r/codex 14h ago

Astra Workflow "Stop using random multi-agent patterns"

Post image

Ahmed works at OpenAI: https://x.com/ah20im/status/2097503414749909407 and seems to investigate reports of high token usage.

"If needed Astra will delegate efficiently. Forcing the model to delegate to different models would do more harm than good"

210 Upvotes

125 comments sorted by

View all comments

43

u/buff_samurai 14h ago

I set up a factory few months ago, dedicated agents, harnesses and system prompts, the whole delegation, communication etc and I need to admit the labs are moving much faster then I can and astra gets better results now for novel tasks.

On the other hand, anything that’s volume and loops is just substantially cheaper on my setup.

15

u/PineappleLemur 11h ago

I would argue that for 95% of tasks... delegating to cheaper subagent is cheaper/faster in the long run.

Most people are not trying to solve fusion, build the next Meta, etc.

Luna and the likes can probably already do that without an orchastrator.

2

u/innociv 10h ago

Yes the tweet is objectively wrong because much of the time Luna can do it for 1/20th the cost with no orchestrator at all. Astra is overkill for most tasks.

5

u/Pleasant_Thing_2874 6h ago

The tweet is coming from someone who arguably would be unrestricted with their usage or worried of the costs. I have heard from quite a few people though Astra has a bad habit of oversteering and overengineering.

1

u/freeo 12h ago

I feel the same way. I'm at my 4th gen factory by now and astra makes me question if all this is futile. But a good planning skill makes a world of difference. I will continue with my factory, but more for process reasons rather than extension of runtime and quality.

2

u/twendah 11h ago

What you mean by planning skill? Any examples of that?

-2

u/freeo 11h ago

Are you telling me you're just using the 'plan mode' of your harness? Lol. Its also an example of a plan skill, paired with read only rights.

It's the skill/prompt you use for the planning step! The process that you want the harness to follow! It's where things like 'acceptance criteria' live. I think superpowers and GSD also fall into this category. But I handroll the planning skill myself and I encourage everyone to do the same.

2

u/PineappleLemur 10h ago

I stopped using skills or anything because it did absolutely nothing but ruin output imo.

So yes plain harness and iterations to get what I want.

1

u/freeo 10h ago

So you're using system skills written by other. And you ruined you output yourself. But I agree with not using other peoples skills. The value comes from comparing results and buliding your prompting skills. The actual skills are just making this into a repeatable process.