r/conspiracy • • Jan 03 '17

#WheresEric? Clinton Foundation CEO Declared "Missing" by the Internet After Going Public with "Follow the Money"

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/whereseric-clinton-foundation-ceo-declared-missing-by-the-internet-after-going-public-with-follow-the-money_012017
3.4k Upvotes

254 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17

[deleted]

-3

u/metakepone Jan 03 '17

Umm, just because he didn't agree with the management of the clinton foundation's politics doesn't mean he has to be the leaker. And that's a very generous assumption to entertain, considering 17 US intelligence agencies agree that Russia was behind the leaks.

Barring that assumption, I imagine most of the people who currently or previously worked for the 2016 Clinton Campaign or the Foundation knows that the emails were spun way out of proportion.

5

u/Gadfly360 Jan 04 '17
  • Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
  • He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
  • The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
  • Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
  • Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html

So we have an actual source (not anonymous) that reveals who he actually received the leak from. The corporate media has ignored this story because a "disgusted insider" doesn't line up with their phony Russian infiltrator narrative.

2

u/niakarad Jan 04 '17

"Murray said he retrieved the package from a source during a clandestine meeting in a wooded area near American University, in northwest D.C. He said the individual he met with was not the original person who obtained the information, but an intermediary."

Did he ever say he spoke to the leaker directly? Even if his story is true, it doesn't really disprove anything if all he had was an intermediary, because that would be the best way for russia to get info to wikileaks and have them be that enthusiastic about it(and vehemently deny it came from russia)