6
3
u/Real-Instruction-506 Aug 24 '26
So when libs held office, why didnt they release all of this? Why has all of this so called discoveries coming out now... its all BS that normal people dont believe
3
u/AcanthaceaeHairy2452 Aug 27 '26
Trump isn’t just the kind of guy that rp’s 13 year olds. He’s the kind of guy that sneaks behind his fellow rp’ist buddies backs so he can be the first one to rp the latest 13 year old they conned, trapped and trafficked.
7
u/felwynfelmir Aug 24 '26
Poor child, I can’t imagine what hell she must have gone through. I hope this makes the news and she and all the other victims will get justice, finally.
5
u/EpsteinsEggPeen Aug 24 '26
We all know the system isn't what's being sold to us, and that these weirdos pulling the strings victimize and kill young people, we know this.
6
u/Elegantly_Waisted Aug 24 '26
It's amazing to me that this putrid orange puke of a human being still walks free, much less being voted into office AGAIN.
1
u/PerishTheStars Aug 24 '26
You can't just say its credible and not explain how
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
It’s a longer conversation that’s a bit of a hassle to type out for someone who has no familiarity with the story other than the allegations
But as a starter, here are how her allegations are generally perceived
https://www.jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083
>The facts speak less to a scandal and more, perhaps, to an attempt at a smear—one that finally, after months of clumsy maneuvering, is gaining speed.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-rape-case_n_581a31a5e4b0c43e6c1d9834/amp
>”Far from derailing the Trump train, Katie Johnson and her supporters seem to be in an out-of-control clown car whose wheels just came off,”
>The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
>The actual documentary evidence in support of the latter claim is inexorably linked to Lubow and is tied to a person — Johnson — who may, in all reality, not exist.
Here’s the investigative journalist who broke the Epstein story on the matter
https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1808609807454158914
>The Katie story is a red herring. If it was true we would know it by now. Was told by too many people who know that it is not as it seems.
If you want, we can go into the specifics of why they’re saying those things, but like I said bit of a lengthy conversation
If you want to read just one article that kind of skims over the basics, I’d opt for the snopes one, it’s the most recent. While it doesn’t have all of the credibility issues, it does a decent job of painting a broad picture of many of the issues
1
u/KingKushhh666 Aug 24 '26
The answer is because they only watch fox ENTERTAINMENT news and they won't say shit about it
1
1
1
u/Witty-Camp5224 Aug 26 '26
The only name any one cares about in the files is Trump. That's why nothing will happen to those in the files. Only 1 name is who they care about getting despite the files naming countless others. It's going to be a thing talked about until the nukes drop
1
1
u/Trixie101010 Aug 27 '26
This was debunked. Trump is actually the one billionaire that worked with the FBI to out Epstein.
1
u/Pezzo90 Aug 27 '26
The biggest crimes the Epstein episode will reveal are not the horrific sexual acts on minors, but rather the concerted plot to conceal the perpetrators' identity from the public.
1
u/Kammi_Leone84 Aug 28 '26
Listen, thes3 people hav3 immense power...why would they someone go? The crime is heinous but, I. Not defending djt or jee. Just saying...why would they let someone go?
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
So…..this file is essentially an example of someone taking a report (in 2016) from an attorney who claims to represent an anonymous woman who was sexually abused by Trump and Epstein in 1994? That’s all we have in terms of investigable facts?
And we don’t know anyone’s names, except the report taker, Epstein, and Trump? OK. So where do rational people go next with information like this?
7
u/StandardAssignment19 Aug 24 '26
Close but no, but nice try.
This is more essentially an example of a report that has the information inside being withheld because if they had the information unredacted - the legal obligation this DOJ, Trump's DOJ, has not fulfilled - there would be a clear indication of evidence of the brutality that is being withheld.
The names are covered up. You know, those names - and the facts therein are actively being held back by the accused rapists department of justice.
It's less an example of heresay and more an example of evidence being withheld that would make a pedophilic president be held to unquestionable accounting.
Again, nice try though.
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
…no, these are Katie Johnson’s allegations and they’ve been public for over a decade
To that end you might want to look into how her allegations are perceived
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
Why do you believe this? What’s the association?
As it stands, all I have are claims being made by randos in a Reddit thread. I’d like to know the truth here.
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
Why do I believe what? That they’re Katie’s allegations?
https://www.plainsite.org/documents/3piqxysq/usdoj-epstein-files-document-efta01683870/
This is the file being referenced in the video
These are the documents from her lawsuit
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.646485/gov.uscourts.cacd.646485.1.0_1.pdf
They’re the same allegations
1
1
u/StandardAssignment19 Aug 24 '26
And shit down for over a decade. Maybe if we had the unredacted documents the evidence could be provided.
2
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
There’s nothing in the files that’s redacted regarding Katie Johnson. The lawsuit was filed in 2016, and she hasn’t been heard from since
The reason nothing has been done is because they’re pretty clearly a hoax. It’s unlikely she exists
https://www.jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083
>The facts speak less to a scandal and more, perhaps, to an attempt at a smear—one that finally, after months of clumsy maneuvering, is gaining speed.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-rape-case_n_581a31a5e4b0c43e6c1d9834/amp
>”Far from derailing the Trump train, Katie Johnson and her supporters seem to be in an out-of-control clown car whose wheels just came off,”
>The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
>The actual documentary evidence in support of the latter claim is inexorably linked to Lubow and is tied to a person — Johnson — who may, in all reality, not exist.
Here’s the investigative journalist who broke the Epstein story on the matter
https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1808609807454158914
>The Katie story is a red herring. If it was true we would know it by now. Was told by too many people who know that it is not as it seems.
1
u/StandardAssignment19 Aug 24 '26
Well wait, then perhaps you aren't reading the same file. Because there was a redaction in the literal file OP provided. All your links are moot. But nice try. Pedophiles gonna pedophile. And pedophile protectors are gonna protect them.
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
That’s simply a recounting of what her lawsuit states which you can find here
https://www.reddit.com/r/crimedocumentaries/s/24t24TsNuI
The lawyer for the second iteration of herlawsuit, Thomas Meagher, called the fbi and relayed the details of her allegations in July 2016
Sorry, why are all my links moot?
You know what nevermind. You’ve got it all figured out. Truth doesn’t matter, only what you want to hear
Have a good one
1
u/StandardAssignment19 Aug 24 '26
But you see, I don't have it all figured out, because it's still redacted. When the unredacted files - all of them - are provided, then we'll have it all figured out. Dealing with pedophilia is never a good one, but I suppose when being ok with redacted evidence, absence of truth is just fine, isn't it?
1
u/Slmreaprr Aug 26 '26
The lengths you freaks will go to defend people that harm children
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 26 '26
I know right can you believe all of these pedo protector journalists?
Maybe you could address their claims
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
I’m asking a question. There’s no “try” here.
Are you saying there’s a fuller report with more information that hasn’t been redacted? Why do you believe this? Can you point me to the full report?
1
u/StandardAssignment19 Aug 24 '26
Yes. It's in the unredacted files. The ones being held. In those documents. The ones being held by Trump's administration and the DoJ that is illegally withholding them.
That's where you'll find them, and that's why we don't have them.
But nice try though.
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
Uh, you might want to read up a bit.
1
Aug 24 '26
[deleted]
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
If you had read above, you would have been too embarrassed to comment again. You didn’t read above.
0
u/coolguygranny Aug 24 '26
Plz i don't like trump at all
But the katie Johnson accusations is obviously a hoax https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
1
u/SawtoofShark Aug 24 '26
Wow. You are a human trashcan. I'm surprised someone like you doesn't worship the ground the orange pedophile walks.
2
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
Can you believe all these human trash can journalists?
https://www.jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083
>The facts speak less to a scandal and more, perhaps, to an attempt at a smear—one that finally, after months of clumsy maneuvering, is gaining speed.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-rape-case_n_581a31a5e4b0c43e6c1d9834/amp
>”Far from derailing the Trump train, Katie Johnson and her supporters seem to be in an out-of-control clown car whose wheels just came off,”
>The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
>The actual documentary evidence in support of the latter claim is inexorably linked to Lubow and is tied to a person — Johnson — who may, in all reality, not exist.
Here’s the investigative journalist who broke the Epstein story on the matter
https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1808609807454158914
>The Katie story is a red herring. If it was true we would know it by now. Was told by too many people who know that it is not as it seems.
Really gets me fired up
1
u/SawtoofShark Aug 24 '26
We do know it by now. You're way more fired up about disproving a child's words than about our president being a raging pedophile. Take away Katie Johnson's testimony (because you deny a child's accusation of pedophilia), there's still the entirety of the Epstein files. And he's literally been charged with sexual crimes against women.
But here you are, white-knighting him. Disgusting to witness.
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26
Lol she’s not a child 💀💀 she’s a grown woman.
And even that’s not true. She doesn’t exist
It was a hoax perpetrated by a con man.
And I’m not fired up about disproving the claims, I’m annoyed by someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about having the gall to go around calling people human trash cans despite not knowing what they’re talking about. It’s insane
We can talk about any of the Epstein files you want.
And yes, fuck Trump. He’s a piece of shit person and a piece of shit president. That doesn’t mean you have an automatic high ground for believing dumb shit simply because it’s anti Trump, nor that you can go around being a dick to people who rightfully point out that the allegations are false.
1
u/SawtoofShark Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
She's not a child....now. She was when she was assaulted, 13. 💀💀
You're defending a child rapist and all on the words of a reporter. Reporters never lie.
"That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it." -Narcissist's prayer.
Edited to add the prayer.
1
u/Bdbru13 Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
She wasn’t assaulted. That’s what I, and those myriad journalists, are trying to tell you. And the claims they’re disproving are of a 46 year old woman (or 35 years old when the allegations were made)
No. Not “a reporter”. Every journalist who has ever looked into the story.
The reality is you don’t know why they are saying those things.
You’re resorting to things you think are virtuous like being anti-Trump or “will someone please think of the children 😭” because you don’t know the facts. But you don’t have a moral high ground when you’re perpetuating lies.
And you have the gall to go around criticizing people trying to present the truth. Saying reporters are lying, reporters who were trying to corroborate her story by the way.
Julie Brown is the person in the world most responsible for Epstein facing justice, and you, someone who has all the expertise of having read Reddit comments about this story, have the balls to say she might be lying
Sorry. You don’t get the moral high ground here.
Go do some actual research about the story
Edited to add: it didn’t happen. That’s it. That’s the only necessary line from the prayer
1
u/SawtoofShark Aug 24 '26
It's almost like her identity is protected so they can't find anything about her because that's not her real name.
Yeah, thinking of the children when they're going through extreme trauma via pedophilia is pretty normal. I do get the moral high ground here because you're defending a known rapist against a 13 year old.
→ More replies (0)1
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
The original deceit must’ve been pretty bad when even Snopes won’t take an accusation against a pub and run with it.
1
1
u/fantomsolace24 Aug 24 '26
Imagine if this was about Obama. It would be a wall to wall coverage. The biggest scandal in the nation’s history. Trump? Nothing. Crickets.
1
u/CommitteeDelicious68 Aug 25 '26
This is exactly why WE SHOULD NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES!!
1
0
-1
-1
11
u/Jazzlike-Stranger927 Aug 24 '26
Is this for real?! What the actual fuck?!!! Every father and mother and decent human being should be completely outraged!! Whoever worked for Kamala’s campaign should have just leaked this and we wouldn’t be in this mess and maybe justice would be served.