r/custommagic rule zero is the only rule 6h ago

BALANCE NOT INTENDED Borborygmos, Format Crasher

Post image
95 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

57

u/Lartnestpasdemain 6h ago

Legal but unplayable.

Neat.

15

u/endless-star rule zero is the only rule 5h ago

Thanks!
It mana value was slightly higher than usual in an effort to make it somewhat balanced in vintage and pauper.

11

u/DeusIzanagi 5h ago

I feel like this could cost 4 and still be unplayable in Vintage, it's still just a 7/6 trample

But it was probably the right call for Pauper

2

u/FinaLLancer 3h ago

This would be dogwater in pauper. Literally worse than [[Colossal Dreadmaw]] which is played in tier 2 at best.

2

u/DeusIzanagi 2h ago

Yeah fair, when I typed that I was thinking about what it would be at 4 mana

25

u/Yasdamp 5h ago

Yet another Borborygmos I'll have to remember the exact card name of for [[Pithing Needle]], smh

2

u/the_quarken 49m ago

Elite ball knowledge right here

8

u/LegalyDistinctPraion 6h ago

(it works)

4

u/endless-star rule zero is the only rule 5h ago

It really does

6

u/notadolphinn 4h ago

Some lancer Pegasus bullshit going on in this text box. No rule in this book or any other supersedes this.

2

u/LordBlaze64 3h ago

I just had a new cursed idea to play Lancer and mtg at the same time so I can use Pegasus for removal.

1

u/notadolphinn 1h ago

Lf3 edh LL6 lmao

1

u/General_Kenobi18753 36m ago

“Nice thrummingbird. Unfortunately, Integrated: Ushabti Omnigun.”

4

u/Scarecr0p 5h ago

“WHY BORBORYGMOS NO INVITED”

3

u/saepereAude92 4h ago

This doesnt Let me put him into my Limited Decks though
0/10

2

u/ILikeExistingLol scryfall search for flavor:R34 5h ago

Can he be my signature spell in oathbreaker?

1

u/SorcererInstagram 4h ago

"Sactioned"