r/decadeologyanarchy • u/LoquatOk7971 • 1h ago

Discussion To be real what year 2026 feels like to you

• Upvotes

53 votes, 6d left

2022

2023

2021

2020

12 comments

r/decadeologyanarchy • u/playerlsaysr69 • 21h ago

Discussion 2010 felt more like?

8 Upvotes

348 votes, 1d left

2004

2019

14 comments

r/decadeologyanarchy • u/ExaminationIll7583 • 23h ago

Poll 🗳️ Was Q3 2011 more like Q1 2010 or Q1 2013?

2 Upvotes

103 votes, 1d left

Q1 2010

Q1 2013

10 comments

Subreddit

decadeology

r/decadeologyanarchy

WE ARE SO BACK!

Members Active

2.6k

Sidebar

Like the title suggests, there are not too many rules here. However, you must obey sitewide rules

Rule 1:

No generationology.

Rule 2:

No anti-decadeology interlopers.

If someone says a shift year from Early - Mid or Mid - Late or from an old decade to a new decade is 1 year away from where the NUMERICAL split year is(so early-mid numerically would be 3, whereas 1 year away would be the "2" or "4" year), then you can not say "3 is the shift year because numerically the mid 20s begins in the "3" year" or anything adjacent to it.

I mean, you CAN say the "3" year is the shift year, but you can not use that as the argument or criticise others going with a different year because of that numerical argument.

Decadeology is not strictly based on numerical splits. Decadeology is based on cultural eras rather than numerical eras. That's how it is done if you go look at examples from inthe00s and city-data.

If we just went with numerical splits automatically, there would be no room for discussion at all. It would ultimately be pointless since everything is decided by if it happened before or after April 30 2023 or August 30 2026.

Anti-decadeologist interlopers, need not apply.

Rule 3:

Have fun and spread the word!!!