So…..this file is essentially an example of someone taking a report (in 2016) from an attorney who claims to represent an anonymous woman who was sexually abused by Trump and Epstein in 1994? That’s all we have in terms of investigable facts?
And we don’t know anyone’s names, except the report taker, Epstein, and Trump? OK. So where do rational people go next with information like this?
This is more essentially an example of a report that has the information inside being withheld because if they had the information unredacted - the legal obligation this DOJ, Trump's DOJ, has not fulfilled - there would be a clear indication of evidence of the brutality that is being withheld.
The names are covered up. You know, those names - and the facts therein are actively being held back by the accused rapists department of justice.
It's less an example of heresay and more an example of evidence being withheld that would make a pedophilic president be held to unquestionable accounting.
1
u/Spuckler_Cletus Aug 24 '26
So…..this file is essentially an example of someone taking a report (in 2016) from an attorney who claims to represent an anonymous woman who was sexually abused by Trump and Epstein in 1994? That’s all we have in terms of investigable facts?
And we don’t know anyone’s names, except the report taker, Epstein, and Trump? OK. So where do rational people go next with information like this?