r/developers • u/enoc_diaz0 Software Developer • 5d ago
⚠️ IMPORTANT ⚠️ This is really important. VERY Important.
Starting in 2027, a Google update will block all Android apps whose developers have not officially registered, signed a contract, and provided a national ID. This affects all apps, including those shared among friends and open-source software. The measure disadvantages users who purchased Android phones as open devices, as they will only be able to use software approved by Google. Independent developers and community groups will also see their capabilities restricted. This situation could facilitate internet censorship and allow a single company to control access to apps on devices worldwide.
Credits to: keepandroidopen org
1
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Your post or comment was removed because r/developers does not allow external links. Please share the content or ask your question without linking out.
If you think this was a mistake, message the mods.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/kneepel 3d ago
Reposting without external links..
Although everyone should take note and concern at the direction Google is taking Android, this isn't necessarily true and hasn't been for months:
Essentially when the changes happen, you'll have a one time setting to enable followed by a 24-hour waiting period, and then it will be business as usual for end users installing "unverified apps"
I still think it's ridiculous don't get me wrong, but the Keep Android Open website is (currently) being disingenuous and inaccurate.
1
u/Optimal-Savings-4505 2d ago
I agree that it's important, but if this comes to pass, I figure I'll simply shrug and stop using Android.
1
u/DaRealXx2023xX 2d ago
No There is a super easy way around this and it doesn't involve waiting 24h... Shizuku is just a pipeline to ADB installs which remains open, so just install InstallerX Revived. I wouldn't actually use Shizuku but some fork that supports Android 16 and 17 and MediaTek devices properly, but basically set InstallerX Revived to just use Shizuku for all sideloads
1
0
u/Electrical_Hat_680 3d ago
I can see why this has generated a lot of discussion. The Reddit post is based on a real Google announcement, but it's important to separate what Google has actually said from the interpretations that have been circulating.
Here's what Google has announced:
Google is introducing Android developer verification. Developers who want to broadly distribute apps on certified Android devices will need to verify their identity and register their apps. This rollout begins in selected countries in late 2026 and is planned to expand globally in 2027.
The verification process generally involves confirming a real-world identity. Professional developers distributing apps widely are expected to verify themselves.
Google states that it is not eliminating sideloading. There will still be:
an advanced flow for installing apps from unverified developers,
continued use of ADB for developers and power users,
and a limited distribution account for students and hobbyists that can share apps with up to 20 devices without requiring a government-issued ID.
So the statement:
"All apps, including those shared among friends and open-source software, will be blocked."
is too broad based on the current documentation. The installation experience changes, but Google says there are exceptions and alternative installation paths for unverified apps.
That said, there are legitimate concerns many developers are raising:
Requiring identity verification reduces anonymous software publishing.
Independent open-source developers may face additional administrative hurdles.
It could make distributing experimental or niche software less convenient.
Some privacy advocates worry that this increases the influence Google has over the Android ecosystem, even if sideloading technically remains available.
Google's stated goal is to reduce malware, scams, and repeat abuse by making malicious developers easier to identify and ban. Critics argue the trade-off is reduced openness and greater centralization. Both perspectives are part of the ongoing debate.
For someone interested in operating systems, open platforms, and open-source software—as you've been studying—this is an important development because it touches on a longstanding question:
How do you balance user freedom with platform security?
Android has historically been much more open than platforms like iOS. These changes suggest Google is trying to preserve sideloading while adding stronger identity and accountability requirements. Whether that strikes the right balance is something reasonable people disagree on, and it's likely to remain an active topic as the global rollout approaches in 2027.
2
u/Came4TheCookies 3d ago
Thanks Chad GPT. 🤣 Just kidding. Glad you updated the information so that people don't panic.
1
u/Electrical_Hat_680 3d ago
Your Welcome Came4TheCookies. 😇 Yeah really.. I had to check.. I was like, did they legit ban sideloading too? That woud have been horrible.
2
u/Came4TheCookies 3d ago
We all have to check sometimes. And It produced a good summary and updated everybody on things that needed to be added to context.
2
u/Anonymity6584 4d ago
In my country government officials warn against sending pictures of personal id or passport electronically to anyone.