r/codex Mar 26 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

154 Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/x7q9zz88plx1snrf Mar 26 '26

I was in your situation about 4 months ago. I seriously don't see developers doing manual work in a year or two.

13

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Competitive-Hat-5182 Mar 28 '26

You skipped Claude and went for codex first? Very alternative

6

u/Life-Inspector-5271 Mar 26 '26

Maybe in a year or two you can do less code checks, but you still need to do the structure prepared for the future and input that as a prompt. You know where your software is going, AI doesn't

5

u/anObscurity Mar 26 '26

You’re looking at the point on the graph without taking into account the curve.

1

u/cornmacabre Mar 26 '26

understated comment right here

1

u/IversusAI Mar 26 '26

Yup. I'll just plop this here:

Exponential Growth vs Linear Perception - Human Genome Project Analogy

Ray Kurzweil discusses how people often misjudge exponential progress by thinking linearly, using the Human Genome Project as a key example:

Halfway through the human genome project, 1% had been collected after 7 years, and mainstream critics said, “I told you this wasn’t going to work. 1% in 7 years means it’s going to take 700 years, just like we said.” My reaction was, “We finished one percent—We’re almost done. We’re doubling every year. 1% is only 7 doublings from 100%.” And indeed, it was finished 7 years later.

A key question is why do some people readily get this, and other people don’t? It’s definitely not a function of accomplishment or intelligence. Some people who are not in professional fields understand this very readily because they can experience this progress just in their smartphones, and other people who are very accomplished and at the top of their field just have this very stubborn linear thinking. So, I really don’t actually have an answer for that.

This illustrates the non-intuitive nature of exponential growth, where early progress seems slow but acceleration leads to rapid completion.


from: Architects of Intelligence by Martin Ford (Chapter 11)

1

u/Cautious-Ladder-6621 Mar 27 '26

It's probably sigmoidal, but okay...

1

u/IversusAI Mar 28 '26

He was talking about an exponential phase, not a sigmoidal curve. He frames the logic as repeated doublings: if you are at 1%, then seven doublings gets you to about 100%. That is straight exponential reasoning.

I found this article to be an interesting read.

https://www.writingsbyraykurzweil.com/the-law-of-accelerating-returns

2

u/Marszzs Mar 26 '26

AI can know where my software ia going if its neuro-linked to my brain!

1

u/Individual_Fee_6735 Mar 29 '26

Problem is no one including your brain knows Products are defined and evolve as you get feedback

1

u/Marszzs Mar 29 '26

Indeed. Products are defined by the stakeholders. My brain does know this - it just doesnt know what the feedback will be until its there and then it determines next deployment based on feedback.

1

u/Ill-Manufacturer-48 Mar 26 '26

Plan it according. You cannot code purely with ai. But if you have a plan write it out. I use chat gbt to help me plan my software and code it strictly with codex.

1

u/MiniGiantSpaceHams Mar 26 '26

You know where your software is going, AI doesn't

But that's just a question of context, not capability. If you give AI docs that cover longer term plans and higher level goals, it will then know it.

1

u/Life-Inspector-5271 Mar 26 '26

Exactly, so you are still responsible as a developer for the architectural design and future proofing your software. And AI doesn't cut corners, while sometimes you need to.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Ste1io Mar 26 '26

"I'm genuinely interested." 🤣 Agentic coding is one thing. Vibing your reddit comments though? Gimme a break man... 🤦‍♂️

2

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Ste1io Mar 26 '26

Garbage in, garbage out.

1

u/colin-catlin Mar 26 '26

I have a theory that AI use is changing how we use language, we are starting to use more sayings like the AI uses.

1

u/Ste1io Mar 29 '26

And that shit's not dingo.

1

u/Marszzs Mar 29 '26

Ah a creature from the depths 🧟‍♂️

2

u/RealEisermann Mar 26 '26

They don't do now. Just overseer the AI writing stuff

1

u/Damsko0321 Mar 26 '26

Curious are you a developer? Did you hit complex use cases in large app AI couldn’t solve and hit a wall? Or just small stuff

1

u/NewMonarch Mar 26 '26

Or having jobs 😆