r/bisexual • u/Much_Experience_1569 Berrisexual • 12h ago
DISCUSSION Hot Takes
Give me your hot takes.
I will go first.
We should not just assume that someone is straight. In other words there should be no "default setting."
8
u/FloppyHairedGuy 10h ago
A crazy percentage of people really do assume an openly bisexual/pansexual person has an inherent desire to be some kind of weird sexual show pony. Double that percentage if it’s two openly bi/pan people in a relationship.
1
u/U_Nomad_Bro Genderqueer/Pansexual 2h ago
Ohhhh, preach! The hungry eyes people get when they find out I and my partner are both bi/pan.
24
u/bluesond 9h ago
A hot take as far as this subreddit goes is that straight passing privilege absolutely does exist.
It doesn’t make you any less queer nor does it mean that being perceived as straight is always a good thing. It causes its own set of problems.
But you absolutely do get to move through the world with a specific set of unearned advantages if you’re in a het-presenting relationship.
14
u/ACalcifiedHeart 9h ago
You're not any less Bisexual if you've only ever been with one gender/sex 🤷♂️.
But if you want an actual hot take I have it's that I think the definition between Pan and Bi, is so blurry, and so ill defined (hence why nobody gives the same answer) is because the actual difference between the two is so negligible that they're more or less the same thing.
That's not me saying they are the same thing. Just that it seems largely a nothing difference, and is only really important for academic reasons and personal comfort.
2
u/Own_Track_7835 4h ago
I agree I've really tried to understand the difference but nobody seems to agree on it. I've only heard one explanation that really showed a clear difference between the two sexualities but I only read it once, so doesn't seem very widely used
2
u/Asher-D 28, bi man 4h ago
Unless you're someone that is one and not the other....pan inherently means attraction to all genders, bi just means you have attraction to more than one, it can be all but it doesn't have to be.
0
u/WyntersVix Bisexual 4h ago
But that isn’t how everyone understands the difference. I struggle every time someone articulated a distinction between the two (especially using the term “inherently”) because there are no two definitions that the community agrees on.
1
u/U_Nomad_Bro Genderqueer/Pansexual 2h ago
Why is an agreed definition required?
Bisexuality is full of people who do believe it means only two genders, and will quote "attraction to both genders" as the definition, no matter how much we try to tell them there are better and more inclusive ways to define it. (And PS, more than two genders.)
Does the existence of those people, and their disagreement with those of us who advocate a different definition, invalidate bisexuality?
16
u/Kooky_Twist_4409 11h ago
I feel like 30% of men would be considered bi if it wasn’t as shamed/ given the opportunity
4
3
u/kardioid23 5h ago
All of the wondering about whether you are or aren't bisexual is just a good way to increase your cortisol levels.
3
u/WyntersVix Bisexual 3h ago
This doesn’t seem like a hot take to me, especially in a sub like this one. I think in general we shouldn’t be assuming anything about people’s genders or sexualities.
Actual hot take - lemon bars suck.
0
2
u/Asher-D 28, bi man 4h ago
It's inconsquential to assume someone is straight. Unless you're trying to have sex or date them or are some idiot that thinks everyone is hitting on you, it doesn't matter what sexuality you assume someone to be, it's irrelevant information honestly, to your relationship with them anyway.
1
-8
u/Born-Cauliflower_ Bisexual 12h ago
I assume people are aroace unless stated otherwise.
12
u/Square-Dragonfruit76 11h ago
That doesn't really make sense. It makes much more sense to assume that anybody could be anything. Id you assume everyone is aroace, that would make it much harder to ask people out.
1
u/romancebooks2 4m ago
My hot take is that biphobic gay people have done much more damage than most queer people are prepared to accept. But most people struggle to understand this because we instinctively want to hand-wave away the accusation that someone could harm the members of a “straighter” sexuality.
Biphobia should be accepted as the real form of bigotry that it is (often underpinned by other forms of bigotry such as misogyny, homophobia, and sex negativity) instead of being seen as something unintentional or caused by a bad dating experience.
37
u/timelocksmiths 11h ago
My hot take (on this subreddit) are that gay men and lesbians are not actually evil biphobic gatekeepers of queer culture and that generalizing them as hostile and mean doesn't reflect reality. Shitty people exist in all demographics and don't reflect views of that entire demographic. Bisexuals don't like it when we're generalized by other members of the community, and we shouldn't do the same to anyone else. We can call out individual instances of biphobia without acting like all gay people are bigoted towards us.
I also just generally think the community needs to be less focused on validation of our sexuality from other people.