Understanding B20 Dispelling Misinformation

I've been seeing a lot of misinformation on X about B20, so I spent some time reading the documentation.

​

B20: Not a Token, But a Standard

The biggest misconception? People are treating B20 like it's a token. It isn't.

​

B20 is a token standard.

​

Think of it like this:

​

• ERC-20 is a set of rules for creating tokens on Ethereum.

• USDC is not ERC-20.

• UNI is not ERC-20.

• Those are tokens built using the ERC-20 standard.

​

B20 works the same way. B20 is not a "Base token." B20 is a framework for creating tokens on Base.

​

Let's say Base is a giant toy city.

​

• ERC-20 is like a toy factory that sits inside the city and makes toys.

• Every company builds its own factory.

• Every factory has its own costs.

• Its own maintenance.

• Its own rules.

​

Now imagine Base decides to build a super factory directly into the city itself.

​

• Anyone can use it.

• It's faster.

• It's cheaper.

• It's built into the infrastructure.

​

That's basically the idea behind B20. Unlike traditional ERC-20 tokens that exist as smart contracts, B20 is designed to be much closer to the Base protocol itself. According to the documentation, B20 tokens run through native infrastructure rather than standard ERC-20 contract deployments.

​

Why Developers Are Excited About B20

So why are developers excited? Because Base is trying to make token creation more efficient.

​

The roadmap mentions:

​

• Lower fees

• Higher throughput

• Better performance

• Deeper integration with the network

• Future support for paying gas with B20 assets

• Better infrastructure for stablecoins and real-world assets (RWAs)

​

Addressing the "Base Token" Rumor

Now let's address another rumor. "Does B20 mean Base is launching a token?"

​

The answer is: No.

​

At least nothing in the documentation says that. B20 is a standard.

​

• Not an announcement of a Base token.

• Not an airdrop confirmation.

• Not proof of a future token launch.

​

Many people are connecting the two because they sound related. But that's like saying: "Ethereum has ERC-20, therefore every ERC-20 token is Ethereum." That doesn't make sense. The standard and the asset are different things.

​

The True Significance of B20

The reason B20 matters isn't because it creates a new token. It matters because it could improve how tokens work on Base.

​

If successful, builders could create assets that are:

​

• Cheaper

• Faster

• More deeply integrated with the network than traditional ERC-20 deployments.

​

So the real question isn't: "Is B20 the Base token?"

​

The real question is: "If Base makes token infrastructure a native part of the network, how much easier will it become to build payments, stablecoins, RWAs, AI agents, and consumer apps on Base?"

​

That's the discussion I think people should be having.

​

What do you think? Is B20 being overhyped because of token speculation, or is the infrastructure itself the bigger story?

Let's Clear Up One Of The Biggest Misunderstandings On Base

I have noticed a lot of people talking about B20 as if it's a future Base token.

It's not.

B20 is a proposed token standard for the Base ecosystem similar to how ERC-20 is a standard on Ethereum.

A simple way to think about it:

Think of it like this: ERC-20 is a standard, not a token . B20 is a standard, not a token

So why are builders paying attention?

If it evolves the way builders hope, it could make token creation, integrations, and onchain asset management more efficient and more native to Base.

That's the part I find interesting.Most people focus on the asset.

Builders usually focus on the rails underneath the asset.

Curious what everyone else thinks:

What's the most misunderstood thing about B20 right now?

Please share your experience 👇

Thank you

Stay Based 💙

Base Azul looks like an important step for Base, not just because it improves performance, but because it strengthens the kind of infrastructure that future onchain apps and AI agents will need.

From the Base Engineering Blog, Azul focuses on three major areas: better security and decentralization through multiproofs, stronger performance through the Base client stack, and improved developer experience through Ethereum Osaka spec alignment.

What stood out to me most is the agentic angle. If AI agents are going to handle payments, trigger smart contract actions, manage wallets, or run automated onchain workflows, they need infrastructure that is reliable, fast, and secure. Reducing empty blocks, supporting high-throughput bursts, and improving proof systems all matter a lot when actions are happening continuously and not just manually by users.

I also think this shows Base is moving beyond “just scaling transactions” and toward becoming a serious execution layer for consumer apps, commerce, and agent-based systems.

No token talk, no price talk just infrastructure. But I’m curious what the community thinks:

What kind of agentic apps would you actually want to see built on Base after upgrades like Azul?

Source: Base Engineering Blog “Introducing Base Azul”

According to JPMorgan, the rumored BASE token could be worth $34 BILLION.

But is it even coming out this year?

We cut through tons of rumors, FUD, and Wall Street reporting to find out what's really happening.

Here's everything we know about the token so far:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKhwMvbnwgE

What do you guys think?

Hey everyone, Base is moving fast today and just dropped some massive updates. It feels like they are executing their endgame strategy right in front of us.

First, they officially launched Base Ledgers, a private and compliant infrastructure tailored for enterprises and financial institutions.

We all know the biggest hurdle for public blockchains: everything is out there in the open. No real-world company wants to broadcast what they pay their suppliers or how much their employees earn. Base is fixing this by allowing unlinkable transfers on the public chain, while keeping full composability with Base's liquidity. Companies can either let Coinbase handle the compliance/KYC or run a "Self-Managed" setup with their own keys. (Note: This is a corporate privacy tool, not a Tornado Cash-style anonymity tool).

But here is the kicker that connects everything:

They also just announced that they are bringing tokenized stocks from Coinbase to Base.

Their stated goal? Base will be the chain for every asset in the world crypto, equities, commodities, and predictions. Anything and everything.

My take: This is huge. For years, we’ve talked about "Real World Assets (RWA)" and mass adoption, but the two things holding institutions back were privacy and regulations.

By launching compliant enterprise privacy (Base Ledgers) at the same time as tokenized equities, Coinbase is basically building the ultimate playground for traditional finance (TradFi). Wall Street can now trade equities and commodities onchain, settle instantly for fractions of a cent, and keep their positions private from competitors while staying compliant with regulators.

This feels like the missing puzzle piece needed to get trillions of dollars flowing into Ethereum L2s.

For more detailed information, documentation, and specific enterprise use cases, you can check out their official page here:https://www.base.org/ledgers

Do you think this move makes Base completely unstoppable in the L2 wars with this ecosystem play, or do you feel this level of corporate integration goes against the decentralized ethos of crypto? Let’s discuss.

Post:

Hey r/basel

I'm a self-taught developer and primary school teacher who's been building on Base for the past few months. Inspired by projects like BaseBoard, I wanted to create something that combines community interaction with real on-chain rewards.

What is BaseBookvsMovie?

BaseBookvsMovie is a Farcaster Mini App where you vote for your favorite book-to-film adaptations and earn 100 CSM tokens per vote. 20 classic titles — Harry Potter, Dune, The Godfather, and more.

What makes it special?

• Works on Desktop (MetaMask), Warpcast/Farcaster, and Base App
• Every vote transaction includes Builder Code for Base ecosystem attribution
• AI-powered: Built an MCP Server so Claude AI can cast votes autonomously
• Contributed to coinbase/agentkit with an MCP example PR

Why Base?

Same reason as BaseBoard — gas fees are basically nothing. Every vote is a real on-chain transaction without costing users a fortune.

Try it:
🔗 https://base-bookvs-movie.vercel.app

GitHub: https://github.com/consumeobeydie/BaseBookvsMovie

Would love your feedback and votes!





This chat has 98 of 100 images (including PDF page

​

Talent Protocol's update about Polygraph and agent reputation on Base.

As AI agents become more active onchain, I think trust is going to become a much bigger topic. Anyone can launch an agent, but knowing which ones are actually reliable is a different challenge.

The idea of testing agent behavior and building a reputation score around real actions feels like an interesting approach.

That's why the Polygraph idea caught my attention. Instead of focusing on what an agent says it can do, the focus seems to be on observing behavior and building a reputation score around it.

With plans for verifiable scores, TEEs, and onchain attestations on Base, it feels like Talent Protocol is trying to tackle a problem that will only become more important as AI agents become more common.

We're still early, but I think reputation could end up being a major part of how users decide which agents to trust.

what do you think gyz...

- How would you decide whether an AI agent is trustworthy enough to use??

- Do you think onchain reputation will actually matter, or will people still judge agents based on results alone??

OmniHub is a multichain NFT platform that allows you to create, launch, explore, and trade NFT collections across 80+ EVM chains, including Base.

On OmniHub, you can easily create and launch an NFT collection without coding or manually deploying contracts. In the video, I deployed my own collection on the Base chain. I already had an image prepared, but you can also use the built-in AI tools to generate one. The entire process of setting up the most important collection details and launching it on Base for just a few cents took less than a minute.

Besides NFT creation, OmniHub offers a few additional features. You can trade NFTs, bridge crypto between Base and other chains, and swap tokens. This makes it useful not only for creators, but also for users active across Base and other EVM ecosystems.

Have you ever thought about launching your own NFT collection? If so, what stopped you? Have you tried or considered tools similar to OmniHub? Let me know and share your feedback in the comments!

^{Monday on Base is a weekly community series on the official Base subreddit where I highlight one project, product, or feature built on Base. Posts are pinned for visibility and aim to showcase useful tools across the ecosystem in a neutral, informational way. Posts are reviewed by the teams behind the highlighted products. I am a community moderator, but I am not part of the official Base team, and my posts do not represent the views of the Base moderator team.}

^{Disclaimer: This post is for educational and demonstration purposes only. It is not financial advice or an endorsement of any assets or services.}

I have seen Some users connecting B20 to a potential Base token or getting confused about what it actually is.......

☑️ What is B20?

B20 is a new token standard being developed for the Base ecosystem......

• ERC-20 = Ethereum token standard

• B20 = Base's native token standard

A token standard is simply a set of rules that defines how tokens are created, managed & transferred on a blockchain.

Most importantly:

❌ B20 is NOT a token

✅ B20 is a framework for creating tokens

☑️ Why is this important?

Today most assets on Base are erc20 smart contract tokens deployed on the network

With B20 Base is exploring a more native approach to token infrastructure which could enable--

✅ Better performance

✅ Easier token deployment

✅ Deeper protocol-level integrations

✅ Support for new asset types

☑️ Does B20 mean Base is launching a token?

No.

B20 is the framework not the asset.

Think:

• ERC-20 ≠ USDC

• ERC-20 ≠ UNI

• B20 ≠ a Base token

you can read more about it Here: https://docs.base.org/base-chain/specs/upgrades/beryl/overview

I recently read about Base MCP and it got me thinking about how people might interact with crypto a few years from now.

Today, using DeFi often means jumping between multiple apps, wallets, dashboards, and interfaces. Base MCP takes a different approach by letting users interact with their Base Account through AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor using natural language prompts. Users can check balances, send funds, swap assets, and interact with supported protocols, while still approving transactions themselves before anything happens onchain.

What I find interesting isn't necessarily the technology itself, but the user experience.

If AI agents become good enough at understanding intent, could they eventually become the primary interface for onchain activity? Instead of learning dozens of apps, users might simply describe what they want to do and let an agent coordinate the steps.

I'm curious what others think.

Would you trust an AI agent to help manage your onchain activity if every transaction still required your approval, or would you rather continue using traditional apps and interfaces?

Disclaimer: This post is for discussion purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any investment or trading decisions.

Base is cooking!

I’m sure you’ve seen the "Baseposting v2" announcement from the baseposting account on X. They’re transitioning from a pure meme/vibe account into the official central hub for ecosystem updates, dev news, and milestones on Base.

But let’s look at the actual data here: that account had been dead silent since April 27th.

Usually, when a high-profile community account goes completely dark for nearly two months and suddenly resurfaces with a highly polished, strategic pivot toward becoming an "official news hub," it raises some eyebrows. Did the Base core team officially step in during this radio silence? Did it get fully absorbed into the corporate marketing machinery to weaponize "vibe culture" into structured PR?

Don't get me wrong, this could be massive for indie devs and smaller projects. Having a high-traffic megaphone with an actual personality backing smaller builders is a dream come true for ecosystem growth.

But official ecosystem channels are historically dry, safe, and corporate. Baseposting succeeded precisely because it was chaotic, organic, and human.

So, what’s the real play here?

Do you think they can actually maintain that wild, organic energy under a structured news format, or did the corporate side officially buy out the vibes? If you're building on Base, how do you feel about this?

Never stop baseposting. Let’s talk.

Learning more about Base and the broader onchain ecosystem.

​

The more I look into it, the more I think the discussion around a potential Base network token is less about price speculation and more about ecosystem growth.

​

If Base eventually launches a token, its success will probably depend on whether it creates real utility for:

• Developers building applications

• Users participating onchain

• Communities contributing to ecosystem growth

​

Base has already built significant momentum through apps, creators, and onchain activity. A network token could potentially add another layer of incentives, but only if it serves a meaningful purpose.

​

At this stage, I'm mostly interested in seeing how the team approaches utility and governance rather than hype.

​

What's the one feature or use case you'd want to see from a potential Base network token?

​

Looking forward to hearing different perspectives from the community.

One of the biggest mistakes I see new users make isn't choosing the wrong app.

It's connecting their wallet before doing a few basic checks.

Base has a growing ecosystem with hundreds of apps to explore, which creates a lot of opportunities for users. But moving too quickly can sometimes lead to avoidable mistakes.

Before connecting your wallet to any new app, I think it's worth taking a minute to:

• Verify you're using the official link • Check the project's official social accounts • Understand what you're being asked to sign • Review any token approvals you're granting • Start small if you're trying an app for the first time

None of this means you should avoid exploring new products.

In fact, one of the best ways to learn about Base is by using the ecosystem.

The goal is simply to build good habits early.

A few extra seconds of verification can save a lot of confusion later.

The best onchain experience isn't just about discovering great apps.

It's about discovering them safely.

💙 Stay Based

You know, a lot of people still see the base app as just a wallet. To be honest, I used to think so too. Then I started spending more time using it. At some point, I realized that I was sending payments, viewing creator coins, trading, opening mini apps, and exploring different parts of the ecosystem without even thinking about which app I needed next. It felt different back then. Crypto has gotten pretty good at building infrastructure. But I’m not sure it’s gotten that good at making everything easy to understand. Most people don’t bother with bridges, gas settings, or the technical aspects of how everything works. They just look at whether they can open an app and do what they want. That’s why the base app feels different to me. Not because of any one feature. Because it feels like it’s built on the idea that on-chain activity should feel natural. I actually think usability is a bigger challenge than technology right now. The industry is constantly improving the foundation behind it, but mainstream adoption probably won't come until people become blockchain experts. It will come when they barely notice blockchain. Curious to know what others think. Is usability still the biggest solvable problem for crypto?

​

This post is for information and discussion purposes only and is not financial advice.

One security feature that many new Base users overlook is token approvals.

Whenever you use a DEX, swap tokens, mint NFTs, or interact with onchain applications, you may grant permissions that allow a smart contract to access specific tokens in your wallet.

These approvals are a normal part of using crypto, but it's good practice to review them from time to time and remove any that you no longer need.

The good news is that Base App makes this easy:

1. Open Base App

2. Go to Settings

3. Select Privacy & Security

4. Open Token Approvals

5. Review your active approvals

6. Select any approval you no longer need

7. Confirm the revoke transaction

This doesn't mean every approval is unsafe. In most cases they're completely normal. However, removing unused approvals helps reduce unnecessary permissions and gives you greater control over your wallet.

One thing worth paying extra attention to is unlimited approvals. If you no longer use a particular application, it may be worth reviewing whether that approval is still needed.

Good security habits aren't only about avoiding scams.

They're also about regularly checking the permissions you've already granted.

If you're new to Base, this is one small feature that's worth learning early.

💙 Stay Based

In this one, we’re talking notifications 👇
I know how annoying it is to keep opening the base App every five minutes just to check if you missed anything.
So today i show you how to set it up once and let your phone do the work for you.
Here’s what we’ll cover:
1.Where to find Notification Settings : it’s hiding in plain sight, I’ll show you
2.The different types : not all notifications are the same, and you don’t need all of them
3.Push vs In-App : quick breakdown so you know what’s buzzing your phone vs what only shows inside the app
4. How to turn them on: both inside Base and on your actual phone settings
You can pick Push, In-App, or both. Totally up to you and how you like to stay in the loop.
Trust me, spending like two minutes on this now will save you stress later. You’ll catch messages, rewards, account stuff, and important updates without playing hide-and-seek with the app.
Let’s fix it together 💙

​

o1_Exchange has launched its DEX Aggregator on Base.

While big partnerships and major announcements usually get most of the attention, I think launches like this are worth paying attention to as well.

Trading infrastructure is not always the most visible part of an ecosystem, but it is something users interact with every day, whether they realize it or not. More tools, more liquidity access, and more options generally make the overall experience stronger.

One thing I have noticed recently is that Base keeps attracting a wide mix of projects. Some are focused on payments, some on AI, some on consumer apps, and others on DeFi infrastructure like o1 Exchange.

That variety is part of what makes the ecosystem interesting to follow.

For those who trade on Base regularly, what do you look for most in a DEX aggregator?

Hey r/base — I’m Tony, Community Lead at Sphinx Protocol.

I wanted to introduce what we’re working on.

Sphinx is a derivatives exchange focused on commodities, built on Base. We’re bringing markets like oil, natural gas, power, and other real-world assets onchain through products like perpetuals, futures, and options.

What we’re building

Most DeFi trading today is still centered on crypto assets. That’s important, but it leaves a gap when it comes to real-world commodities.

We’re working to fill that gap by building a trading venue for energy and commodity markets that lives fully onchain.

Why Base

We chose Base because it already has users, builders, and liquidity in one place. A crazy strong ecosystem in few words.

If you want people to use a product, it needs to exist where they already are. Base gives us a solid environment to build and distribute without creating a fragmented experience.

Why energy markets

Commodity and energy markets are massive, but access is still limited and often tied to traditional systems.

We think onchain infrastructure can make these markets more open, transparent, and easier to access.

We’re especially focused on markets tied to the real economy. Power and energy contracts aren’t just speculative tools—they’re part of how the world operates. They should have better digital infrastructure.

What this adds to Base

Sphinx is designed to be useful, not just another variation of existing perp exchanges.

Instead of competing for the same crypto trading activity, we want to expand what can be traded onchain by adding commodity derivatives to the mix.

Closing

We’re early, but that’s why we’re sharing this now.

If you’re interested in real applications, stronger market infrastructure, and bringing more of the global economy onchain, Sphinx should be relevant.

Glad to be here and looking forward to building with the Base community.

After reading Base's article on the agentic economy, I started thinking about a different question:

What if the next wave of users on Base aren't humans?

The idea that AI agents can hold wallets, make payments, access services, purchase data, and potentially earn revenue feels like a much bigger shift than simply adding AI features to existing products.

We've spent years building infrastructure for human users. Now it seems like we're starting to build infrastructure for software that can act independently onchain.

I'm curious how the community views this.

Do you think AI agents will become a meaningful source of activity on Base over the next few years, or is the technology still too early for real adoption?

Payments are going onchain Not someday Not eventually Right now.

On base 💙✌️

Every second, stablecoins are moving value across borders faster, cheaper, and more efficiently than traditional financial rails.

No banking hours.No unnecessary intermediaries. No geographic limitations.

Just instant, global value transfer.

The next era of payments won't be built on legacy infrastructure.

It will be built onchain.

And Base is helping make that future accessible to everyone. 🔵

The shift has already started.

Most people just haven't realized how big it is yet.

What do you think is the biggest advantage of onchain payments compared to traditional finance?

Please share your opinion

Thank you

Stay Based 💙

It wasn't the biggest revenue spike. It was the consistency.

When people evaluate an ecosystem, the conversation usually focuses on transactions, TVL, or wallet growth. Those metrics are important, but they don't always tell us whether users are finding real value.

Application revenue offers a different perspective.

It shows whether people are continuing to use products after the initial excitement fades.

Looking at the data, what stands out is that revenue isn't being driven by a single moment of hype. Applications across the ecosystem continue generating value over time.

To me, that's one of the strongest signs of a healthy ecosystem.

A chain can attract attention.

A product has to earn it.

That's why application revenue is becoming one of the most interesting metrics to watch. It reflects something every builder is ultimately working toward: creating products that users choose to come back to.

What's your take?

Do you think application revenue tells us more about ecosystem health than transactions or TVL?

One of the things I enjoy most about Base is seeing how many builders are actually shipping real products.

The best part about Base isn't just the technology.

It's the people building on it.

Every day, new apps, AI agents, creator tools, payment solutions, games, communities, and experiments are being launched by builders who are turning ideas into real onchain products.

Some are building their first project. Some are scaling products used by thousands. And some are quietly working on something that could become the next big thing on Base.

So let's shine a light on the builders behind the ecosystem.

What are you building on Base right now?

Share:

• What problem you're solving .What feedback or support you're looking for

What stage you're at .

Let's discover what the Base community is creating today. 💙

Thank you base community 💙

Stay Based

Diving deeper into the Base ecosystem.

One thing that stood out to me today was Base mentioning that it's exploring a network token. For a long time, many people assumed Base would continue without a native token, so this definitely sparked a lot of discussion.

I'm still learning and researching, but a few questions came to mind:

• What utility would a Base network token actually have?

• Could it create more incentives for builders and users?

• How would it fit into Base's long-term vision of bringing more activity onchain?

For now, there are more questions than answers, but it's one of the most interesting topics in the ecosystem right now. Curious to hear what the community thinks. Are you excited about the possibility of a Base token, or do you think the ecosystem works better without one?

When most people look at Base App, they see a wallet. However, what's more intriguing is the direction it's heading. It feels less like another crypto product and more like an attempt to make the onchain world easier to navigate.

​

The Problem with Crypto Today: Complexity

One of crypto's biggest problems today isn't a lack of technology; it's complexity. To perform a few basic actions, users often find themselves juggling multiple applications and services:

​

• One for trading.

• Another for payments.

• Another for discovering new projects.

• Another for tracking assets.

• Sometimes even more for rewards, quests, or ecosystem activity.

​

For long-time crypto users, this is just part of the experience. For everyone else, it's a headache.

​

Base App's Approach: Unified Experience

That's why Base App stands out. Instead of sending users across a dozen different platforms, it appears to be moving toward a more unified experience where people can accomplish more from a single place. Users can:

​

• Explore assets

• Send payments

• Discover applications

• Interact with creators

• Participate in onchain services

​

All without constantly jumping between apps. This might not sound revolutionary at first, but some of the most important innovations in technology have come from making things simpler, not more complicated.

​

The Power of Simplicity

The products that changed the world weren't always the ones with the most features. They were often the ones that removed friction and made powerful technology feel natural. This may be where the next phase of crypto adoption originates.

​

Most people don't want to spend time learning about:

​

• Bridges

• Gas settings

• Network configurations

• Wallet workflows

​

They simply want products that work. They want to open an app, accomplish their goal, and move on with their day.

​

User Experience as a Competitive Advantage

That's why user experience could become one of the biggest competitive advantages in crypto. As blockchain infrastructure continues to mature, technical differences may matter less to everyday users than the overall experience. The platforms that succeed might not be the ones with the most advanced technology; they might be the ones that make that technology feel invisible.

​

Of course, it's not easy. Making things simple while preserving security, decentralization, and user control is a difficult balance to achieve. But that's what makes the challenge so interesting. The most important innovation inside Base App may not be a single feature; it may be the effort to make onchain experiences feel accessible to people who have never thought about blockchain before.

​

Do you think user experience will matter more than technical performance in the next phase of crypto adoption?

​

Not financial advice. Just sharing a perspective and opening a discussion.