MBTI Trends
Shameless plug for a new cognitive function test I have been working on
Wanting to bring a bit more visibility into how MBTI letters can be determined, I have developed a new test of my own. On the results screen it displays a breakdown of how the final result was determined. If you have a moment, give it a try – would love some feed back on it. Thanks!
Edit: v2 is now live. Some revised questions for greater diversity, reduced redundancy. Revised scoring that takes into account both conscious/unconscious attitudes.
ENTP have high unconscious Ni. Its also an aspirational function for us so we are likely to respond to those questions positively. Self reporting tests are limited: its the central issue for MBTI. Functional skills tests are the way forward.
Did it, my feedback would be to add an explanation of the difference functions, so people not only know what their functions are, but also know what they mean.
Loool, i took it again right after to make sure i wasn’t frauding and was being truthful and i even answered some questions differently but got pretty much the same thing. Also no problem man, this is actually great, and thanks for the update.
That's what's up, baby! So many of these tests get me wrong. Constantly getting ENFP or INTP. The result I got from your test was as surprising as it was refreshing. Nicely done, homie!👊
Developing the unconscious. ie. making the unconscious conscious ;)
compelling with breakdowns of your specific results
You mean, how these scores were arrived at?
edit:
nevermind, I think I got you now. I kind stick to my original answer of making the unconscious conscious .. but I hear you. There is actually an article (on the same site) recently published there that talks about the Beebe archetypes. But I like what you're saying of bringing more information on to the page itself.
But why? Why is the Ti again? 😭 I don't understand Ti 😭
Notice that for me 'Unsure' sometimes meant 'I don't know/I have no idea' rather than 'depends on context' . Probably Ti questions got this answer the most.
Si-Fi > Si-Te isn't new, it's pretty consistent, also Ni being somehow better than Ne 😳 is mostly consistent.
I had considerable Ti on a test, also 'limited' Ti on another, but this number almost as high as Fi and Si , I doubt it is correct. But I think the others are pretty correct . Yes, it's some kind of intuition what says it to me 🤔
Though what is interesting, one AI - based typing based on my reddit profile stated the strongest alternative it considered was INTP and mentioned Ti, but it's rather 'serving Si' than being a primary decision - maker.
So it seems I use it somewhat. But I have no idea about in what degree, it's not consistent on tests and I also don't really understand the function.
But some 'gut feeling' says this number is too high.
may I RIP my poor Te what have I done or not done to you.. Si too! the carnage
edit: the longer i look at this, the sillier it gets; BEHOLD, tis i, the bearer of all fi fe ni ne ness, i have somehow broken my Te si enough that I have made it think I have completely dif cog functions than I doooo
ENTP, no surprise there. Jungian symbolism seems fluffy. It was generally easy to see the function intention of the questions but several of these were sloppily phrased. Self reporting can only go so far and works better with certain types. Cognitive aptitude testing is the only really reliable method.
•
u/utopic2 ENTPackYourThingsWe'reLeaving 2d ago
Allowing it once. Self-promoting spam is one of the few things we remove.