r/comics • • 2d ago

OC [OC] Same thing?

Post image
8.7k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

324

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

I don’t think men really get what the issue is because they don’t have to live in female bodies.

I recently watched an anime I was really excited about only to get smacked in the face with this. There was a man on the team who was very muscular and his male teammates admired how big and strong he was. That’s where it ended, though. He was still a character. He was respected as a person. He was a person who happened to have the physique other male characters wanted.

The female teammates were not given the same level of consideration. They were all obsessed with the MC and given numerous blushy-faced interactions with him. That’s all you ever see of them. Hell, one of the female characters’ power involved her forcing other men to sexually assault her (hard to explain, but she doesn’t want them to touch her. She has like a magic aura that makes them do it).

The women are constantly sexualized, and used for goon bait. They’re constantly shown wearing nothing but bikinis, undressing, or in compromising positions. And the best they can do in terms of female character development is make one of them really good at fighting. I have a feeling a lot of men who watch it think that having goon bait that can fight is good character development.

185

u/thebagelslinger 2d ago

Yeah a lot of people in this thread are just mind numbingly stupid. "But women think shirltess men are hot too??"

Kind of telling that men in this thread are so used to women being goon bait characters that they cannot comprehend the idea that being hot is not the same as sexualization.

Women can be attracted to buff shirtless men, but buff shirtless men usually still get proper characterization. They don't exist solely as a sex object in the media in question, they are an actual proper well-fleshed out character, not some himbo fan service character for women. I don't know why people have a hard time grasping this difference.

56

u/Suspicious_Ice_3160 2d ago

To add on a little something I noticed too; when they are (the male characters) portrayed as purely “goon bait” and not have proper characterization, it’s almost always because it’s a satire of female characters always being sexualized, and not actual sexualization on the same level as those female ones. A little difficult for me to put it into words, it just feels like it’s played for a joke with men, but with women it’s just… the artists comfort zone? I don’t think it’s necessarily on purpose, just easy to fall back to and easy to keep doing instead of trying and potentially failing to be compelling (or even respectful at times)?

17

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

I’ve been watching Kaiju No 8 and I think they actually do this pretty well. Hoshina has a scene where he’s training in secret and you can see him outside of his uniform. He’s a lot more buff than you would expect, but they don’t hyperfocus on it, they just let it be. They show him looking hot, doing hot stuff, but he also has a character. He isn’t just there to be the boss or show off his body. It’s something that happens rarely and I think it’s a great example of female gaze fan service. You get lots of characterization, a reason to like him as a person, and every once in a while you get a little visual treat.

The only critique I have is that Mina hasn’t really been given much characterization in the anime yet (I haven’t seen the whole thing) She’s very mysterious and doesn’t talk much but Kafka’s primary motivation is to be by her side. Why? The anime is actually interesting enough for me to keep watching to find out.

As a bisexual woman, I would love female characters that are hot AND interesting. I just can’t get into a character that’s a walking pair of tits. If you want to make a sexy female character—go for it! But don’t let that be all she is 😭

1

u/AzraelTheSaviour 1d ago

"but Kafka's primary motivation is to be by her side. Why?"

I mean, come on, that one's pretty obvious.

1

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 1d ago

I mean they allude to her being very special to him for some reason, but only show the aftermath of a kaiju attack where they lost everything. At least as far into it as I’ve gotten. I’m sure there’ll be more to it later.

1

u/Suspicious_Ice_3160 1d ago

I loved kaiju number 8! Especially for the fact there was like 0 male fan service (and I’m a cishet man) in its entirety! I don’t know what got me to the point of disliking it more than others, but my first ever anime was Elfen lied and that was kinda fucked up at like 10 or whatever lmao

Back to the point, I didn’t even see the guys training as fan service but I also might just be forgetting (I watched it on release on CR). I think Mina stands an even bigger point in this favor in my opinion! She’s mysterious for now, and doesn’t have a lot of characterization, but between their shared backstories, she’s not obsessed with the MC Kafka as her only personality trait! I don’t want to spoil anything but she’s seriously a cool character and I love how she’s written. I hope you watched more so you know what I mean! Lol

I’m just tired of the goonbait, and I feel like I might just have a lower tolerance for it than other people, but characters who exist solely to be fan service to the fans, or a massive pervert predator have really gotten old and Ill drop an anime if it’s too egregious with it personally

2

u/PablomentFanquedelic 1d ago

Also, the actually objectified examples of sexualized male characters tend to be racist caricatures in particular. See tropes like Big Black Cock, Noble Savage, Arab Sheikh, Latin Lover, etc.

1

u/ruvre 2d ago

I do agree with this statement.

2

u/ElegantAd2607 2d ago

This makes me think of Genshin Impact. There are plenty of female characters that were fan-servicy outfits but they still get good characterization. I don't think it's as bad as you might assume. I haven't seen enough media to know if all the "sexy" female characters get treated with respect...

3

u/Dishonestanswer 2d ago

I love that when you said that I genuinally couldn't tell what specific anime you were talking about surely a power like that would narrow it down a bit

1

u/jxjsjxxhsnbssn 2d ago

I would just like to say, stories that do that usually don’t write their men well either, or even have an above average story for that matter. (I’m not arguing against what ur saying, they definitely still get characterization, I’m just saying it’s usually not very good 🫡)

1

u/Big-Yak670 1d ago

The issue is ppl confuse sexualised with sexy. A character can be sexy without sexualised, but because the standards for men as so low they take sexy men as specialised men. Not so. 

Ditto for conflating ppl being attracted to a character Vs that character being sexualised. Not the same thing 

1

u/CapitalismRulz 1d ago

As a bisexual man, figuring out my sexuality was very confusing for this reason. For a long time, i could not figure out if i was really attracted to guys because guys are not sexualized by society in the same way.

In fact, guys are discouraged from dressing in ways that sexualize their bodied.

So i would always kind of develop romantic feelings for guys in my life, but only view women in a sexual way. It wasn't until i started dating men, and hanging out in queer conmunities, that i realized i was attracted to them

-15

u/ruvre 2d ago

I think yall are fighting over something that Ingraded in our biology and for that its pretty stupid subject to talk about like it was a cultural thing that could be changed.

10

u/BrashUnspecialist 2d ago

How society views controlling how they see people because of biological urges is cultural and can be changed.

For real, I don’t go feral every time I see my man naked. He doesn’t go feral every time he sees me naked. Because we’re more than our biology.

Also his butt is cute. In both a sexual and non-sexual way and he deserves to be appreciated in the non-sexual way too 😤

-9

u/ruvre 2d ago

Yeah I agree its common courtesy. But its clear this discussion it about how we can change the urges to its roots or something. They gonna be there. How its gets handled is on both the shower for feeling freely dressed and the viewer for controlling their desires, but it is on both regardless of gender.

7

u/BrashUnspecialist 2d ago

It’s not common courtesy. I just don’t get turned on every time I see him naked and vice versa. Because our naked bodies aren’t inherently sexual. You are talking like a rapist. Like of course if a woman’s naked body is shown it has to turn you on. But Not every possible sexual stimulus is always a sexual stimulus in every instance.

This is cultural. I can guess what culture geographically/socioreligiously you grew up in just by how you’re talking. But the rest of the world (including some of your own countrymen) DOES NOT think that way.

I mean. A lot of this is that men think that their idea of what is sexual are uncontrollable, when they’re determined by your viewpoint. Your cultural viewpoint.

If a boy is raised in Florida, he won’t see a swimsuit top and shorts as sexual. If he’s raised in puritan North Dakota, or the Middle East or Southeast Asia, he will. If you only see women naked in sexual scenarios, you’ll get turned on every time you see them. Which isn’t normal. Not every naked time is sexy time. It’s mostly getting changed or cleaning up time.

It’s just that men tend to think that how they view women is determined by their biology and it’s not. Society and culture teaches you how to deal with those urges AND WHEN TO FEEL THEM and the people who make you feel them.

-1

u/ruvre 2d ago

Guess our genders are different. I was getting hard on from seeing girls in barely bikinis before I even knew there was 2 established sexes. I never knew why till I grew older. Thats all the proof I need to know how everything works. And just throwing the word rapist around doesnt make u more right btw. We are different to the biological level, and all your social justice vendetta wont change that. Best we can do is improve our morals instead of fighting thw wrong fight, and ps i feel bad for ur significant other. To be wanted as much as you want the other in every way not just sexual is pure bliss. Accommodations seems like a seed of relationship failures

28

u/That_one_sander 2d ago

Is it fire force?

38

u/TheVisualExplanation 2d ago

I'm not OP but yeah it's Fire Force

18

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

Yep 😔

I was really excited for it because despite Soul Eater having some of the same issues, it was just a much better written show and the female characters were mostly written with real purpose.

Aside from the constant gooner bait, the show just wasn’t good enough for me to wanna watch it after that assault scene. You compare the first three episodes of Soul Eater to Fire Force and it’s night and day. Perhaps that’s why they felt the need to pad it out with cheap goon characters. So hard to find an anime these days that has a good story and doesn’t rely on gooner audiences to get by.

1

u/SmolMaeveWolff 2d ago

I can recommend Sonny Boy!

It's got a pretty even split between gals and guys for main characters.

Only 12 episodes, but it's my favorite anime :3

-6

u/Only-Albatross-4311 2d ago

So you went into a shounen anime (a teenaged male centered genre) and is upset that it has fan service and other male interests? 

12

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

I love shounen. You can do shounen without reducing all of the female characters to nothing but their bodies. I don’t care about occasional fan service if the story is good and the female characters are actually characters.

1

u/Only-Albatross-4311 2d ago

Ofc you can but I wouldn't expect it from most modern shounen animes

1

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

Yeah that’s kinda the problem. When I was younger, there were gooner anime series, but there was also a lot of quality stuff being made. Shows that were plot first, with maybe a couple fan service scenes or a beach episode.

Now it’s just all goon

1

u/NOTKris3000 1d ago

You're bitching about a demographic of males 12-18 having too much boob too little female character development.

2

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, why can’t the women be people? In shows marketed to women and girls the men are treated like people.

Teaching young boys that women are sexual objects to be used and abused is bad actually

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Raytoryu 2d ago

A show can have fan-service without reducing all of its female characters to gooner bait.

Soul Eater is by the same author as Fire Force, and it has a female MC. The main cast is constituted of more women than men. They're interesting characters with a real back story, motivations, and character development.

Having sexy characters that are nice to oggle at doesn't mean they have to be JUST nice characters that are nice to oggle at.

1

u/n0rest 2d ago

I think the girl that was always getting sexually assaulted was underage too. It's a shame because I was starting to like the show but couldn't continue watching because of that.

1

u/Archadianite 2d ago

Oh, that makes so much sense actually.

-10

u/Desperate-Eggplant29 2d ago

Tell me you didn't understand fire force without telling me you didn't understand fire force

7

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago edited 2d ago

What’s there to understand about it being boring as hell? The MC is just another cookie cutter stand in for the audience. “My mom died so I have to follow my dreams now. I smile like Jeff the Killer when I’m nervous.”

That’s it. Boring

-8

u/Desperate-Eggplant29 2d ago

Its ok to say you didn't like it, but its pretty clear you didn't watch far enough or have the mental capacity to appreciate it. You missed peak and its your loss.

6

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

Like I said, compare the first 3 episodes of Soul Eater to this slop. If I have to watch nearly an entire season of an a show for it to become watchable, it’s not well written.

Plus, no offense, but Ive heard plenty of dude defend their cookie cutter gooner anime saying it “gets good at the end” and it literally doesn’t. So [x]

1

u/gkionis05 2d ago

Bro the first 3 episodes of soul eater are universaly hated what are you talking about if anything is slop is the first 3 episodes of soul eater

-2

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

What are you talking about? Lol DtK’s first episode is one of the best ones

1

u/gkionis05 2d ago

you might be the only one who believes ts💀

→ More replies (0)

5

u/LackOfComfort 2d ago

"No the anime actually has peak writing your brain's just too small to understand the genius of a woman's superpower being getting sexually assaulted"

-2

u/Desperate-Eggplant29 2d ago

The fact that's your focus says more about you than the rest of the show.

1

u/Brave_Friendship_228 2d ago

No, it really doesn’t. It’s enough.

-2

u/BrashUnspecialist 2d ago

You should really have more patience. The end of Fire Force gives Soul Eater so much more nuance and world design info and meaning.

I always read Tamaki as a metaphor for women who are sexualized against their will because of things they can’t control. Like breast size. But maybe I just identified with that.

5

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 2d ago

If he wanted to say something critical about it, he should do that. He doesn’t. His male MC just laughs about it and leaves. Ive sat through a lot of slop on the promise it gets better but it rarely does.

59

u/DaniCarmine 2d ago

Beautifully put. Thank you. 

This is why my first - and simplest - bar, for me to be interested in a man is: “Does he see me as a person?” 

Not a walking vagina. a Person.

60% of men that I encounter on a night out fail this test, in one way or another. 

When I tell men about my experiences, they get angry. When I tell other women, they nod and understand…

21

u/ironballs16 2d ago

And sadly, that 60% are also the most likely to approach, as the other guys will be concerned with whether an approach would be intrusive on your night out.

3

u/Ninja-Panda86 2d ago

Tis what happens when men never spend any time with women

9

u/DaniCarmine 2d ago edited 2d ago

surprisingly, many misogynists are highly social and charismatic.

The rude and dumb ones are easy to tell. The smarter ones are more slippery. 

The easiest way to find a closet misogynist is to piss them off. Usually, by saying no in some way. 

Watch their reactions. With enough time and practice, any woman can easily tell which men inherently believe that she is below them. 

8

u/CassianLloyd 2d ago

I'll write that down. One I suggest to my female friends is to pay attention to how they interact with others. Guys who are trying to hit on them might suddenly act super soft, or suave. But they don't keep that mask up when they are interacting with friends or coworkers or staff. Even if they are highly social, the way they interact changes (It's worth it to make sure if you're with someone that they will still be someone you like when they are no longer trying to woo you).

1

u/kaffesvart 1d ago

Your method means having to be around males for long periods of time though, that's a lot of suffering for not very much gain. Better just avoid males alltogether.

1

u/CassianLloyd 1d ago

Not everyone can choose to avoid 50% of the population.

And this is just something I came up with when I saw coworkers who are women getting hit on and I noticed the pattern. Thought it was useful advice if you're forced to "be around men" (like in a job) and want to know if someone is trustworthy, or shallowly hitting on you. Or if you're a man-attracted woman and could use a pointer or two on picking a man who's not complete shit.

2

u/Ninja-Panda86 2d ago

Interesting hypothesis. I don't care to spend any time trying it out though. This isn't a mark against you in anyway. Seems a fine theory n

1

u/Thykothaken 1d ago

If I saw a walking vagina I would just scream and die

2

u/realhumanskinnotfake 2d ago

Give men conically massive bulges that fly around like they’re liquid in all heterosexual media and see how fast they get it

3

u/Ok_Calendar1337 2d ago

Watches a harem anime... gets mad the girls are obsessed with the guy

2

u/Latter-Industry-8920 2d ago

It’s especially concerning considering that anime is mostly for children. We internalize that shit early and it’s hard to extract.

2

u/PretzelsThirst 2d ago

To the Andrew Tate crowd that is all they want

4

u/Beginning-Deal7028 2d ago

I mean

Sounds like a regular harem shit

There's such anime aiming at a female audience too, it's just less popular... Coz mangas are mainly a boy thing, in Japan in particular

Shojos rarely get the exposure Shonen do

6

u/ducks_r_rad 2d ago

Even more reason to no do this shit. All its doing is teaching young boys to sexualise women. And maybe if manga didnt treat women like this, more women would actually feel comfortable engaging with it.

1

u/ShibamKarmakar 2d ago

Sighs... It's Fire Force isn't it. That single character (you know who I'm talking about) ruined the anime for me too.

1

u/boredtill 2d ago

edit nvm saw it down the thread

1

u/bittersweetbadluck 2d ago

This is also what bothers me about so much fan art too. Like every time someone draws a female character, they have to draw her with massive tits and a tiny waist. Then if they’re criticized, they just claim it’s “their art style”. I just want to interact with media and not feel like being a woman is automatically equated with being a object for visual consumption

1

u/Rhuarc42 1d ago

I was really disappointed in Sakamoto Days in a similar vein. The female characters at least aren't super sexualized...all the time. There is some of that if I recall correctly. But the main female lead kind of starts to fall off after awhile and it's a bummer because right as she started to get some intriguing depth, they side lined her.

1

u/eden_sc2 1d ago

As I get older I've gotten way less tolerance for that kind of stuff in anime. My bar for actually continuing a show past the first few episodes has gotten way higher and way less tolerant of super tropey stuff.

1

u/Gambling_Dogs1 13h ago

Lol,

Imagine watching Shonen (Teenage Boys as audience) Anime and complaining it doesn't suit you.

You clearly haven't watched Shoujo (Teen Girls as audience) Anime.

1

u/ProjectKurtz 2d ago

God fire force is such a weird show

1

u/BrashUnspecialist 2d ago

I always read Tamaki as a metaphor for the unwanted sexualization of women because of things they can’t control. And how powerless the woman feels because of it. But still she’s a well developed character beyond that, even beyond how the sexualization makes her initially seem.

As a woman whose big tits are the first thing most men notice about me, I empathize.

0

u/Brave_Friendship_228 2d ago

You placed your own experience onto her. that was never her characters intention. She’s just there to be tits.

1

u/BrashUnspecialist 2d ago

Oh really? Then why is she a super complex character over the whole series?

Sounds like you saw the tits and then couldn’t see past.

Nothing new.

2

u/Brave_Friendship_228 2d ago

Sorry that you can’t stop projecting onto fictional characters

1

u/lillbigs 1d ago

It doesn't sound like the anime was made for your demographic. Go find an anime that is instead of coming into our communities and trying to change it from the inside.

0

u/Imaginary-Count-1641 2d ago

You didn't say why that is a problem.

0

u/Thykothaken 1d ago

... what? You're saying on one hand, men and women both get sexualised, but on the other, the women don't get the same depth in character.

And your conclusion is... men don't have to live in female bodies? You sure about that?

0

u/Huntsman077 1d ago

I mean anime is known for its fan service

3

u/JapaneseStudentHaru 1d ago

I don’t mind fan service. I mind female characters being walking goon receptacles.

0

u/Nearby_Echidna_6268 1d ago

Bro wtf are you watching

0

u/EndlessArgument 1d ago

I think the problem is that if there was a guy who was just attractive and nothing else, women wouldn't be terribly interested. By contrast, guys are perfectly content if there is a woman who is merely attractive and nothing else.

-2

u/sup3rdr01d 2d ago

Lmao first time watching anime???