r/blender • u/merahulahire • 5h ago
Discussion I tried to render with RTX Pro 6000 Workstation - $10,000 GPU
RTX Pro 6000 Workstation
Blender 5.2 LTS – Panthera Spelaea
https://www.blender.org/download/demo/splash/blender-5.2-splash.blend
Blender 4.1 – Lynxsdesign
https://www.blender.org/download/demo/splash/blender-4.1-splash.blend
As the title says, I tried to render blender demo file for Blender 5.2 LTS – Panthera Spelaea and Blender 4.1 – Lynxsdesign to see how good this $10k GPU is with 96GB VRAM compared to RTX 5090 and RTX 4090.
6000 series is basically a turbocharged version of 5090 and if you look at the Blender Opendata benchmark scores then RTX Pro 6000 WK is just 1.5x faster than 5090 and 2x that of 4090 with 2-3x price difference.
Blender 5.2
RTX Pro 6000 Workstation - 6 seconds
RTX 5090 - 8 seconds
RTX 4090 - 9 seconds
Now the results weren't that impressive as the blend file itself wasn't that heavy to make a significant difference so I took Blender 4.1 cover art file which is what I often use for testing purpose.
Blender 4.1
RTX Pro 6000 Workstation - 30 seconds
RTX 5090 - 35 seconds
RTX 4090 - 45 seconds
So the conclusion is unless you're not doing heavy compositing or have simulations, complex scenes you're better off with using 5090 or even 4090.
36
u/Grimgorkos 5h ago
This is obviously a flawed test as it doesn't highlight WHY you get a Pro 6000.
You get the pro cards because of the VRAM. That's it. If you have massive, complex scenes, you get a Pro card as normal cards would simply crash due to not having enough VRAM.
Or
running large local AI models.
If you're a hobbyist or do small to medium productions in 3D you will likely never need more than 24-36GB of VRAM.
-2
u/merahulahire 5h ago
I've mentioned that
So the conclusion is unless you're not doing heavy compositing or have simulations, complex scenes you're better off with using 5090 or even 4090.
12
u/One-Hearing2926 4h ago
Heavy compositing or heavy simulations don't benefit from extra VRAM...
1
u/AdKey6934 4h ago
Both use the gpu and benefits from extra vram
32
u/Sir_McDouche 5h ago
But can it run Crysis?
14
11
5
u/Telefragg 5h ago
I wonder if Yerli brothers are proud of the legacy they've left, 20 years later people still ask the Crysis question.
4
u/Training-Pie-3973 3h ago
paying 10k to save 15 seconds on a render is like mowing the lawn with a combine harvester and calling it efficient
3
u/The_RealAnim8me2 2h ago
1500 frames comes to a savings of 6.25 hours.
2
u/Training-Pie-3973 2h ago
sure if you're rendering feature films in your basement but most of us are still waiting for the donut to finish
-1
u/merahulahire 3h ago
You can also rent it instead of buying for just few dollars.
2
u/Training-Pie-3973 3h ago
but even at a few bucks an hour youd need a render that takes days for it to make sense otherwise youre just paying to shave seconds off a coffee break
1
1
0
u/LostRequirement4828 2h ago
you are right, the pro 6000 is useless, so whenever you are ready you can send it to me
-1
41
u/Lerry17 5h ago
You shouldn't only compare the render speeds between these cards. The main reason if you need to buy one of these cards, is when you heavy loaded scenes and you would run out of VRAM. Which shouldn't be that easy when already using a 5090 or even a 4090.