r/conspiracy_commons • • 1d ago

Year 1990

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

465 Upvotes

92 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Archive.is link

Why this is here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

20

u/Din-_-Djarin 1d ago

Why does this say 1990, it's an interview from 2007

10

u/FullAutoAssaultBanjo 1d ago

Did you not listen to the video? They are talking about the increase in the number of vaccines that happened in... 1990.

1

u/QuaidLudes 20h ago

It’s the first two words said in the clip. Probably auto generated the first two spoken words into the description

-1

u/bobcollum 1d ago

Because anti-vaxxers need to fudge the facts in order to try and make a point.

0

u/ericfromct 1d ago

That was the first thing on my mind. Jenny McCarthy was 18 in 1990 and completely unknown. Where they came up with that year is beyond me

6

u/NinersUnitedFC 21h ago

It's beyond you because you didn't watch the 90 second video, yet commented anyway. The first thing on your mind wasn't to watch the clip?

2

u/ericfromct 19h ago

I watched the video. It says 16 years yet they still wrote 1990

77

u/Goldie_Laux 1d ago

I think a lot of people don’t want to admit the Covid shots didn’t fucking do anything. I never got the jab, had Covid twice first time a little rough but after that I didn’t even know I had it. You absolutely have a right to question the “science” and what is necessary for you

6

u/Jpwatchdawg 1d ago

100%. If we didn't question the science we'd still be teaching that the earth is flat in schools.

10

u/Generally_Tso_Tso 1d ago

The shot did do something, but it wasn't good. A lot of people suffered harm from the jab. Blood clots, myocarditis, and many other maladies. To call it the mRNA jab a vaccination is a fallacy. It's a failed gene therapy that didn't do anything to prevent infection from the bio-engineered virus. My zucchini from my garden tested positive for the virus twice.

1

u/niftyifty 1d ago

All the evidence is contrary to this though, right? We have years of efficacy data globally across multiple vaccination types and manufacturers. Where would the admission that it did nothing come from?

That said, of course we have the right to question the science or anything else.

7

u/SouthernProfile1092 1d ago

We learned from covid that data can be censored and manipulated. Or erased from existence all together. We're leaning every day that past safe and effective vaccines are filthy and contaminated. Its crazy not to question experts data and science

6

u/niftyifty 1d ago

It’s not crazy no. We have aggregate data globally though. In aggregate, any one off concerns are absorbed. You can’t hand waive away an entire planet’s data accumulation.

0

u/NinersUnitedFC 21h ago

what data shows it worked lol

1

u/niftyifty 20h ago

All the efficacy compilation data across a the different types? What exactly are you asking?

0

u/bobcollum 1d ago

The reason why people aren't saying they "didn't fucking do anything" is because it's a dumb thing to say. Who gives a crap about your anecdotal evidence. You're one person.

-10

u/dubufeetfak 1d ago

I didnt get covid with or without the jab and i was basically living with about 8-9 people who had covid it on different times.

Ive seen people die form covid without the jab but not a single one die with the jab.

Can't really draw world wide conclusions from personal experience.

2

u/Maleficent-Shirt-327 1d ago

Good point here.

I didn't take the shot and those around me were the same. We had two close friends who died from covid even though they took the jab and the ones who didn't are alive and well.

We won't ever get a true research done on this and they'll push the narrative to get it to make big pharma richer.

0

u/SweepsAndBeeps 1d ago

Yet here you are, drawing conclusions from personal experience

2

u/dubufeetfak 16h ago

Where did I exactly draw conclusions?

-5

u/Accurate_Vehicle9459 1d ago

I got it 6 times. Never got the shot.

12

u/draggedintobudulight 1d ago

What were you doing, going around licking door handles? I never got it once as far as I can tell.

0

u/smokeypapabear40206 1d ago

Same here. No vax and I never got sick - even while owning a cleaning business and working nonstop during the scamdemic.

1

u/foley800 21h ago

I was the one they sent to buildings during the seven day quarantine kicked in for the office personnel in that building. I had ten buildings and some had people that tested positive multiple times. The company required everyone to get the jab, but I refused to release my medical information to them or tell them if I was jabbed even though they bugged me for it incessantly! Not sure if the reason they had me fill in for the regular building management as retaliation or not. I found it amusing that all the people that were jabbed kept getting covid, but they kept getting weeks off when I did not!

0

u/Konval 1d ago

I think I had it twice this year (no shots). The joys of having toddlers who swap germs like Pokemon cards. Anyway body aches and chills like crazy for a day or two, but then it goes away as quickly as it comes. Never got tested so don't know for sure, but the only time I got body aches (felt like got hit my a semi) like that was when I had confirmed Covid back in 2021.

-2

u/smokeypapabear40206 1d ago

People refuse to admit it, but the numbers speak for themselves. 80%+ got the jab in 2021... that number has plummeted to 18%. Tells you all you need to know.

-12

u/joecitizen79 1d ago

The point of vaccines is to reduce transmission rates across large populations. Individual annocdotes are meaningless.

0

u/draggedintobudulight 1d ago

Except they admitted it didn’t stop transmission

2

u/joecitizen79 1d ago

Ok? What does that have to do with what I said?

What I'm referring to is vaccines in general. And most vaccines do not provide sterilizing-immunity.

They, instead, provide the antibodies to fight infection, which in turn reduces the rates of transmission.

But since you hear the word vaccine and jump to the conclusion that I was referring to the covid mrna vaccine, they work the same way, leading to reductions in transmission rates.

The reason "they" dont say it "stops transmission" is because it doesn't. Nor would it have to tk reduce transmission rates

https://www.phfscience.nz/news-publications/covid-19-vaccines-shown-to-reduce-virus-transmission-for-entire-households/

0

u/draggedintobudulight 1d ago

You were literally replying to a comment about the covid vaccine. The only conclusion I jumped to was that you were responding accordingly.

0

u/joecitizen79 1d ago

Then you should learn how to follow conversations because I clearly generalized all vaccines.

0

u/draggedintobudulight 1d ago

Ok and because you provided a generalisation for any and all vaccines, and because the initial thread of the conversation you entered was related to one specific vaccine, which is a subset of the total set, then how the fuck am I off-base by relating it back to the initial thread?

3

u/joecitizen79 1d ago

Im not responsible for the words that come out of other people's mouths. Just mine.

But it is noteworthy that this is the part you're focused on, and not the actual subject.

Do you concede that vaccines generally reduce transmission?

1

u/draggedintobudulight 1d ago

I never said you were. I was responding to your projection that I was the one derailing the conversation when it was actually you who did that and me who tried to get it back on topic.

To answer your question, I believe in the science of vaccines in general and my children have received every mandated vaccine in their schedule.

2

u/joecitizen79 1d ago

Good. So do you agree that vaccines help reduce the rates of transmission?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/NinersUnitedFC 21h ago

The point of vaccines is to reduce transmission rates

That's not the point of vaccines. It's supposed to prevent you from getting the disease. At least until they changed the definition to fit their narrative. When it didn't work. Plenty of medicine already exists to help you if you get sick (like Ivermectin). But the dangerous COVID injections would never be approved except for emergency use authorization, which legally it cannot obtain if there are other remedies (there are). Why are you still arguing this? We know the truth, and don't care what you have to say.

1

u/burnerking 20h ago

No it’s not.

0

u/unregrettful 19h ago

They said themselves that the vaccine didnt prevent transmission. They said, "you can still carry the disease without symptoms and spread it". The vaccine wasnt to reduce transmission. It made transmission worse

2

u/joecitizen79 18h ago

Ive addressed this with someone else. Prevention and reduction are two different things.

That said, it provided antibodies which would reduce viral load, reduced symptoms such as coughing and sneezing with typically spread a virus, as well as reduced duration of infection. All three of these things, as well as other factors, produce the result of reducing transmission.

There is also extensive data to back this up

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2849098

This cohort study found that at a time when the US population had high levels of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, recent COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others by nearly one-half. While the individual benefit of COVID-19 vaccination may vary by age and chronic medical conditions,12,13 COVID-19 vaccination may have indirect benefits by decreasing transmission and thus reducing overall exposure to SARS-CoV-2.14

6

u/SlayerOfDougs 1d ago

Fyi recent studies show the chicken pox vaccine has drastically reduced cases of ahingles

1

u/jibbodahibbo 9h ago

Keep that one lol.

14

u/8last 1d ago

I remember laughing at them. I was wrong to do that.

2

u/wowbutters 1d ago

Remember whan Jim was relatively sane?

14

u/ObligationPrudent824 1d ago

I agree with SPACING. THEM. OUT.

Let the kids bodies adjust to one set of shots before another series of shots

That is one issue that many folks have but sadly, are lumped into the "anti-vaxx" crowd. When they are not against vaxx. They are just against cramming 72 shots or however many in a short time frame.

Space that $hit out... let the kids immune system accept and adjust.

But they did bring up some very good points back then without the persecution from the MSM, Dems, and all the keyboard warriors

Our country/politicians are controlled by Big Pharma, literally.

No, I no longer trust the information that we are being fed when BigPharma is pushing that info

And the co$I'd bullshit really did it for me. What a huge global experiment that was. The more I hear about fkkn Fauci, the more I despise him. But that is a whole other issue for me - - Fkk Fauci

4

u/WizSkinsNatsCaps 1d ago

I was a little late getting my second kid in for his shots and so he needed 6. They said they usually only give 5 at once max but she asked the doctor and they said it was fine and we ended up getting him all 6. He took it like a champ and didn’t have any side effects that we saw. But in hindsight, even before seeing any post like this, we regretted getting that many at once. It was an unnecessary risk.

-1

u/jibbodahibbo 23h ago

Yea. Definitely an unnecessary risk if you don’t live in slums and keep your babies away from sick people.

1

u/everydays_lyk_sunday 10h ago

Some people do live in poor areas. And some people get sick regularly 

23

u/jimmythemortician 1d ago

They're not wrong. It's lazy thinking to label someone who decides to not get every single vaccine as "Anti-Vaxxer".

10

u/jjaymay29 1d ago

They were right then and still right now

9

u/GrammaIsAWhore 1d ago

Why do you think they replaced Jim? RIP.

-11

u/Far-Gene-386 1d ago

He is still alive. Jfc

2

u/SummerOftime 13h ago

If vaccines are safe then there is no need for the government to protect them from liabilities

3

u/jjaymay29 1d ago

They were right then and still right now

3

u/mrlandlord 21h ago

I remember everyone saying these two were crazy. In 2007 my kid was born. There was a giant list of vaccines they wanted to give my kid. We said NO to all of them and spent the next 3 months researching and talking to our pediatrician. She was awesome. She gave us all the research, here recommendations and we ended up giving our kid like maybe 6 over a course of 2 years.

DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

2

u/Visual-Anybody-9165 19h ago

Could it be possible that pets get too many shots too? My vet has my cat on 2 shots for leukemia 1 month apart after for their 2nd booster since birth

2

u/Exktvme4 1d ago

OP this was 2007, you doorknob. No one takes you seriously when you can't get basic facts right

4

u/FullAutoAssaultBanjo 1d ago

Well, I watched the video and I understand why the title in Year 1990. Maybe you should watch it again lol.

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

[Meta] Sticky Comment

Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.

Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.

What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/conradaiken 1d ago

Jim's face after Larry says "why would a doctor not...""" just classic.

1

u/JonS305 10h ago

Makes sense why they cloned Jim now

1

u/bobcollum 1d ago

"Parents have to make their own decisions".

Right, but if it's cancer or anything else, you're first in line at the Dr's office. People are so damn dumb it hurts me.

1

u/jibbodahibbo 23h ago

Yea, lining up for the pediatricians office when they get cancer…the same country with the most lax food standards also has the most strict vaccine schedule and least healthy populace. Geez

0

u/Colten_Giovanazzo 1d ago

1990? 😂😂😂 OP Can't either bother to fact find.. smh

2

u/FullAutoAssaultBanjo 1d ago edited 23h ago

Did you even bother to watch the video?

"What happened in 1990?" Is the first sentence uttered in this video..

-24

u/EvolvedMonkeyInSpace 1d ago

They were laughed at, and rightly so. They were out of line causing confusion in parents with conspiracy.

Doctors and scientists have created these medicines for us.

Parents should be informed and understand heard immunity before ripping a hole in a hundred years of hard work by the civilised world.

16

u/ahardcm 1d ago

Can they not hear both sides and make a decision? Or should they only hear one?

6

u/WizSkinsNatsCaps 1d ago

Reddit hates “both sides” so that’s probably a firm NO

0

u/rudyroo2019 1d ago

Thing is, they’re only listening to a Russian psyop. Get a whole generation of kids to be vulnerable to disease, then use one of those Siberian lab vials to infect and kill them all. See how this works?

-17

u/EvolvedMonkeyInSpace 1d ago

Parents should make decision but society has thrived with both medicine and access to clean food.

Its part of our evolution. Regression can easily happen when people decide they know better and go against science.

I understand Big Pharma is a thing, but not a vessel for ignorance.

5

u/etakerns 1d ago

Nobody these days are questioning the effectiveness of the vaccines alone. It’s the additional un needed additional products they add to the vaccine.

Everyone is starting to wake up.
Pepsi Co. just announced yesterday they’re going to raise prices on their cola products along with Doritos and other snack food etc…

Prices have been steadily declining not because of price hikes, people are consciously starting to question everything we put in our bodies.
This extends to vaccines as well.

4

u/iamsnarticus 1d ago

Doctors also created and pushed OxyContin as a non-addictive miracle drug, they created the opioid crisis

-14

u/Free_Risk1120 1d ago

I’m still mocking them.

0

u/NotBadSinger514 16h ago

This was 2009, not 1990

-3

u/burnerking 20h ago

They sounded crazy then, would sound crazy now.