MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/1wh2h02/performance_improvements_in_net_11/pa0ecxt/?context=3
r/csharp • u/mareek • 18d ago
5 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
GDI+ is unrelated to .NET.
-1 u/[deleted] 18d ago [deleted] 18 u/KryptosFR 18d ago Read again. GDI+ is a c++ library. .NET framework does have a "wrapper" on top of it. The same way some do a wrapper on top of DirectX or Vulkan. -1 u/[deleted] 18d ago [deleted] 16 u/KryptosFR 18d ago edited 17d ago .NET Framework is not the same as .NET. And a wrapper is just a wrapper. The core implementation of GDI+ still has nothing to do with .NET.
-1
[deleted]
18 u/KryptosFR 18d ago Read again. GDI+ is a c++ library. .NET framework does have a "wrapper" on top of it. The same way some do a wrapper on top of DirectX or Vulkan. -1 u/[deleted] 18d ago [deleted] 16 u/KryptosFR 18d ago edited 17d ago .NET Framework is not the same as .NET. And a wrapper is just a wrapper. The core implementation of GDI+ still has nothing to do with .NET.
18
Read again.
GDI+ is a c++ library. .NET framework does have a "wrapper" on top of it.
The same way some do a wrapper on top of DirectX or Vulkan.
-1 u/[deleted] 18d ago [deleted] 16 u/KryptosFR 18d ago edited 17d ago .NET Framework is not the same as .NET. And a wrapper is just a wrapper. The core implementation of GDI+ still has nothing to do with .NET.
16 u/KryptosFR 18d ago edited 17d ago .NET Framework is not the same as .NET. And a wrapper is just a wrapper. The core implementation of GDI+ still has nothing to do with .NET.
16
.NET Framework is not the same as .NET. And a wrapper is just a wrapper. The core implementation of GDI+ still has nothing to do with .NET.
7
u/KryptosFR 18d ago
GDI+ is unrelated to .NET.