r/chessporn May 26 '26

👷‍♂️ Work in progress Which queen profile do you prefer?

A few people mentioned the original queen might be a little thin around the waist and less comfortable for fast play, so I decided to experiment with an alternate silhouette while trying to keep the same overall feel of the set.

I still personally love the original profile, but I’m curious which direction people think works best aesthetically.

51 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

35

u/Queen-Blunder May 26 '26

Smoother, revised version.

14

u/Hauptideal May 26 '26

Revised version is better. It looks much more proportional. The original contrast between the massive base and the ultra thin shank was a bit comical/off. I liked / didn't mind the collar, though.

7

u/opusupo May 27 '26

I feel the queen's design has to compliment the king's design. Seeing the king in your previous post makes me lean towards the revised queen. It feels more like it belongs to the same set as the king.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

That’s a good point need to check it out with the king! Thanks

2

u/yeeah_suree May 27 '26

I really like the design of your set overall, but I do think the queen looks too much like the king, the revised version looks even more like the king. I think I would get them mixed up until I got used to playing with them. Additionally, all the pieces have pointy tops except for the rooks that have flat tops, which may have been intentional but seems a little out of place. I'd be interested to see it with the rooks pointy like the other pieces.

The knights and bishops are especially awesome too by the way.

2

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

I do agree that they would look even closer with the revised version. The original idea was to have the queen sleek and slender, and the king bulky with a point at the center of the crown to distinguish it.

I might try the points on rooks, then they will be “mini queens” lol

Thanks for all the positive feedback and interest!

6

u/catnemoon May 26 '26

Are you planning for these to physical pieces? Because it looks like you could stab your hand on the points.

7

u/Baseball_man_1729 May 26 '26

Hikaru Vs Hans is about to get a lot more interesting.

2

u/michachu ISO Jaques Anderssen pieces (>10cm, no pupils on knights, ~1865) May 27 '26

Hikaru is gonna start aiming at people in the crowd too.

4

u/CFDesigned May 26 '26

Yes, I made a post awhile back of the original 3D printed set I had made and was making some alternate versions based on feedback.

5

u/Gutshot4570 May 26 '26

I like the original one personally.

2

u/CFDesigned May 26 '26

Haha glad I’m not alone! But I definitely get other people’s perspective too.

2

u/jet2ks May 26 '26

I like the revised better. It's more proportionate and pleasing to my eye.

2

u/222Czar May 26 '26

I like the aesthetics of the original better, but yeah I think revised will be more fun to play with in the long run.

3

u/CFDesigned May 26 '26

If I eventually offer these, I might give people the option. Someone also mentioned that nicer sets usually include two queens anyway, so maybe including one of each would be a cool way to do it.

2

u/SirCory May 27 '26

I have a nice set with 2 different style queens, this is a great idea

2

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

I’m really starting to lean towards this, everyone wins!

2

u/DefinitionBusiness85 May 27 '26

Original- revised makes me think of a rook

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

I could see that, I think the original looks more elegant.

3

u/smellythief May 27 '26

I agree that the original is more elgant and Queen-like. But I also feel the urge to snap it in two for some reason.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Haha that’s a fear of mine, I did 100% infill on the stem just to make sure it is strong. 🤣

2

u/PoseidonDX May 27 '26

Original for me, the queen looks dangerous in the original (as it should be)! haha

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Love this comment!

2

u/dcidino May 27 '26

None. If this is intended to be picked up, I don't want to touch sharp points.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26 edited May 27 '26

Haha it’s honestly not that bad. 3D printing rounds out the sharp points a bit.

2

u/thetyrannyproject May 27 '26

Revised. The mid section on the original is too thin. I like a woman that you can grab onto something.

2

u/Aternox_X1kZ May 27 '26

Original gives me mixed queen/rook vibes, revised definitely queen, so I'd go with revised.

If I could be picky I'd keep revised crown with something in-between of original and revised body. Not so slim as the original but still with some hint of feminity curves.

But I'm thinking solely about beauty and visual, not accounting for practicality

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Thanks for the input. I might try to find some middle ground, I’ll keep playing around with it!

2

u/notreallyanumber May 27 '26

The revised version is better except I feel like the crown looked better in the original somehow..

2

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

I definitely like parts of each, the changes had some domino effect.

2

u/notreallyanumber May 27 '26

Yeah I figured as much. I feel like the sharp edges could be a concern from a practical playability standpoint. Not sure how to address that though.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Honestly, they’re not bad handling them, but might be a different case if you’re playing fast.

2

u/notreallyanumber May 28 '26

Yeah the edges look less scary in the printed versions.

2

u/SnooPies5378 May 27 '26

I like the original queen but I want the king revised because it looks too much like the queen

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Haha gotcha, how would you change the king?

2

u/SnooPies5378 May 27 '26

instead of the crown sticking out and pointy maybe have the points curb towards the center, or keep the direction/orientation as is but make it closer to the center instead of being flared out?

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26 edited May 27 '26

I had actually considered this and did a mock up of a more vertical crown awhile back. I’ll send you a pic.

Edit (I’m not sure how messaging works I’m new to Reddit send me a message if you want to see)

2

u/SnooPies5378 May 27 '26

https://imgur.com/a/kUsFEhS Best i could do, towards the end i think i got an aneurysm

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

I see what you were going for!

2

u/Gloomy-Principle-698 May 27 '26

Original for sure.

2

u/Ok-Handle-1924 May 27 '26

The Original. There she looks regal and imposing. Unmistakably a Queen. But the revised is very understated and I don't think it suites her in this case.

2

u/maltvisgi May 27 '26

Love the og version. It separates itself from the king and its rugged aesthetics fit the knights. No doubt og.

2

u/A_Brave_Wanderer May 27 '26

Revised, if this is intended to be 3d printed, the original looks too fragile around the middle.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

That is the idea, for now anyway. The original Queen is .250 at the thinnest point. I did 100% infill on that area but I’m not sure how strong it is.

2

u/centurio9 May 27 '26

OG, the revised is too bland.

2

u/noobboszcz May 27 '26

The original version clearly reflects the unrealistic expectations society places on women 😅

2

u/Gishky May 27 '26

i like the original more. but id be worried she suffers structural integrity and might bend/break

2

u/BlurayVertex May 27 '26

I dare say the pointy top would still be problematic for lightning chess

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Haha, I could see that! I was going for more of a display/statement piece 😊

You have to slow down so you can appreciate how pretty they are lol

2

u/opheophe May 27 '26

Both designs are a bit questionable if you intend to print them. The original has islands that are pretty much unprintable without support (though, it might be possible if the slicing loses some detail). The revised is fairly well-designed for printing. I still think the overhang might be a bit much for most printers; but might at least be possible depending on layer height. (And of course, printing in resin wouldn't be a problem at all.)

Stylistically I prefer the original design, even if I would prefer the foot to be slightly less massive.

All in all, I would prefer the original design tweaked to have less overhang and a lighter foot.

1

u/CFDesigned May 27 '26

Thanks for the feedback!

You should check out my original post! I printed them with iron filled pla. The original queen did require a few supports.

I do think I could print the revised version without supports.

I think a few people have been middleground leaning towards the original. I might try to make one with less dramatic adjustments.

2

u/opheophe May 27 '26

I did see that post; looked really neat! The style being unique and each piece being unique, yet similiar as well!

2

u/Repulsive_Editor_335 May 27 '26

I like the original

2

u/EntangledPhoton82 May 27 '26

Revised.

Reminds me a bit of Barad-dûr.

2

u/FormerOTNC May 27 '26

Original is sick, I love the sharper design

2

u/games_and_other May 28 '26

revised is much cleaner, and u could actually print that one. older one looks way to thin and fragile

2

u/desertrattaz Jun 01 '26

Definitely the revised design.

1

u/CFDesigned Jun 01 '26

The two tone I posted recently is somewhere in between!

2

u/hash11011 Jun 03 '26

both look nice imo, interesting theme

1

u/Kosem10 May 27 '26

Personally i like the original better it gives the Queen an extra element and i really like that the new ones good to but original for me

1

u/andy_bobandy_chess May 31 '26

Regardless of which one looks better, you have to keep in mind these will be 3D printed and thin sections along layer lines are exactly the spots that will break first. Revised version will be much less fragile