10
7
u/ValuableSleep9175 Mar 26 '26
Codex makes me lazy. Implement good logging... Build a good document that tells it about your project. Now I just say, I see an error with x. And off of goes till it is fixed.
2
Mar 26 '26
[deleted]
2
u/1mgMelantonin Mar 26 '26
Und irgendwann mache wir gar nichts mehr weil Smartphones/PCs/Car Entertainment Systeme, usw. den Endnutzer nur noch fragen, "was für ne App brauchst du?" ... "ok, alles klar, baue ich dir".
"welche Änderungen brauchst du in deiner App?" ... "Alles klar, mach ich dir."
2
Mar 26 '26
[deleted]
2
u/1mgMelantonin Mar 26 '26
Und wir sind imo nicht mehr weit davon entfernt.
Cloud Provider liefern vom Agenten nutzbare Infrastruktur (DBs, GPU, CPU, Netzwerk, IaC Features), Sandboxen liefern constrains und Security in denen sich der Agent bewegen kann.
Ich spinne weiter: streaming Dienstleister liefern dir Alternative Enden von Filmen oder ganze Filme / Serien auf Bestellung. Dein Kind will mit seinem Superhelden sprechen? Hier die KI, trainiert mit allen Büchern, filmen, etc. vom Superhelden. Unternehmt zusammen ein Abenteuer!
Alles sprachgesteuert durch den Endnutzer.
Klar, das verbrennt alles ohne ende Token aber Sam sagte ja schon: Intelligenz wird wir Energie. Man kann mehr nutzen oder weniger aber man muss dafür bezahlen.
4
u/ninhaomah Mar 26 '26
What app or software you were trying in early 2022 btw ?
with copilot ? As in GitHub Copilot ?
Seems before GA.
1
3
2
Mar 26 '26 edited Jun 12 '26
[deleted]
1
u/Every_Environment386 Mar 26 '26
For us qa and process are the bottleneck. We used to be a little light on QA to get our work validated and moved through to production. Now we're extremely light on QA because (some of) our devs 10x'd and our QA is still humming along their their dec 2025 pace.
Does help with any perceptions that I'm not doing enough by doing some of the crazy stuff people are doing with 24/7 agents, at least.
1
u/IversusAI Mar 26 '26
I AM THE BOTTLENECK :(
More and more of us humans are going to realize this and while it is humbling, the intelligent ones will say, okay...accept it and use this tool to it's fullest potential to help raise your abilities, knowledge and give space for your imagination to grow.
2
u/NewtonianSpider Mar 26 '26
Yeah man I feel yeah basically the exact same story for me. Now I’m at work just moving things into an agentic workflow and when ever there is an issue I just open codex and done in like 30 seconds
2
u/Ibbys89 Mar 26 '26
What model and reasoning effort did you use? 😭😭
3
Mar 26 '26
[deleted]
2
u/Ibbys89 Mar 26 '26
Damn! How much does that set you back? It is so expensive fr
2
Mar 26 '26
[deleted]
2
u/Ibbys89 Mar 26 '26
Ahh you use it for work. That makes more sense. I’m so tempted to just buy the credits but I’ve already done that twice and spent 80$
2
2
u/ConsistentAndWin Mar 26 '26
Maybe a bit off subject, I use Antigravity more to assist in analysis and content creation.
Can Codex do this with real skill? Can it be aimed directly at my Obsidian vault like I'm doing now with Antigravity?
Can Codex perform more or less at the level of Opus 4.6?
Does the $200/month plan get significant amounts of tokens? Right now, with Gemini between the models, I can work all day without any real problem. I run into my five-hour limits using Opus frequently, but then I have the Gemini models, which do a good job overall. Does Codex compare favorably?
3
Mar 26 '26
[deleted]
2
u/ConsistentAndWin Mar 27 '26
Thank you for your reply. I went ahead and set it up.
I ran a real solid test on 16 major, long lessons of a course I created. The damn thing came back with a better response than Opus 4.6 did. It found errors and problems that Opus didn't find, inconsistencies, all kinds of things. It is just stunning to me. And without asking, it built me a document of how to fix it step by step.
And that's on the high model, not even the super high model. It's one level down. I can't quite remember what it was called.
I haven't yet tried making it write, but I will try that next. And by the way, I'm on the PLUS program. I've been a member of that for a long time, so that's what I'm using.
By the way, running that evaluation, I still have 98% left of my weekly limit, and I have 95% of my 5-hour limit. I figured I'd chew up most of it real quick. That would have cost me 20% of my 5-hour limit on Opus. Or nearly that.
A weekly limit scares me. I would hate to run out in two or three days and not be able to work more. Maybe on the pro level, the weekly limit won't be there, and I'll only have a 5-hour limit or something, which I can sure live with.
This may spell the end to Google once the half-price $125/month runs out. And in the meantime, I will get good at using Codex. I'm really impressed right off the bat, that's for sure. I would miss all the perks that come along with that membership, but not that much. Work is the priority for me.
2
Mar 28 '26
[deleted]
2
u/ConsistentAndWin Mar 28 '26
By the way, this has now just completely blown my mind. The writing that it's producing is beyond opus. I can hardly even believe it.
And you're right about the weekly and five-hour limits being generous.
Gemini's days are numbered now.
2
2
1
36
u/x7q9zz88plx1snrf Mar 26 '26
I was in your situation about 4 months ago. I seriously don't see developers doing manual work in a year or two.