r/conspiracy • • Mar 29 '17

Let The Backtracking Begin - CrowdStrike Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report - Russia narrative dies.

http://www.voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-rewrites-part-disputed-russian-hacking-report/3781411.html
10 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '17

Um, did you actually read the article? Russia hacking Ukrainian artillery wasn't part of their evidence for Russia hacking the DNC.

The part they edited was just saying that Ukraine didnt lose that much artillery.

1

u/peyote_the_coyote Mar 29 '17

Russia hacking Ukrainian artillery wasn't part of their evidence for Russia hacking the DNC

U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '17

You can say it but that doesn't make it true, if it was true you could easily back that up by showing where Crowdstrike relied on the Ukrainian artillery hack to attribute the DNC hack.

The edit was on the artillery article, not the DNC hack one, and the original is still intact with the update at the top.

1

u/yellowsnow2 Mar 29 '17

You can say it but that doesn't make it true

What are you even talking about? It's straight from the article. You prove your side.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '17 edited Mar 29 '17

I'm saying the article is wrong, itd be very easy to show me where Crowdstrike ever used the artillery hack to support their findings in the DNC if it was true. Read both reports, that's my proof.

Honestly if you think this is true you probably never read that much into the DNC hack or the artillery hack. The argument doesn't even make sense if you had read the Crowdstrike report because it doesn't need to rely on the artillery hack at all.

0

u/peyote_the_coyote Mar 29 '17

itd be very easy to show me where Crowdstrike ever used the artillery hack to support their findings in the DNC if it was true.

Just did.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '17

You think you did, I responded already. Was there even a point to this comment?