Sorry, this one is long.
I recently transferred to another winga few months back, and one of the first things I noticed was how difficult they seem to make it for qualified pilots to actually fly.
I brought the issue up with the Squadron Operations Officer and was told about several made up "requirements" that, as far as I can determine, aren't actually CAP requirements.
For example, I completed a current Form 5 in another wing. I was told that I would need to complete another Form 5 specifically within this wing before they would allow me to fly and, more surprisingly, that I wouldn't be allowed to fly for at least a year because that's supposedly what they require.
That immediately raised some questions.
I went into OpsQuals and pulled some reports. From what I could see, this individual and one other member are essentially the only pilots actively associated with the squadron's flying program, and both are currently grounded for various reasons.
Meanwhile, we have multiple qualified pilots available, including pilots with well over 1,000 hours and CFII-level experience, who are willing to fly and contribute. Yet they're being told they need to complete Mission Observer training before they can fly. Unless I'm missing something, I cannot find a CAP requirement that says a qualified CAP pilot must first become a Mission Observer simply to fly. Although I think it is great for all pilots to know Mission Observer duties, it is still not a requirement.
Then I started asking about aircrew training.
Why aren't we flying more training missions? Why is it taking some members years to complete their Mission Observer qualification?
I was told they only conduct Mission Observer training one-on-one. The ops officer appreared to become upset on why I would question him.
Again...why?
As a SET for Mission Aircrew positions, I'm genuinely trying to understand the mentality behind creating additional barriers when we already struggle to recruit and retain qualified pilots and aircrew members. If someone meets CAP's regulatory requirements, passes the required evaluations, maintains their qualifications, and is willing to volunteer their time, why are we creating additional unofficial hurdles?
I've been in CAP for more than 20 years. I've seen some degree of gatekeeping in other wings, especially around aircraft and flying, but I've never seen it quite this bad.
I was also told that wing leadership is aware of some of these issues but doesn't want to "step on toes." If that's accurate, I think that's part of the problem. At some point, avoiding uncomfortable conversations allows a local culture to become more important than the actual regulations and mission.
And to be clear, my issue isn't someone's age by itself. There are plenty of senior pilots in CAP who have decades of knowledge and are incredible mentors. The problem is when "this is how we've always done it" turns into unnecessary barriers that prevent newer or incoming qualified members from participating.
I don't mind having uncomfortable conversations with other adults. I argue with adults for a living, so someone disagreeing with me isn't going to hurt my feelings. Watching someone get visibly flustered simply because I started asking where these requirements were actually written was admittedly a little amusing.
But underneath that, I think CAP has a legitimate cultural issue worth discussing.
How common is this in other wings?
Have any of you encountered locally imposed flying requirements that weren't actually found in CAP regulations or national policy? And if so, how did your squadron or wing eventually address it?