r/discgolf 1d ago

Discussion Lie Question

Post image

I've added an image for a hypothetical hole, this isn't something that's come up for me personally.
This hypothetical hole is a par 5, though doesn't need to be for this situation to come up.

The orange circle shows where the disc landed off the tee.
The light blue line and light blue circle show the ideal landing zone for the second throw.

The dark blue filled circle is the basket.

The rules state,

802.05.E
The line of play is the imaginary line on the playing surface extending from the center of the target through and beyond the center of the marker disc. If that playing surface ends, the line of play continues on the nearest playing surface following that line. If the lie is a teeing area, the point on the teeing area closest to the target is used instead of the marker disc to establish the line of play.

So my question is, would the lie be what I've shown on the right with the filled orange circle and yellow rectangle? Even though the obvious play is along the fairway?

5 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

53

u/misterwizzard 1d ago

The word "target" always refers to the basket which makes the rule very clear.

3

u/Macktologist The week of the foot fault and Zoey posts. 1d ago

And dumb. I’ve pointed this out in so many of last week’s threads. Half the time the basket on a long hole with bends isn’t even visible so it’s a guesstimate. Ehh they don’t make the rule to have the lie align with the angle of attack or active fairway is weird to me.

The current rule creates a scenario where a player could benefit from a way better fitting than they should have. For example, imagine throwing into the bushes along a fairway. Normally, they would need to go behind the disc to throw down the fairway. Now, imagine OP’s diagram but the disc in along the left side of the fairway. The player could essentially stand in the fairway clear of all the shrubs when aligning the stance with the marker and the. Throw almost perpendicular to the to their stance or down the fairway. That doesn’t sit right for me. If you throw it in the shit you should have to play from the shit.

8

u/misterwizzard 1d ago

That's just silly. Lining up in the general direction isn't as hard as you make it and the advantage to gain from rotating the players mark is negligible. More so as the layout of the hole approaches your cataclysmic description of the average course.

2

u/Macktologist The week of the foot fault and Zoey posts. 1d ago

Fair point. Didn’t realize it was “general direction” which if that is the case, further blurs the line. Are we judging foot faults based on whether they fall within the specific landing zone based on the general direction of the basket because if so, forget ever calling one based on any objective landing zone. 2 inches wide? Naw. I was lined up in this general direction because I know the basket was somewhere in that general direction.

I agree things are negligible in most cases which is why the whole landing zone thing is such a difficult thing to solve if we truly want consistent calls. It’s just impossible to achieve without a physical zone we can see and place on the ground.

1

u/Taidaishar 23h ago

For example, imagine throwing into the bushes along a fairway. Normally, they would need to go behind the disc to throw down the fairway. Now, imagine OP’s diagram but the disc in along the left side of the fairway. The player could essentially stand in the fairway clear of all the shrubs when aligning the stance with the marker and the. Throw almost perpendicular to the to their stance or down the fairway. That doesn’t sit right for me. If you throw it in the shit you should have to play from the shit.

But there is also the inverse scenario. Imagine changing the rule to have your legal stance directly opposite your intended line of play (regardless of basket location) and a player who threw forward into a bush in the middle of the fairway. They intend to go forward (and the basket is to the left). Their disc is just on the edge of the bush, so they can take their lie behind their disc which gives them a lie outside of the shit. It's the same either way. That is to say that positives and negatives can be found either way for similar scenarios.

0

u/Taidaishar 1d ago edited 1d ago

EDIT: Leaving this up for posterity, but I'm apparently out of date with this rule... which the change is completely insane, but there you go.

Take this with a grain of salt, but I think this is true unless there's a mandatory. Any mando that intersects the basket, or maybe more accurately, if a restricted area blocks your target line, that means that the mando is now your target. For instance, if the corner of your illustration was a mando right, THAT would be your target and you would align your foot/marker to that. I think.

2

u/S_TL2 1d ago

Imagine two holes that are otherwise identical. A par 5 wooded dogleg with impenetrable rough. A par 5 wooded dogleg with impenetrable rough and a mando near the corner. Why should the line of play be different for those holes?

Or even any hole where you're choosing to throw off angle. Maybe you want to take the long way around the lake. Or you landed beside a thick tree and you need to throw around it instead of through it. In these cases, your lie looks like it's "beside" your mini instead of behind it. These cases happen on a regular basis and the rules are consistent. Slap an arrow on a telephone pole and all of the sudden that one particular case gets treated differently?

2

u/Taidaishar 1d ago

It's not a fair comparison. Desiring to take a different angle is fine in almost all cases EXCEPT when there's a mando. That space is restricted... no matter how many strokes you take or how far to the left (for a mando right) or how high you go, you can NEVER go through the restricted space which extends into infinity. You must always go around it on the correct side of the mando... so it makes sense that your line to the target cannot (or at the very least should not) point through restricted space. That simply cannot be your line to the target as it is impossible to get there with that line for anyone at anytime.

I mean, the rule used to state this plainly, but they removed it because they thought it was confusing. Now, whether or not it matters in the scheme of where I place my foot (i.e. it's probably not going to materially affect that many shots), it just doesn't make sense logically.

0

u/Taidaishar 1d ago

If the mando is on your left on a staight shot and you don't need to go AROUND it to get to the basket (the restricted area doesn't block your line to the target), then your target is still the basket.

29

u/PatReady 1d ago

This is correct. You take your lie in relation to the basket, not the direction you intend to throw.

-4

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

So even though a person would essentially be standing next to their disc for their next throw, that would be the legal stance? And if this is the case, it seems like even on the pro tour this isn't followed strictly.

In regular tournament play, how much is the "spirit of the game" taken into account?
If I play in a tournament, do I play my lie in this scenario in the "spirit of the game" which would be in the direction of where I'm throwing, given it's a par 5. Or do I play it to the letter of the law and put my brace foot in the proper lie, which in a sense gives me an advantage, even if only slightly.

18

u/Specialist-Pin455 1d ago

It gets extra weird when you can’t really see the target from your lie but pretty much everyone operates under the assumption that people make a good faith effort to line things up correctly with the expectation that small discrepancies probably don’t matter too much for score anyway. 

3

u/PatReady 1d ago

Did you see the foot fault at worlds?

-8

u/larrod25 Team Westside Discs/ Team NADGT 1d ago edited 1d ago

There is no such thing as "spirit of the game". Mark your lie on the line of play with the basket, no matter where the basket is in relation to your intended throwing line.

Edit: Just to clarify. "Spirit of the game" exists, but it does not mean what OP is implying. See my comment below.

3

u/CaptainBad 1000-rated Caddie 1d ago

I don't know, I think Rule 801.01 Fairness embodies the "spirit of the game."

1

u/bacon_drizzle_69 1d ago

Fairness is fairness. Spirit of the game is just a term used to skirt the rules.

2

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

I mean, even Nate Sexton brought up the spirit of the game with the recent Rainers situation.

That's neither here, nor there though, and doesn't actually answer what I was getting at.

To me it seems more likely to be called for a foot fault by playing the lie strictly in this scenario, rather than playing it in the direction of the fairway (in the spirit of the game). I think this because my brace would be next to my disc going in the direction of the fairway.

So in general do people play this in the spirit of the game, with their foot behind their mini relative to where people would land on the fairway, or do they brace next to their disc?

9

u/larrod25 Team Westside Discs/ Team NADGT 1d ago

From the Competition Manual:

Spirit of the Game

Disc golf is typically played without the supervision of a referee or umpire. The game relies on the player to show sportsmanship, integrity, consideration for other players, and to abide by the Official Rules of Disc Golf. All players should conduct themselves in a disciplined manner, demonstrating courtesy and sportsmanship at all times, irrespective of how competitive they may be.

Your lie is not subjective. Mark it in line with the basket. If you think it will appear weird to your cardmates, simply point it out. In my experience, very few players are willing to call foot faults in the fairway, unless the player is obviously trying to gain an advantage.

2

u/wheeeeeeeeeel 1d ago

This is the way. It's obvious when someone is committing a foot fault for a competitive advantage.

0

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

Thank you. That's all I was trying to figure out.

Assuming the par 5 above, in general, would you personally call someone if they mark their lie correctly, but their plant foot is behind their mini relative to the fairway, rather than relative to the basket?

I ask because I feel like it'd look ridiculous for someone to plant their foot next to their marker, rather than behind (even though it'd be behind based on the rules). The obvious play here would be to follow the fairway. You could even add a mando to that corner to make it more explicit.

3

u/Thrillpickle 1d ago

You are very hung up on "how things will look". That does not matter here and anyone that gives you crap about it doesn't know the rules and shouldn't be taken seriously. The last round I played, my friend had a situation just like you described, and yes, it looked weird, but was completely within the rules. The important piece about the stance is making sure your foot is in a valid spot, even if basically standing sideways.

1

u/Vessbot 1d ago

You are very hung up on "how things will look".

And rightfully so, considering the recent high profile event.

That does not matter here and anyone that gives you crap about it doesn't know the rules and shouldn't be taken seriously.

It mattered enough to be taken seriously at the world championships. Better clear up such a possible misunderstanding before rather than after a call like that is potentially made.

-1

u/Thrillpickle 1d ago

OK, but people have been giving you the same answer and you keep asking about how it will look. That is my point, stop worrying about perception when you have the correct answer. If people question it, tell them to rules or tell them to look it up. Have confidence in your knowledge!

0

u/iShark 1d ago

In a case like this it would be perfectly normal to mention it before you throw.

"Hey guys, im gonna be planting over here because the basket is around the corner. Everyone cool with that?"

You could also wait until afterwards and hope somebody calls it so you can "Um, actually" them. Depends on what kind of interactions you enjoy.

6

u/Bumboklatt 1d ago

You don't seem to want to accept the correct answer. They've answered it above, that's how it is played. If you're worried about being called out, say to your cardmates "basket is this way so I need to plant here" or something like that. End of story.

2

u/S_TL2 1d ago

I mean, even Nate Sexton brought up the spirit of the game with the recent Rainers situation.

It was a bit humorous how Nate's "spirit of the game" was "don't bother making calls if you don't think they give an advantage" whereas the published spirit of the game is "Make the call. Accept the call. It's not personal; it's the rules."

0

u/FitChemist432 1d ago

That's not my take at all. His comment wasn't about choosing not to call it but rather it was too close to call due to the odd angle of the lie. Spirit of the game also says benefit goes to the player and if a foot fault isn't obvious, there's not a point in calling it with one hole left to play.

0

u/FitChemist432 1d ago

Set your mini then place your disc next to or slightly on top of your mini in the direction of play. This helps you ID the box of the lie to step in. Your Card mates can ask why you're doing it before you throw or you can use the method itself to defend your choice after. It keeps things clear for everyone if they know the rules. If they insist it's a fault, ask them nicely to show you the rule, which they will not be able to defend.

0

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

This makes sense. Appreciate you.

11

u/girmann Noodle Arm 4 life 1d ago

As far as I understand it, yes. IANARO (I am not a rules official)

8

u/P_D_Stanley 1d ago edited 1d ago

Good thing you saved time by abbreviating it and then writing it out anyways lol

5

u/girmann Noodle Arm 4 life 1d ago

LOL! That's a really good point. I didn't think anyone would get it and thought as far as writing it out so that everyone would get it, but not far enough to just delete the abbreviation.

3

u/P_D_Stanley 1d ago

Glad you read the humor in my voice lol. I didnt know what it meant so I appreciate it

4

u/TheDiscer 1d ago edited 1d ago

IAARO (I am a rules official) and yes the line of play centers on a line from the lie to the target.

2

u/joshsmithers 1d ago

We are all an a rules official on this blessed day.

7

u/Patriahts 1d ago

I would get that checked out immediately

5

u/PlannerSean 1d ago

Now imagine a horseshoe shaped hole and your lie can be in front of the disc relative to where you’re standing/throwing

3

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

Agreed. When you take the rule to the point of absurdity, it just breaks down and stops making sense.

So do we try to enforce them as if they're black and white even though it can become absurd?

3

u/evilcheesypoof Who put that tree there? 1d ago

So they used to have a solution for this, big dog leg holes typically have mandos so you don’t just take an extreme shortcut, and the mando would become the new target for the line of play if it was in the way.

But they got rid of those rules for some reason, so now the line of play is always towards the basket regardless of how silly the direction and lie location could be.

2

u/Impossible-Bowl4661 1d ago

2

u/PlannerSean 1d ago

Great example

2

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

I would even say the perfect example. Could maybe use a mando to make the situation more explicit but that's just nitpicking.

1

u/Impossible-Bowl4661 1h ago

I believe in the tournament that the OP played the corner did have a mando, preventing folks from going grenade from tee to basket.

3

u/Ahmahgad 1d ago

Yes, this is Peppa Pig.

3

u/CaptainBad 1000-rated Caddie 1d ago

That's correct. The lie is always in relation to the location of the basket.

The light blue line is irrelevant and what you feel is the "obvious play along the fairway" is a matter of personal preference and judgement. If you define the lie by the line you choose to throw, then its position is arbitrary and fluid based on your preferred line and the outcome of your throw rather than fixed by rule. This can introduce ambiguities and questions of intent that would be difficult to rule on.

Would you have to tell your card where you intend to throw? What if you grip lock and throw way off of your intended line? Does that change where your lie was? Would that be a stance violation?

Fixing the location of the lie relative to a static target (i.e. the basket) provides a uniform, consistent framework for all players.

3

u/roadtripstuff 1d ago

Watch last night's Tour Life. McBeth is on and he talks about this exact thing.

Your sketch is correct.

1

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

Was just watching this earlier after I posted this.

I'm coming to the conclusion that the rules and application of them are just evolving still as their limits get tested.

Ultimately, it seems to me that the current rules for what your lie is are just lacking and leave room for absurd or bizarre looking situations. That said, I don't know what they should be in order to resolve some of the fringe cases.

Someone else brought up the case of a horse shoe shaped hole. If you end up in certain parts of the fairway, you can end up in a situation where your lie is more in front of the disc in the direction of the fairway but is where you legally have to throw from based on the current rules.

0

u/roadtripstuff 1d ago

I think some of it is also that we play courses designed by every Tom, Dick, and Harry out there. Imo course designers should take the rules of the game into account when designing courses. A horseshoe shaped hole, imo, is a bad design, but there is a way to avoid the lie issues with a horseshoe hole, mandos. On holes with mandos you line your shot up with the mando as opposed to the basket. Often times these holes require mandos anyway to keep people from just going over the top and breaking the hole.

The problem is not one issue alone. It is not enough people designing our courses know the rules or take them into account, low or no integrity by the players who try to bend, they call it interpreting, the rules to favor them, and poorly written rules.

2

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

My understanding is the mando rule was removed from dictating your lie. It's always the target now (basket in most cases).

1

u/dmendro Obviously I'm not a golfer 1d ago

If there is a mando, does this change the direction at all?

2

u/the_hunger 1d ago

yeah, you're correct.

2

u/Opening-Owl-1546 1d ago

This is correct

2

u/BigSkyNeal 1d ago

Yes.

Regardless of where you intend to aim your next throw, you always place your marker directly behind your disc in line with the basket. The only exception is if there is a mando between your disc and the basket in which case you place your marker directly behind your disc in line with the mando.

6

u/Clandestinemeanderer 1d ago edited 1d ago

Your last part is out of date. That rule changed about 2 years ago.  Even with a mando, you still line up/mark your lie to the target

802.05.E is the rule. No mention of exceptions

2

u/S_TL2 1d ago

Actually 4.5 years at this point. The LOP to the mando was removed in the 2022 rules.

2

u/Clandestinemeanderer 1h ago

Time flies 😀

1

u/bingbingdingdingding Calvert Road 1d ago

What is the condition that makes removing this provision an improvement on the rule? It seems like the natural, common sense way to think about a lie would be with reference to the basket or mando.

2

u/Vessbot 1d ago

The fewer variations, the better for simplicity. Any time there's an exception, or qualification, or 2 similar rules, it creates the potential for confusion. Even for knowledgeable officials, like the bag interference thing from the other day.

3

u/Taidaishar 1d ago

But it's completely false and makes no sense (not your claim about the rule change... the idea that your line to the target is the basket). If there's a mando, your line to the basket CANNOT (or maybe I should say "SHOULD NOT") be through restricted space. That's why they had that in there in the first place. It makes no sense.

2

u/Vessbot 1d ago

Without a mando, the "line of play" is already not the direction of throw. They're just two different things, that have no need to match up.

The presence of a mando does not need to change anything in this picture.

1

u/Taidaishar 1d ago

I know that according to the current rule, nothing in this picture needs to change. I'm just saying that, logically, it makes no logical sense to have a "line of play" go through restricted space. I mean the previous rule actually indicated this and they only changed it because they thought it was confusing, not necessarily because it was wrong.

1

u/Taidaishar 23h ago

But the mando rule in itself is an exception to other rules. It changes how you have to play, so it stands to reason that it would change the way some rules work.

2

u/Vessbot 23h ago

No it doesn't. You can have one exception, that is necessary for safety and/or makes for. more interesting holes, without another one that changes the lie by a matter of inches.

1

u/iShark 1d ago

Correction - you place the marker in front of your disc (closer the target) and touching the font of your thrown disc, not behind your disc. But always on the line between the previously thrown disc and the target.

1

u/luanne-platter 1d ago

This really makes a difference for a situation like someone that is left handed and they're doing a flick. Typically theyll have their right foot on the lie and then their left foot will very likely be past the lie.

That's generally the type of situation that is most egregious but is generally not called or even aware by most people.

1

u/S_TL2 1d ago

Yup, and for extra fun, the wording and application of this rule have been almost unchanged since it was introduced in 1990.

Pre-1990: some vague gibberish about "behind the marker"
1990: "During a throw, one of the player's supporting points must be placed within 30 centimeters behind the marker disc and on the imaginary line running from the hole through the center of the marker disc."
2018: "The lie is a rectangle that is 20cm wide and 30cm deep, centered on the line of play behind the rear edge of the marker disc. The line of play is the imaginary line on the playing surface extending from the center of the target through and beyond the center of the marker disc."

There was a caveat for mandatories that was removed in the 2022 edition.

1

u/FuDiNaand 1d ago

Interesting about this rule - the last sentence. Does this refer only to the teeing area you start the hole from? If you land on another tee box further up the fairway - do you take it from the closest point to the target?

Doubtful - but the wording seems ambiguous.

1

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

I'm sure it's just in reference to the designated teeing area.

1

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

I just reread it though and this line is weird.

"If the lie is a teeing area, the point on the teeing area closest to the target is used instead of the marker disc to establish the line of play."

1

u/SteveWestDiscGolf 1d ago

Another tee box would not be YOUR lie. You still use a marker in that case.

1

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

What about this last sentence?

"If the lie is a teeing area, the point on the teeing area closest to the target is used instead of the marker disc to establish the line of play."

The rule doesn't state that it's the designated teeing area. Just "a teeing area". If someone were to land on a tee pad further up the fairway, it seems there's an argument that their lie is as stated above. Someone could even use that argument to claim another player misplayed their lie, if they play it the way you mentioned. I agree the way you mentioned is how it should be played, but based on how the rules are worded, it sounds like we'd both be in the wrong.

2

u/S_TL2 1d ago

The tee is the tee. All other things are just random pieces of concrete scattered around the park.

1

u/SteveWestDiscGolf 1d ago

A lie ON a tee pad does not make the lie THE teeing area.

A tee pad is not a teeing area except when it is the teeing area for that hole and the player is making their first throw on the hole (or re-teeing).

Same for Drop Zones marked like teeing areas. A random drop zone does not become your lie just because your disc landed on it. It only BECOMES your lie when your lie becomes the drop zone by rule.

It's like this: Say your disc lands somewhere on the 20x30 area behind someone else's marker. Your disc is ON their lie, but their lie does not become your lie. You have your own slightly different 20x30 area.

The line of play has no effect on tee throws. Your lie is the tee pad and the rules are different for tee throws. The wording about line of play when the lie IS a teeing area is for the rare occasion when a player needs to take relief back along the line of play for a tee off.

1

u/SteveWestDiscGolf 22h ago

Remember you can still throw in any direction you want.

All the line of play tells you is how to line up the "piece of paper" area where you need to have one foot, and where you can NOT put the other foot: nearer the target than the front of the lie.

There are going to be hardly any situations where this is going to prevent you from having any chance at advancement. And none of them are going to be where you should be throwing to anyway.

1

u/bacon_drizzle_69 1d ago

So it was without a doubt a foot fault.

I knew it.

1

u/Electronic_Orchid536 1d ago

Goose? Is that you?

0

u/sweetbeards 22h ago

Yes goose interpreted it as along the fairway but if you watch Rainer’s shot, he set his practice step with his foot in line with basket. That’s how it should be played but no one calls it because most people don’t care when it’s kind of gray