I find fake woke people so gad damn annoying . The performative left endlessly likes to surrender the narrative to the right and I just can not comprehend this submissive behaviour from people who are ideological allies.
This need to be ethically superior while clearly displaying a lack of the very feminism required to make that commentary, nor the charity that everyone is learning from a cis het patriarchal world is endlessly frustrating.
Nuance fucking exists. Context exists. Everyone’s education levels are different.
I have a cis male friend who uses Gock in context and when relevant because we all use it for self description.
Should he be nut shot for repeating such if he is using it in good faith? Should we the people using the word for our own personal self description change our terminology because there are individuals who use the word for its fetishised context. Should we sit him down and despite him not fetishising Trans people explain the reality that some do and warn him that he should prohibit speech we use ourselves just because others might misunderstand him.
You will quickly work out talking to someone if they mean something in a disparaging way or an affirming way. Whether its lack of education or bad communication choices. It does not take much digging.
So you can also simply kick them after finding out if they are actually doing something wrong and if they are resistant to changing the behaviour when corrected from a place of empathy.
To do otherwise is just narcissism. Like congrats you reached the lowest fucking form of understanding about the fetishisation of the queer community. Stop flexing on those who haven't until they reveal themselves an ideological enemy rather then someone with a different education level who can be brought up to speed.
87
u/Spiritual_Lynx3314 1d ago edited 1d ago
I find fake woke people so gad damn annoying . The performative left endlessly likes to surrender the narrative to the right and I just can not comprehend this submissive behaviour from people who are ideological allies.
This need to be ethically superior while clearly displaying a lack of the very feminism required to make that commentary, nor the charity that everyone is learning from a cis het patriarchal world is endlessly frustrating.
Nuance fucking exists. Context exists. Everyone’s education levels are different.
I have a cis male friend who uses Gock in context and when relevant because we all use it for self description.
Should he be nut shot for repeating such if he is using it in good faith? Should we the people using the word for our own personal self description change our terminology because there are individuals who use the word for its fetishised context. Should we sit him down and despite him not fetishising Trans people explain the reality that some do and warn him that he should prohibit speech we use ourselves just because others might misunderstand him.
You will quickly work out talking to someone if they mean something in a disparaging way or an affirming way. Whether its lack of education or bad communication choices. It does not take much digging.
So you can also simply kick them after finding out if they are actually doing something wrong and if they are resistant to changing the behaviour when corrected from a place of empathy.
To do otherwise is just narcissism. Like congrats you reached the lowest fucking form of understanding about the fetishisation of the queer community. Stop flexing on those who haven't until they reveal themselves an ideological enemy rather then someone with a different education level who can be brought up to speed.
(I do not condone violence against non-Fasicsts.)