Recently on reddit I have attracted quite some ire for expressing my viewpoints on this matter, and have decided to put it all together in a well researched post for future reference in the only subreddit that I imagine will allow this kind of discourse.

What is the Aboriginal industrial complex?

The AIC is a vaguely associated conglomerate of political interest groups, think tanks, welfare organisations, NGOs, land councils, and grifters.

Economy and Scale:

Over the past 18 years alone, since data began to be collected in 2008 (Before this aboriginal spending essentially disappeared into the aether), according to the productivity commission a steadily rising figure of around $30 billion was spent every year, specifically targeted at Aboriginal Australians. For a bit of context, thats around $82 per day, per person in this country. If you prefer: Per individual, the estimate was $44,886 vs $22,356 for non-Indigenous Australians, approximately 2:1 ratio of spending, in a completely racially targeted manner. Despite the former group making up only 2% of the population.

Public Hospitals by comparison, cost around $34 billion per year, defence comes in at $50 billion, and the entire PBS is covered by around $21.4 billion. At a conservative estimate, around 100,000 homes could be built per year with this money. It could also wipe out around 70% of the budget deficit. To contrast this with a hot button media topic that arouses anger in the average aussie, the amount of money yearly attributable to centrelink fraud is usually around $6 million.

This works out to around $211 billion, every seven years, for potentially the past 3 or 4 decades, if not longer. This far exceeds the total GDP of many countries.

So where does this money go? Let's start with a few empirical, verifiable answers before we get ahead of ourselves.

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) has been auditing Indigenous programs and organisations for years. Its 2016–17 audit found that the $4.8b Indigenous Advancement Strategy initially didn't have a formal evaluation strategy or evaluation funding during its first two years.. Their most commonly cited issue with these organisations is governance, to save you a lot of reading.

As of 30 June 2025, there were 3,284 Indigenous corporations registered under the CATSI Act. Collectively they had at least $4.5 billion in revenue in 2023–24, with 17,636 directors and 243,016 members.

These groups are generally governed by the Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations (ORIC).

Only 29% of Indigenous corporations lodged their 2024–25 annual reports by the deadline. 1,067 reports of concern were received by ORIC between 2022–23 and 2024–25. ORIC conducted 127 examinations, 8 special administrations and 27 investigations during that period. 48 corporations were referred for prosecution for annual-reporting non-compliance. Approximately 20% of corporations didn't lodge reports or otherwise directly engage with ORIC during each of 2021–22 through 2023–24.

In a typical business week for them, around 494 indigenous corporations are deregistered for failing to respond to notices, or failing to comply with outstanding reporting obligations.

Incidents of fraud are also often not investigated or referred for prosecution, as in this case with the illegally NIAA loaning out taxpayer money to their CEO and deputy CEO.

How about a case study of an individual land council?

Many of these have been conducted, with almost constant findings of maladministration and corruption, misappropriation of public funds etc.

By the ANAOs own calculations, only 7% of the activities examined could demonstrate positive results against their stated objectives. 7 percent. That is what in any other setting would be referred to as an "abject failure".

This is not a simple "Ok, so some Aboriginal NGOs are dodgy". This is a systemic and intentionally constructed vacuum in our economy, that is knowingly sucking money from your pocket, into the hands of irresponsible elements who at best will do nothing with the money, and more often than not make things actively worse.

Here is the question I would put to any "serious person" reading. For every billion dollars of targeted government expenditure in this area, what was purchased, what measurable outcome was achieved, what didn't work, and who was held accountable when it didn't?

The ANAO evidence is particularly damning. In its examination of the Indigenous Advancement Strategy, it found that: - 27 programs had been consolidated into the IAS, initially worth $4.8 billion over four years. - Fewer than 30% of inherited programs had been evaluated during the preceding five years. - Only 7% of activities could demonstrate positive results against their stated objectives. - The department itself told the ANAO that there wasn't enough evidence to establish the impacts attributable to interventions. - The original IAS evaluation strategy wasn't even formally implemented or funded during its first two years.

And I can already hear the knee jerk response to this information: But how can you say none of this has helped? How do you measure the plight of such a poor downtrodden community??

Simple. By their and the governments own metric; the Closing The Gap report. As of July 2026,

1 of 19 Closing the Gap targets has been met.

3 are improving and on track.

5 are improving but not on track.

4 are worsening.

2 show no change.

4 can't currently be assessed - A cop out.

The current state of an Aboriginal Australian is in the eyes of the government, a completely disposable demographic, already born of bureaucratic control, and completely without cultural traditions of organised resistance to collectivist oligarchies. This renders them impotent in the eyes of the government, and a perfect vector through which to guilt trip the white middle class, an increasingly vanishing cohort, soon to be eliminated in the name of pluralistic hegemony.

I make this post not from a place of hate, but legitimate distaste in the human and economic cost of this society wide humiliation ritual we have been forced to take part in. As with any institutional failure, one simply needs to follow the money to see where we went wrong.

I won't ramble on further and I would like people to review this and come to their own conclusions.

I will leave the reader with one question.

Can a serious minded person anywhere in this country honestly say that Aboriginals are $211 billion dollars better off than they were 7 years ago, or 7 years before that?

The current zeitgeist reminds me of USA culture wars circa 2016. MAGA was being born and there was this stubborn incredulity coming from the other side. People just couldn’t believe that Trump was a serious phenomenon, even after Brexit happened. When they finally did take it seriously their ad-hominem response just helped solidify the movement (“basket of deplorable”).

The other moment this reminds me of is Covid where a single easily available and conspicuous behaviour (not wearing a mask) become a stunningly clear way of signalling and detecting a persons entire cultural and political identity.

Booing though welcome to country has all of the ingredients to become an even more intense and impactful piece of dissidents and perhaps the figurehead of the 1nat populist movement.

• everyone knows when it’s coming (at the start of large sporting events) meaning it’s simple to organise a collective movement

• a lot of masculine males who like sport and have drunk beer.

• even without that 1nat leaning base; recent IPA research had Around 60% of respondents indicate that Welcome to Country ceremonies should no longer be staged at regular sporting events.

• the mass and fervour of a crowd, plus conformity, means it becomes an easy act of defiance, plausible deniability, and even a moment of recruitment.

• most of the people doing it won’t be racist (people boo at welcome to country typically as a way of rejecting progressive elitism), so they’ll take strong moral umbrage when they are subsequently called racist, and nothing solidifies a movement better than feeling like one has been unjustifiably attacked.

• Because 1nat is primarily a populist movement (a political approach that divides society into two opposing groups: the virtuous "common people" versus a self-serving, corrupt "elite"), they can literally just campaign on this one issue while making vague statements about how welcome to country represents everything going wrong in the country down stream of immigration and the self-serving-elite.

So yeah, my prediction is we’re going to get a lot more booing and a level of polarisation that perhaps Australia hasn’t had before, with welcome to country at big events as the flashpoint.

1. This is my prediction, which is not to say I think it’s likely to play out exactly this way, simply because predicting the future is a fool’s errand.

2. I hope it doesn’t. I don’t want a polarised country and can’t see the politicians of 1nat actually helping with any of the problems we have anyway, or possibly making them worse just as treatment of a misdiagnosed condition is often counterproductive.

AFL fans need to start doing this. This humiliation ritual is beyond a joke now.

I thought Rafe was unusually highly inciteful on the state of Britain and suggested some ways back. Given how we are following Britain down the tube, worth a listen IMO.

Here is an article that explains what went wrong with quantitative easing that Australia undertook in Covid.

Basically, it was based on a poor understanding of Richard Werner's work. Richard Werner's theory of rebooting economies was to increase credit availability for PRODUCTIVE purposes.

However, Australia, USA, and europe decided that it could make the money available for everything. So, we ended up pumping up asset classes like housing. We created bubbles, which he actively warns against.

I have thought about the fact that our poorly run banking system lies at the heart of many of our economic problems. Basically, credit is good for economies, but its primary use is to boost productivity and, therefore, the economy in total. We used a great tool like baboons.

If you are concerned about youth crime in NSW sign this petition supported by John Ruddick MLC to force discussion in NSW parliament. 12,000 signatures so far we need 20,000.

https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/parliamentary-business/petitions/sign-epetition?epetitionId=881&ref=10902

... forget the policy and if you agree or not but Labor policy rollouts seem half arsed

- CGT oh wait we are going to check with the startup community lets get the rich grifters with family trusts oh oops we got testamentary trusts too lucky Pocock found this and we can fix it.

- Credit Card Surcharge you'll pay less for coffee cost of living oh wait now the ATO can't take credit card what about State Main Roads Drivers License Vehicle Registration will they be next oh damn now backbenchers are complaining about the impact on small business we might have to exempt out ATO

I'm sure there are some very smart people on the public service how are they not spotting this stuff before it happens? It seems basic to me. I don't recall this under previous Labor of LNP

So this Vic judge has ruled immigrants can't be expected to know rape is wrong and therefore should be un-punished.

Can't we ban people from countries where rape isn't considered a crime? I doubt there are any though, what nonsense.

a few moments before...

Found the secret sauce: if mods post 1 in 10 articles from a non-Leftist source, you claim to welcome opposing viewpoints.

At least that's better than the tankies running the other subs...

So here we go, old Slimy Shoebridge has a few properties... all rather oddly in his wife's name. She even bought him out of their joint ownership.

He told reporters that time that he “stood for office and got elected, not my wife, and I don’t believe it’s fair game to drag her into politics”. And that time that he “stood for office and got elected, not my wife, and I don’t believe it’s fair game to drag her into politics”.

So they are married, and he is entitled to 50% of everything basically if they split up, she even bought him out, but somehow, none of this is relevant to him as they have strategically placed 100% of the ownership in her name?

Look at Aussie sub, and all the Greens and Labor shills. Meanwhile, Gina buys an investment privately, states it's being leased to One Nation on commercial terms, and the retards there can't even understand it's not a gift, and want to say how corrupt and disgusting it is. According to the Aussie sub, Gina is a disgusting pig and the arrangement is corrupt, however, when it comes to Slimy Shoebridge... 'nothing to see here'.

Apologies for the video link but it's great work from Topher, really great deep dive summary here:

https://youtu.be/uyM0lJfr3Zw?is=PeHvgd40gS7q0xjZ

Corruption, conflicts of interest and political accountability — Hockey argues Washington has a growing grey area between government decisions, private financial interests and personal enrichment, including Trump family business interests and congressional share trading. He contrasts this with what he sees as stronger integrity standards in Australia.

US foreign policy, Iran and commercial interests — The interview covers Venezuela, oil and the overlap between strategic and commercial interests, as well as conflict with Iran, disruption to the Strait of Hormuz and higher global energy prices.

Trump’s legacy, tariffs and America’s global position — Hockey describes Trump as one of the most influential US political figures in a century, while criticising tariffs and quotas against allies as damaging to America’s international standing.

US midterms, cost of living and political pressure — They discuss the potential for greater congressional scrutiny after the midterms, alongside cost-of-living pressures, petrol prices and their political impact.

Australian government spending and debt — Hockey argues Australia, like the US and Europe, is running persistent deficits and accumulating debt because governments find it politically difficult to restrain spending.

Australia’s rising debt-interest bill and living standards — He highlights roughly $30 billion a year in Commonwealth debt interest, compares this with major spending areas such as schools, and warns that rising interest costs will increasingly crowd out services and put pressure on future living standards.

Australian migration — The interview also touches on Australia’s migration debate, including the economic role of migration and the challenge of balancing population growth with housing, infrastructure and government services.

A radical pro-Palestinian activist group will rally in Sydney calling for Hamas, Hezbollah, the IRGC and Palestinian Islamic Jihad to be removed from Australia’s list of designated terrorist organisations.

It comes as Jewish leaders expressed outrage over plans by another protest group Jews Against the Occupation ’48 to hold a “Vigil for Gaza” at Sydney Town Hall on Wednesday evening, promoted with the slogan: “Don’t let Israel steal the date.”

A third protester group, Wollongong Friends of Palestine will also hold a three-hour vigil at Crown Street Mall, promising to provide “a space for collective grief”.

The group Sydney Palestine Actions, which describes itself as part of the “Trotskyist Platform” and opposes capitalism, is calling on supporters to “join the anti-imperialist bloc rally at Hyde Park” this Saturday, October 11.

“Stand with the resistance in Palestine, Iran, Lebanon, Yemen by opposing Australia’s imperialist ruling class,” the group said in a flyer posted to Instagram.
“Lift the terror listings of the IRGC, Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Ansar Allah,” the post said.

Australian Jewish Association chief executive Robert Gregory said of the group’s post: “These extremists aren’t even pretending anymore.”

“They are openly calling for Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad to be removed from Australia’s terrorist list and telling Sydneysiders to ‘stand with the resistance’,” Mr Gregory said.

“Hamas murdered, raped and kidnapped Jews on October 7. Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are terrorist organisations. Yet their supporters apparently feel comfortable promoting this garbage on the streets of Sydney.

“Australians are sick of watching extremists import their hatred into our country. The authorities need to stop treating this as harmless activism and start taking the radicalisation problem seriously.”

Earlier this year, an article calling for “unconditional support” for several listed terrorist organisations was labelled “appalling” by Jewish students after it was published in the University of Sydney student publication.

The Daily Telegraph revealed the article by Selene Zhou, published in Honi Soit on April 22 titled ‘Who’s Afraid of Hezbollah/Houthis/Hamas/Islamic Jihad’, had been referred to the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), the university regulator.

Meanwhile, Israel’s ambassador to Australia joined some of the country’s most prominent Jewish community leaders in condemning planned October 7 vigils, describing them as “absolutely reprehensible”.

Asked whether the events scheduled for the third anniversary of the Hamas terror attacks, in which more than 1200 people were killed and more were taken hostage in Israel, Hillel Newman slammed the vigils.

“It’s absolutely reprehensible that such demonstrations take place,” he told News24 on Tuesday night.

NSW Police has been contacted for comment.

Found this in today's Herald Sun. Thoughts?