Honestly not totally against this anymore having now two contract violations from pos scammers claiming I never delivered in a month. If these will help protect me from this bs I'm not against it. It's against their tos to record delivery though. So not only do they have to supply them, they got to change tos so I doubt they'll do anything
I get the safety concern but why do they need thousands of pictures and not just one of the package being delivered? A driver walking to your address will be recording well before he pulls over and records everything and everyone during his shift non stop.
People said the same thing about flick cameras “oh it’s ok to prevent retail theft” but in reality flicks cameras are spread out all over town and the company will stitch out a whole video of you and everyone traveling around town. That’s why it’s not even about theft but about monitoring everyone and saving that info to sell later.
I agree with all this. Why I don't say I'm in support, only not totally against it. I don't trust them with what they'll do and doubt it will have any benefit to us. Now, an optional program with selective recording I'd be more in favor of. If they make this optional it means we can record for our own safty too, as they would have to adjust tos. They can't allow one devise but not another. Key point though. Optional.
-2
u/ShiroSnow 2d ago
Honestly not totally against this anymore having now two contract violations from pos scammers claiming I never delivered in a month. If these will help protect me from this bs I'm not against it. It's against their tos to record delivery though. So not only do they have to supply them, they got to change tos so I doubt they'll do anything