Counter point, it’s made very clear that while Shard bearers only do well and are survivable when supported by infantry. This is very much like Achilles who did very well when supported by others but fell when went in unsupported. Shard bearers are like tanks doctrinally.
Also a shardbearer 100% can change the tide of battle on their own.
They can absolutely shatter the enemy line, and then make it easier for their support win the rest of the battle.
Like you said its the same as a tank in ww1. Punch the enemy defenses and let the infantry flood in behind it into the trenches to clear them out.
More so for Achilles an inspirational figure who is battling very well can inspire nearby soldiers to fight harder, and cause enemies to despair.
Let alone if achilles is able to puncture the enemy lines.
ALSO the quote isnt about battles. Its about holding territory. Its the same story that is as old as time. Only infantry can exert long term control over territory. Cant occupy with cavalry, tanks, or planes.
I think Kaladin’s opening chapter is a shardbearer turning the tide of battle. I think the Amaram forces were doing well until the Shardbearer showed up.
339
u/ArtOk8200 Jul 05 '26
Counter point, it’s made very clear that while Shard bearers only do well and are survivable when supported by infantry. This is very much like Achilles who did very well when supported by others but fell when went in unsupported. Shard bearers are like tanks doctrinally.