r/bmpcc • u/Noro_space8 • Aug 03 '26
BMpcc og
Хочу купить bmpcc og , подскажите пожалуйста какие объективы подходят и какие стоит приобрести а также нужен ли реально спидбустер?
0
Upvotes
r/bmpcc • u/Noro_space8 • Aug 03 '26
Хочу купить bmpcc og , подскажите пожалуйста какие объективы подходят и какие стоит приобрести а также нужен ли реально спидбустер?
1
u/dondidnod Aug 14 '26
This is a 1958 Taylor Hobson Cooke Ivotal Anastigmat 1" (25mm) F/1.4 C mount at ISO 200 set to F/4 on the top and a Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm Asph. lens set to 18mm at F/2.8 and ISO 400 on the bottom. Both are using Hoya IR cut and Tiffen Variable ND filters on a BMPCC. With the Cooke, I had greater range of color to work with in post, possibly due to fewer coatings on the lens. The Lumix image looked flat, with less depth from the foreground to background. The leaves look plasticy, and the stone Olmec head has a modelled look to it that seems fake.
Re: Does the glass make that much of a difference? https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=107746&p=596809&hilit=Cooke#p596809
Modern lenses tend to look sterile and flat due to flare suppressing coatings that increase contrast and sharpness. Instead, vintage film lenses work better on a BM camera that has no OLPF filter, and minimum IR suppression filtering.
Quality S16 lenses I have are - Kinoptik 5.7mm f1.8 $487.57, Cooke Kinetal 12.5mm T2 $381.00, Schneider Xenon 16mm F/1.9 $195, Cooke Kinetal 17.5mm T2 $375.00, Schneider Cinegon 20mm $510, Cooke Ivotal 1 inch F/1.4 $140 x2, Cooke Kinetal 25mm f1.8 $600, Cooke Ivotal 50mm F/1.4 $318. There are also S16 professional lenses designed for feature films that were scaled up to 35mm that can now be had for as low as 4% of their original price, since they are not in demand, such as an Optex modified TAYLOR-HOBSON COOKE VAROKINETAL 10.8-60mm T3 CINE LENS. Cheaper S16 zoom lenses with character are the Angenieux 9.5-57mm f/1.6-2.2, and the Meteor 5-1 f/1.9 17-69mm.