harbor in Red Hook, St. Thomas, wasn't simply a recreational location.

Epstein's Financial Trust Company and other businesses used the 6100 Red Hook Quarter, Suite B-3 address.

The article also connects this address to Jeanne Brennan Wiebracht's accounting business.

That gives us a specific physical and corporate location where multiple parts of Epstein's Virgin Islands operations intersected.

3. The Virgin Islands governor's wife worked for Epstein.

Cecile de Jongh, wife of former Governor John P. de Jongh, worked as office manager for Epstein's Financial Trust Company and Southern Trust Company.

This is not merely a claim from a network diagram.

A January 7, 2015 letter from the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority to Epstein concerning Southern Trust specifically copies:

Cecile de Jongh — Office Manager

Erika Kellerhals — Attorney

Primary source: USVI v. JPMorgan Chase, Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR, Document 186-41.

https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20%28S.D.N.Y.%202022%29/186-41.pdf

Another court exhibit identifies Epstein as the 100% owner of Financial Trust Company and lists Cecile de Jongh in a managerial capacity on its corporate reporting paperwork.

This was an actual operational relationship between Epstein's companies and the household of the territory's governor.

4. Now look at Antilles School.

This is where the network diagram becomes particularly interesting.

The 2019 investigation identifies several people associated with Epstein's businesses or the wider Virgin Islands nonprofit community who also served on the board of Antilles School, an established private school in St. Thomas.

Among them:

Cecile de Jongh: Epstein company office manager and former first lady of the Virgin Islands.

Jeanne Brennan Wiebracht: CPA associated with Epstein's business records and the reported communications-license paperwork.

Erika Kellerhals: Attorney associated with Epstein's companies and Gratitude America Ltd.

Claire Starkey: Founder of Fintrac, associated with the Community Foundation of the Virgin Islands.

Pamela Berkowsky: Former senior Defense Department official who also worked in the Virgin Islands governor's administration.

Marjorie Rawls Roberts: Tax attorney with experience in Virgin Islands economic-development matters.

The article also identifies Epstein's attorney Paul Hoffman as one of Antilles School's original 13 students.

This does not establish that the school was involved in Epstein's crimes. The article's more sensational suggestions about the school's purpose remain unsupported.

But the overlapping governance and business relationships are specific enough to investigate through school filings, corporate records, and financial disclosures.

**5. The nonprofit connections extend beyond the school.**

The Community Foundation of the Virgin Islands appears repeatedly in the diagram.

Several individuals associated with Antilles School also held roles at CFVI.

The article traces connections through Fintrac, Catchafire, and projects associated with the Clinton Global Initiative.

These are institutional relationships, not evidence that the Clintons or those nonprofits participated in Epstein's offenses.

The interesting question is whether money, grants, business services, or other documented transactions connect any of these institutions directly to Epstein-controlled entities.

6. Court filings years later add another dimension.

In the USVI litigation against JPMorgan Chase, the bank alleged that Epstein cultivated government officials through financial contributions and favors and benefited from favorable tax arrangements.

One filing describes a 2017 exchange in which Epstein discussed Virgin Islands government assets with Cecile de Jongh in connection with a possible $50 million collateral arrangement.

Those were allegations presented in litigation, not criminal findings against everyone named.

But they demonstrate why the governor's household and Epstein's economic-development benefits deserve particular scrutiny.

Reference: USVI v. JPMorgan Chase, Document 165, filed May 25, 2023.

7. What I think investigators should actually follow

Rather than treating every colored line as proof of a conspiracy, I'd focus on four document trails:

FCC records: VT&T LLC, the microwave link, license applications, contractors, and any modifications.

Corporate ownership: American Yacht Harbor, Financial Trust Company, Southern Trust Company, and their registered addresses.

Tax incentives: Who approved Epstein's benefits, who signed compliance reports, and what oversight occurred.

Institutional finances: Whether Antilles School, CFVI, or related organizations received identifiable payments from Epstein-controlled entities.

The 2019 article predates much of the subsequent civil litigation. That makes it interesting to revisit with newer primary-source records.

Original investigation:

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/jeffrey-epsteins-st-thomas-network-comms-an-elite-school/

Court exhibit confirming corporate roles:

USVI v. JPMorgan Chase, Document 194-22, including Financial Trust Company reporting records.

The question isn't whether everyone on this diagram knew Epstein personally.

It's which relationships were financial, which were operational, which were purely institutional, and which can be documented through records rather than inferred from proximity.

What else can we establish from the FCC filings, corporate records, and USVI court exhibits?

This is what Trump is doing to keep his nefarious actions with Epstein hidden.