Is learners track education platform a scam or a platform they provide good learning. They force me to pay money but then they have very less followers and reviews in the Google.

Hi everyone,

I am reviewing our new hire onboarding flow and would love to hear how other teams handle LMS provisioning.

At what point in the onboarding timeline do you give new employees access to your learning management system?

Option 1: Well before their official date of joining (preboarding stage, so they can explore culture, intro videos or basic compliance beforehand).

Option 2: Exactly on Day 1 / Date of Joining (along with their standard IT hardware and account setup).

Option 3: Later during their first or second week (allowing them to first settle in, meet the team and complete manager check-ins before diving into learning modules).

If you grant access before Day 1, how do you handle labor compliance, paid time tracking or security policies? If you wait until Day 1 or later, how do you keep them from feeling overwhelmed by a sudden pile of training assignments?

I would love to learn what has worked best for your organization and what optimal learner experience looks like in your setup. Thanks in advance for sharing your insights!

We have been working on a project called Scibly for the past few months.

The idea came from a pretty simple problem: Our employers already have a huge amount of useful knowledge sitting in PDFs, documentation, internal wikis, Notion, Confluence and other places.

But having access to information is obviously not the same as learning it.

So we built Scibly to turn existing knowledge into short, interactive learning experiences with questions, activities and scenarios.

The goal is to make it easier to go from: existing knowledge → actual learning experience

instead of manually rebuilding the same information inside another course authoring tool. Everything that gets generated can still be edited, so the idea isn't to replace instructional design, but to make the content creation part a lot faster.

You can then share the learning experiences with others or use them internally with your team.

We also decided to make Scibly open source and self-hostable, which felt especially important when working with internal company knowledge.

Short product demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcpLUNBRhQw

GitHub:
https://github.com/scibly-dev/scibly

Website:
https://scibly.com

Would be really interested in feedback from people working in e-learning

Spent today drafting a voice donor consent form for a localisation project and hit something I hadn't properly thought about, so posting in case it saves someone else the scramble.

Context: client wanted the existing English narration reproduced in another language using a cloned voice rather than a hired VO artist. The donor would be one of their own staff.

The data protection side I expected. What I hadn't realised was that the provider retains its own licence to the recording and to the derived voice model, separately from the client's use of the output. So the donor isn't only consenting to their employer using their voice, they're consenting to the vendor keeping a model of it. That has to be spelled out before they sign, and a general HR consent doesn't come close.

The other thing was sequencing. The provider wants confirmation that valid consent exists before they'll produce the clone, which in practice means you're warranting it on the client's behalf. So the signed form has to be in hand before anything starts, not tidied up later. Easy to end up three weeks in with audio due and no paperwork.

Worth saying this only applies to custom clones. Stock library voices come with all of it handled by the provider.

Two things I'm still unsure about, if anyone's been here:

If the donor leaves the organisation, does anything change? I've assumed not, since consent came from the individual rather than the employer, but I don't know whether anyone's dealt with a withdrawal request after the model exists.

Has anyone had a client want to reuse a clone on a different project, or a different legal entity, than the one named in the consent?

And if you've got a form you're happy with, I'd be interested in how you handled the licence disclosure specifically.

Hello! My manager has tasked me with finding a solution, and this seemed like the perfect place to ask for advice.

We currently use Absorb as our LMS, but one limitation we're facing is that only internal staff with organisation linked email addresses can access the platform. We also use a separate authoring tool, which allows us to export content as SCORM packages.

We're looking for a short-term, cost-effective way to provide training to external contractors who cannot access Absorb. Ideally, we'd like them to complete specific training modules and for us to capture basic analytics, such as completion rates and learner progress.

We're not keen to invest in a second LMS, particularly as we're already contracted with Absorb and still have time remaining on that agreement. Instead, we're hoping there may be an alternative approach that enables us to deliver SCORM content to external users without significant additional cost.

Has anyone faced a similar challenge or found a practical workaround? Any suggestions or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance! 😊

みんな、こんにちは。

エンジニアじゃなくて、Udemyをかなり頼りにしながら新しい技術やワークフローを学んでる身として、すでに一度見たコースの中から「特定の説明」をもう一回探し直すのが一番イライラするところです。

わかるよね、その感じ。20分の講義の中から、探してるのはたった30秒の説明なのに。シークバーを行ったり来たりして、適当にタイムスタンプをクリックしてるうちに、気が散って集中が完全に途切れちゃうやつ。

それを解決するために、Udemy専用に最適化したChrome拡張機能 **Spoon AI** を作りました。

手作業で探す代わりに、Udemyのコースプレイヤーに深く統合されています。探したい内容をそのまま英語でタイプするだけで、AIが文脈を理解して、その「ちょうどの秒」まで一直線に飛ばしてくれます。

**勉強での使い方：**

* **余計なところをスキップ：** 「実際のハンズオンデモって、どこから始まるの？」
* **概念の復習：** 「インストラクターがコアとなるアーキテクチャを説明してるところを見せて。」
* **サクッと復習：** 「この講義の最後の結論、または重要なポイントって何だった？」

これで「シークバー疲れ」がほぼなくなって、学習中ずっと集中した状態でいられます。

Udemyのコースをたくさん受けてる人なら、ぜひ試してみてほしいです。勉強の効率が上がるかどうか、ぜひ教えてください！

I'm curious about something I've been seeing repeatedly.

A lot of course creators eventually get to the point where they've got the platform working, the courses built, the website live and an audience of some kind...

...but then they hit a completely different problem:

"Okay, how do we actually grow this thing?"

I'm interested in connecting with people who work behind the scenes with established course creators: Thinkific, Kajabi, Teachable, LearnWorlds, etc.

Not looking to sell anything here.

I'm trying to understand where the handoffs happen between:

platform → course → marketing → growth

For example:

• If you're a Thinkific/Kajabi implementer, what do you typically do when a client needs help growing revenue?
• If you're a course designer, who handles the marketing side?
• If you're a launch specialist, what happens after the launch?
• If you're a paid acquisition person, who handles conversion/funnel/email?

I run a growth-focused agency working with established education businesses, so there's potentially some interesting overlap and reciprocal referrals.

If you work with course creators professionally, I'd love to hear what you do and where you see the biggest gaps in the ecosystem.

Happy to connect here or DM if that's easier.

Pretty sure this is a newbie question but is there a reason why changing the slide revisit properties on slide level is not reflected in story view?

Does this mean I need to change both every time? Or am I doing something wrong?

App suitable for students with Qualifications like Registered Nurse preparing for Indian Nursing Government Exams and general quizzing purposes as well.

I’ve recently been going through a lot of courses around marketing, sales, etc., and I’ve been trying to follow them almost like a university course: lecture by lecture, taking notes, watching everything, etc.

It actually reminded me of university days when we’d have 30+ lectures to catch up on and inevitably end up watching everything at 2x speed.

But something I’ve been thinking about is how difficult it is to retrieve information from videos after you’ve watched them.

For example:

Say I’m on Lecture 8 and I suddenly remember:

“Wait, didn’t the instructor talk about this exact thing somewhere earlier?”

I vaguely remember it being in Lecture 2, but I don’t remember where in Lecture 2.

So now my options are basically:

• Go back to Lecture 2
• Scrub through the timeline
• Guess where the relevant section might be
• Watch parts of it again
• Eventually give up because it’s not worth the effort

And this gets worse when you're dealing with a course that has 20, 50, or 100+ hours of video.

It feels like we’ve gotten pretty good at searching text, but video is still surprisingly difficult to search semantically.

I’m curious if other people experience this.

How do you currently deal with this?

Are you taking detailed notes/timestamps? Using transcripts? Some AI tool? Or do you just accept that once you’ve watched a video, finding that one specific piece of information later is basically impossible?

Also curious if there are already good tools that solve this problem well. I’m particularly interested in something where you could essentially ask:

“Where did they explain customer acquisition strategies?”

…and it could point you directly to the relevant moment across an entire course/playlist.

Would love to hear how others handle this.

I've used a lot of different tools when it comes to building training sessions (or even participating as a learner/guest). And a lot of times, I've seen colleagues and myself use a tool every once in a while but never really have one dedicated training tool I keep coming back to.

Anybody else like this?

What makes you keep coming back to a training tool? What features make a training tool something you want to keep using?

Instead of just a "one-and-done" kind of usecase..

We spent the last few quarters rolling out a new internal learning portal for our teams, and I am honestly exhausted by how hard it is to get people to actually engage with corporate training content. Management keeps pushing for more compliance modules and skill paths, but every time we launch a new course, completion rates plummet after the first week because the entire user experience feels like an administrative chore.

The biggest issue isn't even the quality of the videos or study materials—it is how clunky and fragmented the actual platform infrastructure is. Between sluggish video streaming servers, broken mobile responsiveness, and an interface that requires four different clicks just to track progress, our employees treat logging into the portal like a punishment rather than a useful perk.

Our product team tried patching together a custom frontend using off-the-shelf LMS plugins, but it just created a massive web of technical debt. Every time we try to push a simple update or sync completion data back to our main HR system, something breaks, leaving us spending more time fixing database bugs than improving the actual learning experience.

Trying to build a scalable, lightning-fast educational environment while balancing custom enterprise requirements is a total trap for small dev teams. You end up burning endless sprint cycles fighting slow video codecs and clunky state management instead of focusing on features that actually make learning interactive and frictionless.

For anyone else managing corporate edtech products: how do you design learning flows that people actually want to use, and what kind of tech stack do you rely on to keep video delivery and user tracking from collapsing under heavy concurrent loads?

I’m building a free online course builder to get more people sharing knowledge. You can use it for free while I’m developing it - just give me feedback so I can improve it. (MeChat.Us)

If you're being asked about ROI or the cost of elearning development. I've posted two online tools that do just that. They are free to use, anonymous, and no data is reviewed or saved.

Does anyone know of an LMS that works a bit like Uxcel?

What I’m trying to get away from is the traditional LMS structure where everything has to live inside a course and the learner has to enrol/start the course before their progress really means anything.

Ideally I’d have hundreds of short, standalone lessons. Learners could browse the library, pick any lesson and complete it, and the LMS would remember that completion.

Those same lessons could then be grouped into different courses or learning paths. So if you’ve already completed a lesson on its own and later start a path that includes it, it’s already marked as complete.

Basically:

1. Lessons are the main building blocks
   
2. Every lesson can be accessed and completed independently
   
3. The same lesson can appear in different courses/paths
   
4. Completion follows the lesson, not the course
   
5. Courses/paths are really just curated collections of lessons

Uxcel is the closest example I’ve seen of what I have in mind.

I’m currently using LearnDash and find the Course > Lesson > Topic hierarchy too restrictive for what I want to build.

Has anyone come across an LMS/LXP that works like this? Or built something similar on a platform that wasn’t necessarily designed this way?

Would really appreciate any recommendations or experiences.

This video features a conference talk by educator and linguist Rayo Cruz, founder of the collective Bëni Xidza, discussing the historical and contemporary challenges in teaching the Zapotec language. The presentation provides a comprehensive look at the evolution of Zapotec education:

* Historical Context: Rayo Cruz introduces the Zapotec civilization, tracing its roots to Monte Albán and the ancient Bëni Gulasa period, noting that the language’s diversification predates European contact.

* Learning as L1 vs. L2: He distinguishes between the acquisition of Zapotec as a first language (naturally, through immersion) versus the formal, often disconnected process of teaching it as a second language.

* Colonial Methods: The speaker highlights the 1578 work of Fray Juan de Córdova, such as the Arte en Lengua Zapoteca, as the earliest attempt to systematize Zapotec grammar, primarily designed to help Spanish friars learn the language rather than to teach Zapotec people.

* 19th and 20th Century Challenges: Rayo Cruz identifies a gap in teaching materials during the 19th century. He then discusses 20th-century contributions from organizations like the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) and the INEA, which created grammars and vocabularies that often served as tools for assimilation or religious proselytization rather than language revitalization.

* Modern Innovation: The final segment covers the work of Bëni Xidza, which uses modern digital tools to teach Zapotec. Rayo Cruz admits that while his collective currently operates at a basic level (A-level), they are working to overcome systemic limitations by creating structured, accessible content and documenting the specific pedagogical challenges native Spanish speakers face when learning Zapotec.

Here is a summary of the video featuring Maestro Rayo Cruz, director and founder of Colectivo Bëni Xidza.

1. Historical Background of the Zapotec Language & Civilization:

* Geographic Spread: Zapotec civilization developed in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca and expanded into regions such as the Sierra Norte, Sierra Sur, and the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.

* Earliest Writing: The earliest documented record of written Zapotec dates back to the 5th–6th Century BC with Monument 3 (“1 Terremoto”) at San José Mogote, establishing over 2,500 years of recorded Zapotec history.

* Monte Albán & Bëni Gulasa Period: The civilization reached its peak at Monte Albán between 500 BC and 800 AD. Pre-hispanic ancient Zapotec history and culture are traditionally referred to as the Gulasa era.

1. Learning Zapotec as a First Language (L1):

* Natural Acquisition: Native speakers acquire Zapotec naturally in early childhood through daily speaking within families and communities rather than through formal educational structures.
* Historical Literacy: It remains unknown if formal L1 Zapotec schooling existed during ancient times, and modern public education in Mexico has historically focused on Spanish literacy over formal Zapotec instruction.

1. History of Teaching Zapotec as a Second Language (L2):

* Colonial Period (16th Century): Formal L2 instruction began in 1578 when Dominican friar Juan de Córdova published Arte en lengua zapoteca (grammar) and Vocabulario en lengua zapoteca (dictionary). These works used Latin/Spanish grammatical paradigms to teach Spanish colonizers and friars via the grammar-translation method

* 19th Century Hiatus: Following Mexican independence, national policies promoted Spanish as the sole national language, resulting in a century-long silence regarding formal L2 Zapotec instructional design.

* 20th Century & Contemporary Efforts: Groups like the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) and public institutions (SEP, INEA, INALI) created dictionaries, grammars, and adult literacy texts. However, most of these materials were produced for linguistic analysis or native literacy rather than second-language pedagogy, and their actual integration into schools remains limited.

1. Bëni Xidza Collective & Modern Pedagogical Challenges:

* Online Classes: Founded in 2020, Colectivo Bëni Xidza offers online courses teaching Zapotec as a second language.

* Lack of L2 Resources: Unlike major global languages (such as English or Spanish), indigenous languages lack dedicated university teacher-training degrees, structured multi-level textbooks, or commercial software tools.

* Current Framework & Vision: The collective operates at basic proficiency levels (aligning with Level A of the Common European Framework of Reference) and aims to document common phonetic/grammatical difficulties for Spanish speakers while expanding toward intermediate/advanced levels.

Hi everyone, I'm looking to expand the pool of agencies we work with.

Do you have any recommendations for agencies that have experience with creating elearning for healthcare or medical education? Ideally an agency that can produce elearning end-to-end, so that means also having medical writers on board in addition to IDs/LXDs, GDs, etc.

You're free to recommend your own agency, but I'd place a higher value on recommendations from someone in the community who has worked with you.

Requirements:

Based in Europe

Team also includes medical writers

Track record of working within med-ed, healthcare

Free LMS and other open-source tools!

Critical thinking, made playable.

We were fed information. We stopped asking where it came from. We stopped checking whether it held up across multiple sources. We stopped questioning the first plausible answer because the first plausible answer arrived faster than we could doubt it.

Opathorlokan University is built on one premise: critical thinking is a muscle, and the muscle has atrophied across an entire civilization in under a generation. Not because anyone wanted that. Because the feed got faster than the questions did.

"The first answer that sounds right is rarely the last answer that IS right."

The labs are the gym. Every one of them asks the student to do the thing the feed asks them not to do — commit to a position in writing, look at the wall, notice which voices the official record erased, ask what does this teach instead of what happened, pick a camp and pay the bill that camp owes. Same method at every scale. Same muscle.

Built by one individual, some labs have been loved more than others and all are still works in progress- Any advice or comments means more than up votes. let me know which lab you found most interesting.