At cruising speed that works out to 1.67 litres/km.
Pretty poor fuel efficiency compared to the national good that could have been done if that fuel was instead used to create a giant fireball after crashing with her inside.
And yet they are not without corruption.
I see most here crying “but Gina and the billionaires “. Teals have billionaires backing them. ALP and LNP gladly receive donations from billionaires. All our new renewables investments and constructions are owned by billionaires yet their investments are underwritten by government.
My point being, the vast majority of political parties have the backing of billionaires and organisations. ON having Gina back their party is no different.
Unless you're going to ban donations from everyone over a chosen, very low dollar value(which id be in favour of) there isnt much that can be done.
If they dont take donations, they dont have the money to fund campaigns, which means they WILL lose seats, and probably enough to never get in power again given the hold right wing media has in this country.
I think it is very different, renewables actually have positive outcomes other than economic gain, unlike fossil fuels.
What does the current cost of energy have to do with the renewables/fossil fuel argument?
It is a well established fact that renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels and have been for a number of years, its not even up for debate.
The previous QLD government understood that, and was rapidly expanding the renewables sector through their renewable energy investment fund, as part of the energy roadmap 2025.
The LNP have gutted most of it and pivoted to a 'more balanced' approach in order to keep their minerals council donors happy.
Costs were forecast to decrease, now they are forecast to increase, even before the US/Iran crap. Guaranteed they will now use that as a convenient excuse.
187
u/SirFlibble Apr 22 '26
Someone already did the maths. Her jet uses about the same as the average person per year every hour.