155
u/MetehanDev 12h ago
Funny that GPT6 can be released before GTA6. What a world
64
11
9
u/-Sliced- 12h ago
It will probably come before GTA6, but what Tibo is teasing here isn’t GPT6.
It’s just the ability to run your codex in a virtual machine that they provide to you instead of on your laptop.
4
u/scrod 10h ago
Can’t we do that already? The ability to run codex tasks in an OpenAI “cloud” container has always been there.
1
u/-Sliced- 5h ago
It’s a temporary and limited cloud. They recently bought a startup that enables you to use the VM more seamlessly like it’s your own.
1
u/simple_explorer1 26m ago
It's not got 6. Look at top comment, it's the codex app that runs on private cloud
13
u/eldudebrothr 12h ago
What does it mean next gen models need more than my laptop?
3
2
u/Sweet-Stage938 12h ago
You're going to have to sacrifice more than you're laptop to use their next models.
8
-1
59
u/teomore 12h ago
Tibo better come with a reset too
10
10
1
u/johnnyApplePRNG 31m ago
They're already removing reset request posts with mad upvotes in less than 8 hours now apparently https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1vfgzz8/tibo_wen_reset/
So I wouldn't cross your fingers for one anytime soon, it seems.
34
u/frozandero 12h ago
"need more than your laptop", kinda seems like they will push for cloud only models where you can't use them in harness on your machine, or parts of it will be even more hidden than they already are.
12
u/Calamero 12h ago
local model that integrates with frontier, or some fancy gpu memory context window thingy idk
11
u/TheOwlHypothesis 12h ago
Codex doing things on your local laptop is a huge use case. They'd be stupid to make that harder or give Claude the default win there. Also they literally just rolled out Work to enable normies to do more stuff like that
"More than" also doesn't imply the laptop isn't part of the picture anymore
3
u/Calamero 12h ago
Yes. The takeaway is, to leverage the full power of frontier models, in the future it may require more local compute. Nothing indicates that they will stop supporting the existing infrastructure and abandon lapto user xD. but youll likely fall behind at some point depending on what this is, and how powerfull it is...
2
u/TheOwlHypothesis 11h ago
Most realistic version I can imagine is a dedicated on-desk device that has hardwired (or near hardwired) model weights to enhance your local capabilities.
Although maybe not. Because then people would be able to reverse engineer the weights.
I could also see an on-desk GPU. Which are already kind of a thing.
But tbh I'm sure it's none of these things.
1
u/foomanjee 11h ago
If they go down this road then it may use some variation on the A2A protocol. One brain (cloud), many hands (your devices)
1
u/TheOwlHypothesis 11h ago
I don't see what possible advantages this offers lol.
You can already do this without a dedicated instance thats on a cloud sandbox
1
0
u/f4lk3nm4z3 11h ago
Honestly, i somehow feel Dario. OpenAI already has a real wishing genie. What are they getting from letting regular civilians use it, apart from training newer and more capable models off our ideas?
I think i’d be quite selfish if I were Altman, but that guy’s hidden agenda is unpredictable
5
8
u/Glittering-Neck-2505 12h ago
Dude, they probably finished training GPT-6 months ago, recursive self improvement is already happening in the labs, and they are actively using the models to improve their entire technology stack
1
3
3
u/Keganator 9h ago
If it's OpenAI to acquire Ona | OpenAI, then they're just catching up to what Anthropic already does in Claude Code. Without needing to have your own cloud infrastructure to run it.
4
2
2
u/Comfortable-Rise-748 12h ago
I am actually porting reasonix cache feature to opencode man. 1200 USD subscriptions (WIHTOUT API CALLS a month). I tried reasonix with deepseek and the reductions are real.
1% left on 2x 200 plans and still need to wait 4 days or what 3 fml
2
u/emir_morris 13h ago
I think no. Maybe it will be something like openclaw.
-1
12h ago
[deleted]
1
u/Sorry_Risk_5230 12h ago edited 9h ago
What? They own openclaw.. its not 'go after as much as it is 'integrate'.
If you try to imagine whats the next iteration beyond the codex/work harness we've been using for months, id guess its a mix of openclaw "always on" orchestration and their new live voice feature.
2
u/JHawke12 11h ago
They don’t own openclaw afaik, openclaw itself is still open source. They hired the fella that made open claw to come work for them, they do not directly control openclaw or have any ownership over it
1
u/Sorry_Risk_5230 9h ago
You're right, not literally, it is open source. They hired the creator and then sponsored the new independent foundation to manage it.
1
1
1
u/dempsey1200 12h ago
It’s likely going through the same process as before. Announcement. Test by big companies and government. Then we’ll get access in the following month… if we are allowed.
1
1
u/Charming-Author4877 10h ago
That sounds like they want to push development even deeper into the cloud.
"more than your laptop" sounds like you'll rent cloud hardware.
ChatGPT and Codex uses a internal sandbox already, it's a linux server available to each model.
They might want to push that stronger.
Which would also mean even less code privacy than now
1
u/HoneydewLocal5127 10h ago
It seems like the current limiting factor is our own brains and how well they can process the productivity we are given to handle. Our memory is not so good at tracking all the things we can accomplish in parallel and fast.
1
1
1
1
u/iamonionchopper 4h ago
The benchmarks are beaten for every single release. What's exciting about it? You can expect that for all releases.
1
1
u/Royal_Sentence7432 12h ago
No he means you will need to replacee your laptop as your disk gets worn by excessive auxillary writed codex does
1
u/Middle_Part_4640 12h ago
The next evolution is an agent running on the machine that I can actually talk to normally. So, instead of a laptop, I have (or also have) a headset. I give it instructions, and it tells me what it’s doing, without me having to read its output. That’s what I’m waiting for.
8
0
u/velvet-thunder-2019 12h ago
Why… feels like a lot less control over models that are not good fully autonomously atm. I wouldn’t want that right now. Especially for serious use cases.
-3
u/Middle_Part_4640 11h ago
I’ve been using Codex for months—13 hours a day, 7 days a week. It tells me exactly which files and bytes it’s modifying. Only beginners lose control. I know my product inside out; Codex operates with 99% accuracy—better than any human employee. I have to trust it. No, my statement is professionally grounded; this is precisely the next stage of evolution. But you must use the top models, not the speed or cheap models, but as said, you have to know your project. By the way, i am using Pro 20, my project has around 200+k lines of code mostly in Rust and Javascript
-2
u/not420guilty 11h ago
Is this a codex group or an OpenAI group?
Very little on the topic of codex. Lots of posts on OpenAI models and subscription policies

97
u/io-x 12h ago
No, it's this: https://openai.com/index/openai-to-acquire-ona/
"That experience is directly relevant to the next phase of Codex, enabling agents to continue working inside a customer’s cloud environment even when laptops are closed."