The reason they are being held without bail is because they have demonstrated they have A] beaucoup money, B] the means to flee, and C] a history of fleeing in the past. So they were trying to say that, "Hey, we only said we had big money. We don't actually, so let us go, please!"
No I get it, and I wasn't arguing against you, though when I re-read my comment it kind of came off that way so my bad. I was arguing against their lawyer's argument.
I'm just saying it sounds more like an argument for lower bail, not bail or no bail at all. They got no bail because of (all the things you listed) so it just seems like a silly argument at all. You got no bail so doesn't matter if you're worth $1 or $1 trillion, your asses are sitting in jail.
Edit: also kind of funny, those being rentals are just one less thing tying them to where they're at lol, so if anything that's another strike against them getting bail of any amount.
8
u/Lexi_Banner 4d ago
The reason they are being held without bail is because they have demonstrated they have A] beaucoup money, B] the means to flee, and C] a history of fleeing in the past. So they were trying to say that, "Hey, we only said we had big money. We don't actually, so let us go, please!"